Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies

Observations made during late summer in the central Arctic Ocean, as part of the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS), are used to evaluate cloud and vertical temperature structure in the Met Office Unified Model (MetUM). The observation period can be split into 5 regimes; the first two regimes h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Birch, C. E., Brooks, I. M., Tjernström, M., Shupe, M. D., Mauritsen, T., Sedlar, J., Lock, A. P., Earnshaw, P., Persson, P. O. G., Milton, S. F., Leck, C.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/3419/2012/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp13814
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp13814 2023-05-15T13:11:26+02:00 Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies Birch, C. E. Brooks, I. M. Tjernström, M. Shupe, M. D. Mauritsen, T. Sedlar, J. Lock, A. P. Earnshaw, P. Persson, P. O. G. Milton, S. F. Leck, C. 2018-01-15 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/3419/2012/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012 https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/3419/2012/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2018 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012 2019-12-24T09:56:20Z Observations made during late summer in the central Arctic Ocean, as part of the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS), are used to evaluate cloud and vertical temperature structure in the Met Office Unified Model (MetUM). The observation period can be split into 5 regimes; the first two regimes had a large number of frontal systems, which were associated with deep cloud. During the remainder of the campaign a layer of low-level cloud occurred, typical of central Arctic summer conditions, along with two periods of greatly reduced cloud cover. The short-range operational NWP forecasts could not accurately reproduce the observed variations in near-surface temperature. A major source of this error was found to be the temperature-dependant surface albedo parameterisation scheme. The model reproduced the low-level cloud layer, though it was too thin, too shallow, and in a boundary-layer that was too frequently well-mixed. The model was also unable to reproduce the observed periods of reduced cloud cover, which were associated with very low cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations (<1 cm −3 ). As with most global NWP models, the MetUM does not have a prognostic aerosol/cloud scheme but uses a constant CCN concentration of 100 cm −3 over all marine environments. It is therefore unable to represent the low CCN number concentrations and the rapid variations in concentration frequently observed in the central Arctic during late summer. Experiments with a single-column model configuration of the MetUM show that reducing model CCN number concentrations to observed values reduces the amount of cloud, increases the near-surface stability, and improves the representation of both the surface radiation fluxes and the surface temperature. The model is shown to be sensitive to CCN only when number concentrations are less than 10–20 cm −3 . Text albedo Arctic Arctic Ocean Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Arctic Ocean Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 12 7 3419 3435
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description Observations made during late summer in the central Arctic Ocean, as part of the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS), are used to evaluate cloud and vertical temperature structure in the Met Office Unified Model (MetUM). The observation period can be split into 5 regimes; the first two regimes had a large number of frontal systems, which were associated with deep cloud. During the remainder of the campaign a layer of low-level cloud occurred, typical of central Arctic summer conditions, along with two periods of greatly reduced cloud cover. The short-range operational NWP forecasts could not accurately reproduce the observed variations in near-surface temperature. A major source of this error was found to be the temperature-dependant surface albedo parameterisation scheme. The model reproduced the low-level cloud layer, though it was too thin, too shallow, and in a boundary-layer that was too frequently well-mixed. The model was also unable to reproduce the observed periods of reduced cloud cover, which were associated with very low cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations (<1 cm −3 ). As with most global NWP models, the MetUM does not have a prognostic aerosol/cloud scheme but uses a constant CCN concentration of 100 cm −3 over all marine environments. It is therefore unable to represent the low CCN number concentrations and the rapid variations in concentration frequently observed in the central Arctic during late summer. Experiments with a single-column model configuration of the MetUM show that reducing model CCN number concentrations to observed values reduces the amount of cloud, increases the near-surface stability, and improves the representation of both the surface radiation fluxes and the surface temperature. The model is shown to be sensitive to CCN only when number concentrations are less than 10–20 cm −3 .
format Text
author Birch, C. E.
Brooks, I. M.
Tjernström, M.
Shupe, M. D.
Mauritsen, T.
Sedlar, J.
Lock, A. P.
Earnshaw, P.
Persson, P. O. G.
Milton, S. F.
Leck, C.
spellingShingle Birch, C. E.
Brooks, I. M.
Tjernström, M.
Shupe, M. D.
Mauritsen, T.
Sedlar, J.
Lock, A. P.
Earnshaw, P.
Persson, P. O. G.
Milton, S. F.
Leck, C.
Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies
author_facet Birch, C. E.
Brooks, I. M.
Tjernström, M.
Shupe, M. D.
Mauritsen, T.
Sedlar, J.
Lock, A. P.
Earnshaw, P.
Persson, P. O. G.
Milton, S. F.
Leck, C.
author_sort Birch, C. E.
title Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies
title_short Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies
title_full Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies
title_fullStr Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies
title_full_unstemmed Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies
title_sort modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to ccn in the central arctic: ascos case studies
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/3419/2012/
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre albedo
Arctic
Arctic Ocean
genre_facet albedo
Arctic
Arctic Ocean
op_source eISSN: 1680-7324
op_relation doi:10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/12/3419/2012/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 12
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3419
op_container_end_page 3435
_version_ 1766247394082553856