Evaluation of aerosol distributions in the GISS-TOMAS global aerosol microphysics model with remote sensing observations

The Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) and Angstrom Coefficient (AC) predictions in the GISS-TOMAS model of global aerosol microphysics are evaluated against remote sensing data from MODIS, MISR, and AERONET. The model AOD agrees well (within a factor of two) over polluted continental (or high sulfate), du...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Lee, Y. H., Adams, P. J.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2129-2010
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/2129/2010/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp1693
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp1693 2023-05-15T18:25:33+02:00 Evaluation of aerosol distributions in the GISS-TOMAS global aerosol microphysics model with remote sensing observations Lee, Y. H. Adams, P. J. 2018-01-15 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2129-2010 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/2129/2010/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-10-2129-2010 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/2129/2010/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2129-2010 2019-12-24T09:57:30Z The Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) and Angstrom Coefficient (AC) predictions in the GISS-TOMAS model of global aerosol microphysics are evaluated against remote sensing data from MODIS, MISR, and AERONET. The model AOD agrees well (within a factor of two) over polluted continental (or high sulfate), dusty, and moderate sea-salt regions but less well over the equatorial, high sea-salt, and biomass burning regions. Underprediction of sea-salt in the equatorial region is likely due to GCM meteorology (low wind speeds and high precipitation). For the Southern Ocean, overprediction of AOD is very likely due to high sea-salt emissions and perhaps aerosol water uptake in the model. However, uncertainties in cloud screening at high latitudes make it difficult to evaluate the model AOD there with the satellite-based AOD. AOD in biomass burning regions is underpredicted, a tendency found in other global models but more severely here. Using measurements from the LBA-SMOCC 2002 campaign, the surface-level OC concentration in the model are found to be underpredicted severely during the dry season while much less severely for EC concentration, suggesting the low AOD in the model is due to underpredictions in OM mass. The potential for errors in emissions and wet deposition to contribute to this bias is discussed. Text Southern Ocean Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Southern Ocean Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 10 5 2129 2144
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description The Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) and Angstrom Coefficient (AC) predictions in the GISS-TOMAS model of global aerosol microphysics are evaluated against remote sensing data from MODIS, MISR, and AERONET. The model AOD agrees well (within a factor of two) over polluted continental (or high sulfate), dusty, and moderate sea-salt regions but less well over the equatorial, high sea-salt, and biomass burning regions. Underprediction of sea-salt in the equatorial region is likely due to GCM meteorology (low wind speeds and high precipitation). For the Southern Ocean, overprediction of AOD is very likely due to high sea-salt emissions and perhaps aerosol water uptake in the model. However, uncertainties in cloud screening at high latitudes make it difficult to evaluate the model AOD there with the satellite-based AOD. AOD in biomass burning regions is underpredicted, a tendency found in other global models but more severely here. Using measurements from the LBA-SMOCC 2002 campaign, the surface-level OC concentration in the model are found to be underpredicted severely during the dry season while much less severely for EC concentration, suggesting the low AOD in the model is due to underpredictions in OM mass. The potential for errors in emissions and wet deposition to contribute to this bias is discussed.
format Text
author Lee, Y. H.
Adams, P. J.
spellingShingle Lee, Y. H.
Adams, P. J.
Evaluation of aerosol distributions in the GISS-TOMAS global aerosol microphysics model with remote sensing observations
author_facet Lee, Y. H.
Adams, P. J.
author_sort Lee, Y. H.
title Evaluation of aerosol distributions in the GISS-TOMAS global aerosol microphysics model with remote sensing observations
title_short Evaluation of aerosol distributions in the GISS-TOMAS global aerosol microphysics model with remote sensing observations
title_full Evaluation of aerosol distributions in the GISS-TOMAS global aerosol microphysics model with remote sensing observations
title_fullStr Evaluation of aerosol distributions in the GISS-TOMAS global aerosol microphysics model with remote sensing observations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of aerosol distributions in the GISS-TOMAS global aerosol microphysics model with remote sensing observations
title_sort evaluation of aerosol distributions in the giss-tomas global aerosol microphysics model with remote sensing observations
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2129-2010
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/2129/2010/
geographic Southern Ocean
geographic_facet Southern Ocean
genre Southern Ocean
genre_facet Southern Ocean
op_source eISSN: 1680-7324
op_relation doi:10.5194/acp-10-2129-2010
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/10/2129/2010/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2129-2010
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 10
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2129
op_container_end_page 2144
_version_ 1766207082765221888