Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies
Observations made during late summer in the central Arctic Ocean, as part of the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS), are used to evaluate cloud and vertical temperature structure in the Met Office Unified Model (MetUM). The observation period can be split into 5 regimes; the first two regimes h...
Published in: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/3419/2012/ |
id |
ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp13814 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp13814 2023-05-15T13:11:26+02:00 Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies Birch, C. E. Brooks, I. M. Tjernström, M. Shupe, M. D. Mauritsen, T. Sedlar, J. Lock, A. P. Earnshaw, P. Persson, P. O. G. Milton, S. F. Leck, C. 2018-01-15 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/3419/2012/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/3419/2012/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012 2019-12-24T09:56:20Z Observations made during late summer in the central Arctic Ocean, as part of the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS), are used to evaluate cloud and vertical temperature structure in the Met Office Unified Model (MetUM). The observation period can be split into 5 regimes; the first two regimes had a large number of frontal systems, which were associated with deep cloud. During the remainder of the campaign a layer of low-level cloud occurred, typical of central Arctic summer conditions, along with two periods of greatly reduced cloud cover. The short-range operational NWP forecasts could not accurately reproduce the observed variations in near-surface temperature. A major source of this error was found to be the temperature-dependant surface albedo parameterisation scheme. The model reproduced the low-level cloud layer, though it was too thin, too shallow, and in a boundary-layer that was too frequently well-mixed. The model was also unable to reproduce the observed periods of reduced cloud cover, which were associated with very low cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations (<1 cm −3 ). As with most global NWP models, the MetUM does not have a prognostic aerosol/cloud scheme but uses a constant CCN concentration of 100 cm −3 over all marine environments. It is therefore unable to represent the low CCN number concentrations and the rapid variations in concentration frequently observed in the central Arctic during late summer. Experiments with a single-column model configuration of the MetUM show that reducing model CCN number concentrations to observed values reduces the amount of cloud, increases the near-surface stability, and improves the representation of both the surface radiation fluxes and the surface temperature. The model is shown to be sensitive to CCN only when number concentrations are less than 10–20 cm −3 . Text albedo Arctic Arctic Ocean Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Arctic Ocean Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 12 7 3419 3435 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Copernicus Publications: E-Journals |
op_collection_id |
ftcopernicus |
language |
English |
description |
Observations made during late summer in the central Arctic Ocean, as part of the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS), are used to evaluate cloud and vertical temperature structure in the Met Office Unified Model (MetUM). The observation period can be split into 5 regimes; the first two regimes had a large number of frontal systems, which were associated with deep cloud. During the remainder of the campaign a layer of low-level cloud occurred, typical of central Arctic summer conditions, along with two periods of greatly reduced cloud cover. The short-range operational NWP forecasts could not accurately reproduce the observed variations in near-surface temperature. A major source of this error was found to be the temperature-dependant surface albedo parameterisation scheme. The model reproduced the low-level cloud layer, though it was too thin, too shallow, and in a boundary-layer that was too frequently well-mixed. The model was also unable to reproduce the observed periods of reduced cloud cover, which were associated with very low cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations (<1 cm −3 ). As with most global NWP models, the MetUM does not have a prognostic aerosol/cloud scheme but uses a constant CCN concentration of 100 cm −3 over all marine environments. It is therefore unable to represent the low CCN number concentrations and the rapid variations in concentration frequently observed in the central Arctic during late summer. Experiments with a single-column model configuration of the MetUM show that reducing model CCN number concentrations to observed values reduces the amount of cloud, increases the near-surface stability, and improves the representation of both the surface radiation fluxes and the surface temperature. The model is shown to be sensitive to CCN only when number concentrations are less than 10–20 cm −3 . |
format |
Text |
author |
Birch, C. E. Brooks, I. M. Tjernström, M. Shupe, M. D. Mauritsen, T. Sedlar, J. Lock, A. P. Earnshaw, P. Persson, P. O. G. Milton, S. F. Leck, C. |
spellingShingle |
Birch, C. E. Brooks, I. M. Tjernström, M. Shupe, M. D. Mauritsen, T. Sedlar, J. Lock, A. P. Earnshaw, P. Persson, P. O. G. Milton, S. F. Leck, C. Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies |
author_facet |
Birch, C. E. Brooks, I. M. Tjernström, M. Shupe, M. D. Mauritsen, T. Sedlar, J. Lock, A. P. Earnshaw, P. Persson, P. O. G. Milton, S. F. Leck, C. |
author_sort |
Birch, C. E. |
title |
Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies |
title_short |
Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies |
title_full |
Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies |
title_fullStr |
Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies |
title_sort |
modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to ccn in the central arctic: ascos case studies |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/3419/2012/ |
geographic |
Arctic Arctic Ocean |
geographic_facet |
Arctic Arctic Ocean |
genre |
albedo Arctic Arctic Ocean |
genre_facet |
albedo Arctic Arctic Ocean |
op_source |
eISSN: 1680-7324 |
op_relation |
doi:10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/3419/2012/ |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012 |
container_title |
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
container_volume |
12 |
container_issue |
7 |
container_start_page |
3419 |
op_container_end_page |
3435 |
_version_ |
1766247394082553856 |