Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
This paper summarises the validation of GOME total ozone retrieved using the Weighting Function Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (WFDOAS) algorithm Version 1.0. This algorithm has been described in detail in a companion paper by Coldewey-Egbers et al. (2005). Compared to the operational...
Published in: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/ |
_version_ | 1821688034474590208 |
---|---|
author | Weber, M. Lamsal, L. N. Coldewey-Egbers, M. Bramstedt, K. Burrows, J. P. |
author_facet | Weber, M. Lamsal, L. N. Coldewey-Egbers, M. Bramstedt, K. Burrows, J. P. |
author_sort | Weber, M. |
collection | Copernicus Publications: E-Journals |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1341 |
container_title | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
container_volume | 5 |
description | This paper summarises the validation of GOME total ozone retrieved using the Weighting Function Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (WFDOAS) algorithm Version 1.0. This algorithm has been described in detail in a companion paper by Coldewey-Egbers et al. (2005). Compared to the operational GDP (GOME Data Processor) V3, several improvements to the total ozone retrieval have been introduced that account for the varying ozone dependent contribution to rotational Raman scattering, includes a new cloud scheme, and uses the GOME measured effective albedo in the retrieval. In this paper the WFDOAS results have been compared with selected ground-based measurements from the WOUDC (World Ozone and UV Radiation Data Centre) that collects total ozone measurements from a global network of stations covering all seasons. From the global validation excellent agreement between WFDOAS and ground data was observed. The agreement lies within ±1%, and very little seasonal variations in the differences are found. In the polar regions and at high solar zenith angles, however, a positive bias varying between 5 and 8% is found near the polar night period. As a function of solar zenith angle as well as of the retrieved total ozone, the WFDOAS differences to ground polar data, however, show a much weaker dependence as compared to the operational GOME Data Processor Version3 of GOME that represents a significant improvement. Very few stations carry out simultaneous measurements by Brewer and Dobson spectrometers over an extended period (three years or more). Simultaneous Brewer and Dobson measurements from Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic (50.2N, 15.8E) and Hohenpeissenberg, Germany (47.8N, 11.0E) covering the period 1996-1999 have been compared with our GOME results. Agreement with Brewers are generally better than with the simultaneous Dobson measurements and this may be explained by the neglect of stratospheric (ozone) temperature correction in the standard ozone retrieval from the ground. |
format | Text |
genre | polar night |
genre_facet | polar night |
id | ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp3984 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftcopernicus |
op_container_end_page | 1355 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005 |
op_relation | doi:10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/ |
op_source | eISSN: 1680-7324 |
publishDate | 2018 |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp3984 2025-01-17T00:23:04+00:00 Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data Weber, M. Lamsal, L. N. Coldewey-Egbers, M. Bramstedt, K. Burrows, J. P. 2018-06-28 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005 2019-12-24T09:59:08Z This paper summarises the validation of GOME total ozone retrieved using the Weighting Function Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (WFDOAS) algorithm Version 1.0. This algorithm has been described in detail in a companion paper by Coldewey-Egbers et al. (2005). Compared to the operational GDP (GOME Data Processor) V3, several improvements to the total ozone retrieval have been introduced that account for the varying ozone dependent contribution to rotational Raman scattering, includes a new cloud scheme, and uses the GOME measured effective albedo in the retrieval. In this paper the WFDOAS results have been compared with selected ground-based measurements from the WOUDC (World Ozone and UV Radiation Data Centre) that collects total ozone measurements from a global network of stations covering all seasons. From the global validation excellent agreement between WFDOAS and ground data was observed. The agreement lies within ±1%, and very little seasonal variations in the differences are found. In the polar regions and at high solar zenith angles, however, a positive bias varying between 5 and 8% is found near the polar night period. As a function of solar zenith angle as well as of the retrieved total ozone, the WFDOAS differences to ground polar data, however, show a much weaker dependence as compared to the operational GOME Data Processor Version3 of GOME that represents a significant improvement. Very few stations carry out simultaneous measurements by Brewer and Dobson spectrometers over an extended period (three years or more). Simultaneous Brewer and Dobson measurements from Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic (50.2N, 15.8E) and Hohenpeissenberg, Germany (47.8N, 11.0E) covering the period 1996-1999 have been compared with our GOME results. Agreement with Brewers are generally better than with the simultaneous Dobson measurements and this may be explained by the neglect of stratospheric (ozone) temperature correction in the standard ozone retrieval from the ground. Text polar night Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 5 5 1341 1355 |
spellingShingle | Weber, M. Lamsal, L. N. Coldewey-Egbers, M. Bramstedt, K. Burrows, J. P. Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data |
title | Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data |
title_full | Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data |
title_fullStr | Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data |
title_full_unstemmed | Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data |
title_short | Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data |
title_sort | pole-to-pole validation of gome wfdoas total ozone with groundbased data |
url | https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/ |