Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data

This paper summarises the validation of GOME total ozone retrieved using the Weighting Function Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (WFDOAS) algorithm Version 1.0. This algorithm has been described in detail in a companion paper by Coldewey-Egbers et al. (2005). Compared to the operational...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Weber, M., Lamsal, L. N., Coldewey-Egbers, M., Bramstedt, K., Burrows, J. P.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/
_version_ 1821688034474590208
author Weber, M.
Lamsal, L. N.
Coldewey-Egbers, M.
Bramstedt, K.
Burrows, J. P.
author_facet Weber, M.
Lamsal, L. N.
Coldewey-Egbers, M.
Bramstedt, K.
Burrows, J. P.
author_sort Weber, M.
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1341
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 5
description This paper summarises the validation of GOME total ozone retrieved using the Weighting Function Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (WFDOAS) algorithm Version 1.0. This algorithm has been described in detail in a companion paper by Coldewey-Egbers et al. (2005). Compared to the operational GDP (GOME Data Processor) V3, several improvements to the total ozone retrieval have been introduced that account for the varying ozone dependent contribution to rotational Raman scattering, includes a new cloud scheme, and uses the GOME measured effective albedo in the retrieval. In this paper the WFDOAS results have been compared with selected ground-based measurements from the WOUDC (World Ozone and UV Radiation Data Centre) that collects total ozone measurements from a global network of stations covering all seasons. From the global validation excellent agreement between WFDOAS and ground data was observed. The agreement lies within ±1%, and very little seasonal variations in the differences are found. In the polar regions and at high solar zenith angles, however, a positive bias varying between 5 and 8% is found near the polar night period. As a function of solar zenith angle as well as of the retrieved total ozone, the WFDOAS differences to ground polar data, however, show a much weaker dependence as compared to the operational GOME Data Processor Version3 of GOME that represents a significant improvement. Very few stations carry out simultaneous measurements by Brewer and Dobson spectrometers over an extended period (three years or more). Simultaneous Brewer and Dobson measurements from Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic (50.2N, 15.8E) and Hohenpeissenberg, Germany (47.8N, 11.0E) covering the period 1996-1999 have been compared with our GOME results. Agreement with Brewers are generally better than with the simultaneous Dobson measurements and this may be explained by the neglect of stratospheric (ozone) temperature correction in the standard ozone retrieval from the ground.
format Text
genre polar night
genre_facet polar night
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp3984
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
op_container_end_page 1355
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005
op_relation doi:10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/
op_source eISSN: 1680-7324
publishDate 2018
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp3984 2025-01-17T00:23:04+00:00 Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data Weber, M. Lamsal, L. N. Coldewey-Egbers, M. Bramstedt, K. Burrows, J. P. 2018-06-28 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005 2019-12-24T09:59:08Z This paper summarises the validation of GOME total ozone retrieved using the Weighting Function Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (WFDOAS) algorithm Version 1.0. This algorithm has been described in detail in a companion paper by Coldewey-Egbers et al. (2005). Compared to the operational GDP (GOME Data Processor) V3, several improvements to the total ozone retrieval have been introduced that account for the varying ozone dependent contribution to rotational Raman scattering, includes a new cloud scheme, and uses the GOME measured effective albedo in the retrieval. In this paper the WFDOAS results have been compared with selected ground-based measurements from the WOUDC (World Ozone and UV Radiation Data Centre) that collects total ozone measurements from a global network of stations covering all seasons. From the global validation excellent agreement between WFDOAS and ground data was observed. The agreement lies within ±1%, and very little seasonal variations in the differences are found. In the polar regions and at high solar zenith angles, however, a positive bias varying between 5 and 8% is found near the polar night period. As a function of solar zenith angle as well as of the retrieved total ozone, the WFDOAS differences to ground polar data, however, show a much weaker dependence as compared to the operational GOME Data Processor Version3 of GOME that represents a significant improvement. Very few stations carry out simultaneous measurements by Brewer and Dobson spectrometers over an extended period (three years or more). Simultaneous Brewer and Dobson measurements from Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic (50.2N, 15.8E) and Hohenpeissenberg, Germany (47.8N, 11.0E) covering the period 1996-1999 have been compared with our GOME results. Agreement with Brewers are generally better than with the simultaneous Dobson measurements and this may be explained by the neglect of stratospheric (ozone) temperature correction in the standard ozone retrieval from the ground. Text polar night Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 5 5 1341 1355
spellingShingle Weber, M.
Lamsal, L. N.
Coldewey-Egbers, M.
Bramstedt, K.
Burrows, J. P.
Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
title Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
title_full Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
title_fullStr Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
title_full_unstemmed Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
title_short Pole-to-pole validation of GOME WFDOAS total ozone with groundbased data
title_sort pole-to-pole validation of gome wfdoas total ozone with groundbased data
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-1341-2005
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/1341/2005/