Denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 Arctic winter

The 2015/2016 Arctic winter was one of the coldest stratospheric winters in recent years. A stable vortex formed by early December and the early winter was exceptionally cold. Cold pool temperatures dropped below the nitric acid trihydrate (NAT) existence temperature of about 195 K, thus allowing po...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Khosrawi, Farahnaz, Kirner, Oliver, Sinnhuber, Björn-Martin, Johansson, Sören, Höpfner, Michael, Santee, Michelle L., Froidevaux, Lucien, Ungermann, Jörn, Ruhnke, Roland, Woiwode, Wolfgang, Oelhaf, Hermann, Braesicke, Peter
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12893-2017
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/12893/2017/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp59297
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp59297 2023-05-15T14:42:45+02:00 Denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 Arctic winter Khosrawi, Farahnaz Kirner, Oliver Sinnhuber, Björn-Martin Johansson, Sören Höpfner, Michael Santee, Michelle L. Froidevaux, Lucien Ungermann, Jörn Ruhnke, Roland Woiwode, Wolfgang Oelhaf, Hermann Braesicke, Peter 2018-10-08 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12893-2017 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/12893/2017/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-17-12893-2017 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/12893/2017/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12893-2017 2019-12-24T09:50:55Z The 2015/2016 Arctic winter was one of the coldest stratospheric winters in recent years. A stable vortex formed by early December and the early winter was exceptionally cold. Cold pool temperatures dropped below the nitric acid trihydrate (NAT) existence temperature of about 195 K, thus allowing polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) to form. The low temperatures in the polar stratosphere persisted until early March, allowing chlorine activation and catalytic ozone destruction. Satellite observations indicate that sedimentation of PSC particles led to denitrification as well as dehydration of stratospheric layers. Model simulations of the 2015/2016 Arctic winter nudged toward European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) analysis data were performed with the atmospheric chemistry–climate model ECHAM5/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) for the Polar Stratosphere in a Changing Climate (POLSTRACC) campaign. POLSTRACC is a High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO) mission aimed at the investigation of the structure, composition and evolution of the Arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS). The chemical and physical processes involved in Arctic stratospheric ozone depletion, transport and mixing processes in the UTLS at high latitudes, PSCs and cirrus clouds are investigated. In this study, an overview of the chemistry and dynamics of the 2015/2016 Arctic winter as simulated with EMAC is given. Further, chemical–dynamical processes such as denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 Arctic winter are investigated. Comparisons to satellite observations by the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (Aura/MLS) as well as to airborne measurements with the Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the Atmosphere (GLORIA) performed aboard HALO during the POLSTRACC campaign show that the EMAC simulations nudged toward ECMWF analysis generally agree well with observations. We derive a maximum polar stratospheric O 3 loss of ∼ 2 ppmv or 117 DU in terms of column ozone in mid-March. The stratosphere was denitrified by about 4–8 ppbv HNO 3 and dehydrated by about 0.6–1 ppmv H 2 O from the middle to the end of February. While ozone loss was quite strong, but not as strong as in 2010/2011, denitrification and dehydration were so far the strongest observed in the Arctic stratosphere in at least the past 10 years. Text Arctic Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 17 21 12893 12910
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description The 2015/2016 Arctic winter was one of the coldest stratospheric winters in recent years. A stable vortex formed by early December and the early winter was exceptionally cold. Cold pool temperatures dropped below the nitric acid trihydrate (NAT) existence temperature of about 195 K, thus allowing polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) to form. The low temperatures in the polar stratosphere persisted until early March, allowing chlorine activation and catalytic ozone destruction. Satellite observations indicate that sedimentation of PSC particles led to denitrification as well as dehydration of stratospheric layers. Model simulations of the 2015/2016 Arctic winter nudged toward European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) analysis data were performed with the atmospheric chemistry–climate model ECHAM5/MESSy Atmospheric Chemistry (EMAC) for the Polar Stratosphere in a Changing Climate (POLSTRACC) campaign. POLSTRACC is a High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO) mission aimed at the investigation of the structure, composition and evolution of the Arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere (UTLS). The chemical and physical processes involved in Arctic stratospheric ozone depletion, transport and mixing processes in the UTLS at high latitudes, PSCs and cirrus clouds are investigated. In this study, an overview of the chemistry and dynamics of the 2015/2016 Arctic winter as simulated with EMAC is given. Further, chemical–dynamical processes such as denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 Arctic winter are investigated. Comparisons to satellite observations by the Aura Microwave Limb Sounder (Aura/MLS) as well as to airborne measurements with the Gimballed Limb Observer for Radiance Imaging of the Atmosphere (GLORIA) performed aboard HALO during the POLSTRACC campaign show that the EMAC simulations nudged toward ECMWF analysis generally agree well with observations. We derive a maximum polar stratospheric O 3 loss of ∼ 2 ppmv or 117 DU in terms of column ozone in mid-March. The stratosphere was denitrified by about 4–8 ppbv HNO 3 and dehydrated by about 0.6–1 ppmv H 2 O from the middle to the end of February. While ozone loss was quite strong, but not as strong as in 2010/2011, denitrification and dehydration were so far the strongest observed in the Arctic stratosphere in at least the past 10 years.
format Text
author Khosrawi, Farahnaz
Kirner, Oliver
Sinnhuber, Björn-Martin
Johansson, Sören
Höpfner, Michael
Santee, Michelle L.
Froidevaux, Lucien
Ungermann, Jörn
Ruhnke, Roland
Woiwode, Wolfgang
Oelhaf, Hermann
Braesicke, Peter
spellingShingle Khosrawi, Farahnaz
Kirner, Oliver
Sinnhuber, Björn-Martin
Johansson, Sören
Höpfner, Michael
Santee, Michelle L.
Froidevaux, Lucien
Ungermann, Jörn
Ruhnke, Roland
Woiwode, Wolfgang
Oelhaf, Hermann
Braesicke, Peter
Denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 Arctic winter
author_facet Khosrawi, Farahnaz
Kirner, Oliver
Sinnhuber, Björn-Martin
Johansson, Sören
Höpfner, Michael
Santee, Michelle L.
Froidevaux, Lucien
Ungermann, Jörn
Ruhnke, Roland
Woiwode, Wolfgang
Oelhaf, Hermann
Braesicke, Peter
author_sort Khosrawi, Farahnaz
title Denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 Arctic winter
title_short Denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 Arctic winter
title_full Denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 Arctic winter
title_fullStr Denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 Arctic winter
title_full_unstemmed Denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 Arctic winter
title_sort denitrification, dehydration and ozone loss during the 2015/2016 arctic winter
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12893-2017
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/12893/2017/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source eISSN: 1680-7324
op_relation doi:10.5194/acp-17-12893-2017
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/17/12893/2017/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12893-2017
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 17
container_issue 21
container_start_page 12893
op_container_end_page 12910
_version_ 1766314480119054336