An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models - Part 2: Detailed comparison with two selected campaigns

This is the second part of a rigorous model evaluation study involving five global Chemistry-Transport and two Chemistry-Climate Models operated by different groups in Europe. Simulated trace gas fields were interpolated to the exact times and positions of the observations to account for the actual...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Brunner, D., Staehelin, J., Rogers, H. L., Köhler, M. O., Pyle, J. A., Hauglustaine, D. A., Jourdain, L., Berntsen, T. K., Gauss, M., Isaksen, I. S. A., Meijer, E., Velthoven, P., Pitari, G., Mancini, E., Grewe, V., Sausen, R.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-107-2005
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/107/2005/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp3997
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp3997 2023-05-15T17:35:30+02:00 An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models - Part 2: Detailed comparison with two selected campaigns Brunner, D. Staehelin, J. Rogers, H. L. Köhler, M. O. Pyle, J. A. Hauglustaine, D. A. Jourdain, L. Berntsen, T. K. Gauss, M. Isaksen, I. S. A. Meijer, E. Velthoven, P. Pitari, G. Mancini, E. Grewe, V. Sausen, R. 2018-06-28 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-107-2005 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/107/2005/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-5-107-2005 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/107/2005/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-107-2005 2019-12-24T09:59:13Z This is the second part of a rigorous model evaluation study involving five global Chemistry-Transport and two Chemistry-Climate Models operated by different groups in Europe. Simulated trace gas fields were interpolated to the exact times and positions of the observations to account for the actual weather conditions and hence for the specific histories of the sampled air masses. In this part of the study we focus on a detailed comparison with two selected campaigns, PEM-Tropics A and SONEX, contrasting the clean environment of the tropical Pacific with the more polluted North Atlantic region. The study highlights the different strengths and weaknesses of the models in accurately simulating key processes in the UT/LS region including stratosphere-troposphere-exchange, rapid convective transport, lightning emissions, radical chemistry and ozone production. Model simulated Radon, which was used as an idealized tracer for continental influence, was occasionally much better correlated with measured CO than simulated CO pointing towards deficiencies in the used biomass burning emission fields. The abundance and variability of HO x radicals is in general well represented in the models as inferred directly from the comparison with measured OH and HO 2 and indirectly from the comparison with hydrogen peroxide concentrations. Components of the NO y family such as PAN, HNO 3 and NO were found to compare less favorably. Interestingly, models showing good agreement with observations in the case of PEM-Tropics A often failed in the case of SONEX and vice versa. A better description of NO x and NO y emissions, chemistry and sinks is thought to be key to future model improvements with respect to the representation of chemistry in the UT/LS region. Text North Atlantic Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Pacific Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 5 1 107 129
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description This is the second part of a rigorous model evaluation study involving five global Chemistry-Transport and two Chemistry-Climate Models operated by different groups in Europe. Simulated trace gas fields were interpolated to the exact times and positions of the observations to account for the actual weather conditions and hence for the specific histories of the sampled air masses. In this part of the study we focus on a detailed comparison with two selected campaigns, PEM-Tropics A and SONEX, contrasting the clean environment of the tropical Pacific with the more polluted North Atlantic region. The study highlights the different strengths and weaknesses of the models in accurately simulating key processes in the UT/LS region including stratosphere-troposphere-exchange, rapid convective transport, lightning emissions, radical chemistry and ozone production. Model simulated Radon, which was used as an idealized tracer for continental influence, was occasionally much better correlated with measured CO than simulated CO pointing towards deficiencies in the used biomass burning emission fields. The abundance and variability of HO x radicals is in general well represented in the models as inferred directly from the comparison with measured OH and HO 2 and indirectly from the comparison with hydrogen peroxide concentrations. Components of the NO y family such as PAN, HNO 3 and NO were found to compare less favorably. Interestingly, models showing good agreement with observations in the case of PEM-Tropics A often failed in the case of SONEX and vice versa. A better description of NO x and NO y emissions, chemistry and sinks is thought to be key to future model improvements with respect to the representation of chemistry in the UT/LS region.
format Text
author Brunner, D.
Staehelin, J.
Rogers, H. L.
Köhler, M. O.
Pyle, J. A.
Hauglustaine, D. A.
Jourdain, L.
Berntsen, T. K.
Gauss, M.
Isaksen, I. S. A.
Meijer, E.
Velthoven, P.
Pitari, G.
Mancini, E.
Grewe, V.
Sausen, R.
spellingShingle Brunner, D.
Staehelin, J.
Rogers, H. L.
Köhler, M. O.
Pyle, J. A.
Hauglustaine, D. A.
Jourdain, L.
Berntsen, T. K.
Gauss, M.
Isaksen, I. S. A.
Meijer, E.
Velthoven, P.
Pitari, G.
Mancini, E.
Grewe, V.
Sausen, R.
An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models - Part 2: Detailed comparison with two selected campaigns
author_facet Brunner, D.
Staehelin, J.
Rogers, H. L.
Köhler, M. O.
Pyle, J. A.
Hauglustaine, D. A.
Jourdain, L.
Berntsen, T. K.
Gauss, M.
Isaksen, I. S. A.
Meijer, E.
Velthoven, P.
Pitari, G.
Mancini, E.
Grewe, V.
Sausen, R.
author_sort Brunner, D.
title An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models - Part 2: Detailed comparison with two selected campaigns
title_short An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models - Part 2: Detailed comparison with two selected campaigns
title_full An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models - Part 2: Detailed comparison with two selected campaigns
title_fullStr An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models - Part 2: Detailed comparison with two selected campaigns
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models - Part 2: Detailed comparison with two selected campaigns
title_sort evaluation of the performance of chemistry transport models - part 2: detailed comparison with two selected campaigns
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-107-2005
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/107/2005/
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source eISSN: 1680-7324
op_relation doi:10.5194/acp-5-107-2005
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/107/2005/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-107-2005
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 5
container_issue 1
container_start_page 107
op_container_end_page 129
_version_ 1766134688402898944