Climate extremes in multi-model simulations of stratospheric aerosol and marine cloud brightening climate engineering

Simulations from a multi-model ensemble for the RCP4.5 climate change scenario for the 21st century, and for two solar radiation management (SRM) schemes (stratospheric sulfate injection (G3), SULF and marine cloud brightening by sea salt emission SALT) have been analysed in terms of changes in the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Aswathy, V. N., Boucher, O., Quaas, M., Niemeier, U., Muri, H., Mülmenstädt, J., Quaas, J.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9593-2015
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/9593/2015/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp28124
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp28124 2023-05-15T15:03:40+02:00 Climate extremes in multi-model simulations of stratospheric aerosol and marine cloud brightening climate engineering Aswathy, V. N. Boucher, O. Quaas, M. Niemeier, U. Muri, H. Mülmenstädt, J. Quaas, J. 2018-09-14 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9593-2015 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/9593/2015/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-15-9593-2015 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/9593/2015/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9593-2015 2019-12-24T09:53:08Z Simulations from a multi-model ensemble for the RCP4.5 climate change scenario for the 21st century, and for two solar radiation management (SRM) schemes (stratospheric sulfate injection (G3), SULF and marine cloud brightening by sea salt emission SALT) have been analysed in terms of changes in the mean and extremes of surface air temperature and precipitation. The climate engineering and termination periods are investigated. During the climate engineering period, both schemes, as intended, offset temperature increases by about 60 % globally, but are more effective in the low latitudes and exhibit some residual warming in the Arctic (especially in the case of SALT which is only applied in the low latitudes). In both climate engineering scenarios, extreme temperature changes are similar to the mean temperature changes over much of the globe. The exceptions are the mid- and high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere, where high temperatures (90th percentile of the distribution) of the climate engineering period compared to RCP4.5 control period rise less than the mean, and cold temperatures (10th percentile), much more than the mean. This aspect of the SRM schemes is also reflected in simulated reduction in the frost day frequency of occurrence for both schemes. However, summer day frequency of occurrence increases less in the SALT experiment than the SULF experiment, especially over the tropics. Precipitation extremes in the two SRM scenarios act differently – the SULF experiment more effectively mitigates extreme precipitation increases over land compared to the SALT experiment. A reduction in dry spell occurrence over land is observed in the SALT experiment. The SULF experiment has a slight increase in the length of dry spells. A strong termination effect is found for the two climate engineering schemes, with large temperature increases especially in the Arctic. Globally, SULF is more effective in reducing extreme temperature increases over land than SALT. Extreme precipitation increases over land is also more reduced in SULF than the SALT experiment. However, globally SALT decreases the frequency of dry spell length and reduces the occurrence of hot days compared to SULF. Text Arctic Climate change Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 15 16 9593 9610
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Simulations from a multi-model ensemble for the RCP4.5 climate change scenario for the 21st century, and for two solar radiation management (SRM) schemes (stratospheric sulfate injection (G3), SULF and marine cloud brightening by sea salt emission SALT) have been analysed in terms of changes in the mean and extremes of surface air temperature and precipitation. The climate engineering and termination periods are investigated. During the climate engineering period, both schemes, as intended, offset temperature increases by about 60 % globally, but are more effective in the low latitudes and exhibit some residual warming in the Arctic (especially in the case of SALT which is only applied in the low latitudes). In both climate engineering scenarios, extreme temperature changes are similar to the mean temperature changes over much of the globe. The exceptions are the mid- and high latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere, where high temperatures (90th percentile of the distribution) of the climate engineering period compared to RCP4.5 control period rise less than the mean, and cold temperatures (10th percentile), much more than the mean. This aspect of the SRM schemes is also reflected in simulated reduction in the frost day frequency of occurrence for both schemes. However, summer day frequency of occurrence increases less in the SALT experiment than the SULF experiment, especially over the tropics. Precipitation extremes in the two SRM scenarios act differently – the SULF experiment more effectively mitigates extreme precipitation increases over land compared to the SALT experiment. A reduction in dry spell occurrence over land is observed in the SALT experiment. The SULF experiment has a slight increase in the length of dry spells. A strong termination effect is found for the two climate engineering schemes, with large temperature increases especially in the Arctic. Globally, SULF is more effective in reducing extreme temperature increases over land than SALT. Extreme precipitation increases over land is also more reduced in SULF than the SALT experiment. However, globally SALT decreases the frequency of dry spell length and reduces the occurrence of hot days compared to SULF.
format Text
author Aswathy, V. N.
Boucher, O.
Quaas, M.
Niemeier, U.
Muri, H.
Mülmenstädt, J.
Quaas, J.
spellingShingle Aswathy, V. N.
Boucher, O.
Quaas, M.
Niemeier, U.
Muri, H.
Mülmenstädt, J.
Quaas, J.
Climate extremes in multi-model simulations of stratospheric aerosol and marine cloud brightening climate engineering
author_facet Aswathy, V. N.
Boucher, O.
Quaas, M.
Niemeier, U.
Muri, H.
Mülmenstädt, J.
Quaas, J.
author_sort Aswathy, V. N.
title Climate extremes in multi-model simulations of stratospheric aerosol and marine cloud brightening climate engineering
title_short Climate extremes in multi-model simulations of stratospheric aerosol and marine cloud brightening climate engineering
title_full Climate extremes in multi-model simulations of stratospheric aerosol and marine cloud brightening climate engineering
title_fullStr Climate extremes in multi-model simulations of stratospheric aerosol and marine cloud brightening climate engineering
title_full_unstemmed Climate extremes in multi-model simulations of stratospheric aerosol and marine cloud brightening climate engineering
title_sort climate extremes in multi-model simulations of stratospheric aerosol and marine cloud brightening climate engineering
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9593-2015
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/9593/2015/
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
op_source eISSN: 1680-7324
op_relation doi:10.5194/acp-15-9593-2015
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/15/9593/2015/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9593-2015
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 15
container_issue 16
container_start_page 9593
op_container_end_page 9610
_version_ 1766335515112505344