A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic

We examine the response of Arctic gas and aerosol concentrations to perturbations in pollutant emissions from Europe, East and South Asia, and North America using results from a coordinated model intercomparison. These sensitivities to regional emissions (mixing ratio change per unit emission) vary...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Shindell, D. T., Chin, M., Dentener, F., Doherty, R. M., Faluvegi, G., Fiore, A. M., Hess, P., Koch, D. M., MacKenzie, I. A., Sanderson, M. G., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M., Stevenson, D. S., Teich, H., Textor, C., Wild, O., Bergmann, D. J., Bey, I., Bian, H., Cuvelier, C., Duncan, B. N., Folberth, G., Horowitz, L. W., Jonson, J., Kaminski, J. W., Marmer, E., Park, R., Pringle, K. J., Schroeder, S., Szopa, S., Takemura, T., Zeng, G., Keating, T. J., Zuber, A.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/5353/2008/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp5195
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp5195 2023-05-15T14:41:20+02:00 A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic Shindell, D. T. Chin, M. Dentener, F. Doherty, R. M. Faluvegi, G. Fiore, A. M. Hess, P. Koch, D. M. MacKenzie, I. A. Sanderson, M. G. Schultz, M. G. Schulz, M. Stevenson, D. S. Teich, H. Textor, C. Wild, O. Bergmann, D. J. Bey, I. Bian, H. Cuvelier, C. Duncan, B. N. Folberth, G. Horowitz, L. W. Jonson, J. Kaminski, J. W. Marmer, E. Park, R. Pringle, K. J. Schroeder, S. Szopa, S. Takemura, T. Zeng, G. Keating, T. J. Zuber, A. 2018-01-15 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/5353/2008/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/5353/2008/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008 2019-12-24T09:58:11Z We examine the response of Arctic gas and aerosol concentrations to perturbations in pollutant emissions from Europe, East and South Asia, and North America using results from a coordinated model intercomparison. These sensitivities to regional emissions (mixing ratio change per unit emission) vary widely across models and species. Intermodel differences are systematic, however, so that the relative importance of different regions is robust. North America contributes the most to Arctic ozone pollution. For aerosols and CO, European emissions dominate at the Arctic surface but East Asian emissions become progressively more important with altitude, and are dominant in the upper troposphere. Sensitivities show strong seasonality: surface sensitivities typically maximize during boreal winter for European and during spring for East Asian and North American emissions. Mid-tropospheric sensitivities, however, nearly always maximize during spring or summer for all regions. Deposition of black carbon (BC) onto Greenland is most sensitive to North American emissions. North America and Europe each contribute ~40% of total BC deposition to Greenland, with ~20% from East Asia. Elsewhere in the Arctic, both sensitivity and total BC deposition are dominated by European emissions. Model diversity for aerosols is especially large, resulting primarily from differences in aerosol physical and chemical processing (including removal). Comparison of modeled aerosol concentrations with observations indicates problems in the models, and perhaps, interpretation of the measurements. For gas phase pollutants such as CO and O 3 , which are relatively well-simulated, the processes contributing most to uncertainties depend on the source region and altitude examined. Uncertainties in the Arctic surface CO response to emissions perturbations are dominated by emissions for East Asian sources, while uncertainties in transport, emissions, and oxidation are comparable for European and North American sources. At higher levels, model-to-model variations in transport and oxidation are most important. Differences in photochemistry appear to play the largest role in the intermodel variations in Arctic ozone sensitivity, though transport also contributes substantially in the mid-troposphere. Text Arctic black carbon Greenland Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Greenland Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 8 17 5353 5372
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description We examine the response of Arctic gas and aerosol concentrations to perturbations in pollutant emissions from Europe, East and South Asia, and North America using results from a coordinated model intercomparison. These sensitivities to regional emissions (mixing ratio change per unit emission) vary widely across models and species. Intermodel differences are systematic, however, so that the relative importance of different regions is robust. North America contributes the most to Arctic ozone pollution. For aerosols and CO, European emissions dominate at the Arctic surface but East Asian emissions become progressively more important with altitude, and are dominant in the upper troposphere. Sensitivities show strong seasonality: surface sensitivities typically maximize during boreal winter for European and during spring for East Asian and North American emissions. Mid-tropospheric sensitivities, however, nearly always maximize during spring or summer for all regions. Deposition of black carbon (BC) onto Greenland is most sensitive to North American emissions. North America and Europe each contribute ~40% of total BC deposition to Greenland, with ~20% from East Asia. Elsewhere in the Arctic, both sensitivity and total BC deposition are dominated by European emissions. Model diversity for aerosols is especially large, resulting primarily from differences in aerosol physical and chemical processing (including removal). Comparison of modeled aerosol concentrations with observations indicates problems in the models, and perhaps, interpretation of the measurements. For gas phase pollutants such as CO and O 3 , which are relatively well-simulated, the processes contributing most to uncertainties depend on the source region and altitude examined. Uncertainties in the Arctic surface CO response to emissions perturbations are dominated by emissions for East Asian sources, while uncertainties in transport, emissions, and oxidation are comparable for European and North American sources. At higher levels, model-to-model variations in transport and oxidation are most important. Differences in photochemistry appear to play the largest role in the intermodel variations in Arctic ozone sensitivity, though transport also contributes substantially in the mid-troposphere.
format Text
author Shindell, D. T.
Chin, M.
Dentener, F.
Doherty, R. M.
Faluvegi, G.
Fiore, A. M.
Hess, P.
Koch, D. M.
MacKenzie, I. A.
Sanderson, M. G.
Schultz, M. G.
Schulz, M.
Stevenson, D. S.
Teich, H.
Textor, C.
Wild, O.
Bergmann, D. J.
Bey, I.
Bian, H.
Cuvelier, C.
Duncan, B. N.
Folberth, G.
Horowitz, L. W.
Jonson, J.
Kaminski, J. W.
Marmer, E.
Park, R.
Pringle, K. J.
Schroeder, S.
Szopa, S.
Takemura, T.
Zeng, G.
Keating, T. J.
Zuber, A.
spellingShingle Shindell, D. T.
Chin, M.
Dentener, F.
Doherty, R. M.
Faluvegi, G.
Fiore, A. M.
Hess, P.
Koch, D. M.
MacKenzie, I. A.
Sanderson, M. G.
Schultz, M. G.
Schulz, M.
Stevenson, D. S.
Teich, H.
Textor, C.
Wild, O.
Bergmann, D. J.
Bey, I.
Bian, H.
Cuvelier, C.
Duncan, B. N.
Folberth, G.
Horowitz, L. W.
Jonson, J.
Kaminski, J. W.
Marmer, E.
Park, R.
Pringle, K. J.
Schroeder, S.
Szopa, S.
Takemura, T.
Zeng, G.
Keating, T. J.
Zuber, A.
A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic
author_facet Shindell, D. T.
Chin, M.
Dentener, F.
Doherty, R. M.
Faluvegi, G.
Fiore, A. M.
Hess, P.
Koch, D. M.
MacKenzie, I. A.
Sanderson, M. G.
Schultz, M. G.
Schulz, M.
Stevenson, D. S.
Teich, H.
Textor, C.
Wild, O.
Bergmann, D. J.
Bey, I.
Bian, H.
Cuvelier, C.
Duncan, B. N.
Folberth, G.
Horowitz, L. W.
Jonson, J.
Kaminski, J. W.
Marmer, E.
Park, R.
Pringle, K. J.
Schroeder, S.
Szopa, S.
Takemura, T.
Zeng, G.
Keating, T. J.
Zuber, A.
author_sort Shindell, D. T.
title A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic
title_short A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic
title_full A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic
title_fullStr A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic
title_full_unstemmed A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic
title_sort multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the arctic
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/5353/2008/
geographic Arctic
Greenland
geographic_facet Arctic
Greenland
genre Arctic
black carbon
Greenland
genre_facet Arctic
black carbon
Greenland
op_source eISSN: 1680-7324
op_relation doi:10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/5353/2008/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5353-2008
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 8
container_issue 17
container_start_page 5353
op_container_end_page 5372
_version_ 1766313131495129088