Arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance

As the third most important greenhouse gas (GHG) after carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane ( CH 4 ), tropospheric ozone (O 3 ) is also an air pollutant causing damage to human health and ecosystems. This study brings together recent research on observations and modeling of tropospheric O 3 in the Arc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Whaley, Cynthia H., Law, Kathy S., Hjorth, Jens Liengaard, Skov, Henrik, Arnold, Stephen R., Langner, Joakim, Pernov, Jakob Boyd, Bergeron, Garance, Bourgeois, Ilann, Christensen, Jesper H., Chien, Rong-You, Deushi, Makoto, Dong, Xinyi, Effertz, Peter, Faluvegi, Gregory, Flanner, Mark, Fu, Joshua S., Gauss, Michael, Huey, Greg, Im, Ulas, Kivi, Rigel, Marelle, Louis, Onishi, Tatsuo, Oshima, Naga, Petropavlovskikh, Irina, Peischl, Jeff, Plummer, David A., Pozzoli, Luca, Raut, Jean-Christophe, Ryerson, Tom, Skeie, Ragnhild, Solberg, Sverre, Thomas, Manu A., Thompson, Chelsea, Tsigaridis, Kostas, Tsyro, Svetlana, Turnock, Steven T., Salzen, Knut, Tarasick, David W.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-637-2023
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/637/2023/
id ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp102901
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopernicus:oai:publications.copernicus.org:acp102901 2023-05-15T14:37:36+02:00 Arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance Whaley, Cynthia H. Law, Kathy S. Hjorth, Jens Liengaard Skov, Henrik Arnold, Stephen R. Langner, Joakim Pernov, Jakob Boyd Bergeron, Garance Bourgeois, Ilann Christensen, Jesper H. Chien, Rong-You Deushi, Makoto Dong, Xinyi Effertz, Peter Faluvegi, Gregory Flanner, Mark Fu, Joshua S. Gauss, Michael Huey, Greg Im, Ulas Kivi, Rigel Marelle, Louis Onishi, Tatsuo Oshima, Naga Petropavlovskikh, Irina Peischl, Jeff Plummer, David A. Pozzoli, Luca Raut, Jean-Christophe Ryerson, Tom Skeie, Ragnhild Solberg, Sverre Thomas, Manu A. Thompson, Chelsea Tsigaridis, Kostas Tsyro, Svetlana Turnock, Steven T. Salzen, Knut Tarasick, David W. 2023-01-16 application/pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-637-2023 https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/637/2023/ eng eng doi:10.5194/acp-23-637-2023 https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/637/2023/ eISSN: 1680-7324 Text 2023 ftcopernicus https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-637-2023 2023-01-23T17:22:43Z As the third most important greenhouse gas (GHG) after carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane ( CH 4 ), tropospheric ozone (O 3 ) is also an air pollutant causing damage to human health and ecosystems. This study brings together recent research on observations and modeling of tropospheric O 3 in the Arctic, a rapidly warming and sensitive environment. At different locations in the Arctic, the observed surface O 3 seasonal cycles are quite different. Coastal Arctic locations, for example, have a minimum in the springtime due to O 3 depletion events resulting from surface bromine chemistry. In contrast, other Arctic locations have a maximum in the spring. The 12 state-of-the-art models used in this study lack the surface halogen chemistry needed to simulate coastal Arctic surface O 3 depletion in the springtime; however, the multi-model median (MMM) has accurate seasonal cycles at non-coastal Arctic locations. There is a large amount of variability among models, which has been previously reported, and we show that there continues to be no convergence among models or improved accuracy in simulating tropospheric O 3 and its precursor species. The MMM underestimates Arctic surface O 3 by 5 % to 15 % depending on the location. The vertical distribution of tropospheric O 3 is studied from recent ozonesonde measurements and the models. The models are highly variable, simulating free-tropospheric O 3 within a range of ±50 % depending on the model and the altitude. The MMM performs best, within ±8 % for most locations and seasons. However, nearly all models overestimate O 3 near the tropopause ( ∼300 hPa or ∼8 km), likely due to ongoing issues with underestimating the altitude of the tropopause and excessive downward transport of stratospheric O 3 at high latitudes. For example, the MMM is biased high by about 20 % at Eureka. Observed and simulated O 3 precursors (CO, NO x , and reservoir PAN) are evaluated throughout the troposphere. Models underestimate wintertime CO everywhere, likely due to a combination of ... Text Arctic Human health Copernicus Publications: E-Journals Arctic Eureka ENVELOPE(-85.940,-85.940,79.990,79.990) Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 23 1 637 661
institution Open Polar
collection Copernicus Publications: E-Journals
op_collection_id ftcopernicus
language English
description As the third most important greenhouse gas (GHG) after carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane ( CH 4 ), tropospheric ozone (O 3 ) is also an air pollutant causing damage to human health and ecosystems. This study brings together recent research on observations and modeling of tropospheric O 3 in the Arctic, a rapidly warming and sensitive environment. At different locations in the Arctic, the observed surface O 3 seasonal cycles are quite different. Coastal Arctic locations, for example, have a minimum in the springtime due to O 3 depletion events resulting from surface bromine chemistry. In contrast, other Arctic locations have a maximum in the spring. The 12 state-of-the-art models used in this study lack the surface halogen chemistry needed to simulate coastal Arctic surface O 3 depletion in the springtime; however, the multi-model median (MMM) has accurate seasonal cycles at non-coastal Arctic locations. There is a large amount of variability among models, which has been previously reported, and we show that there continues to be no convergence among models or improved accuracy in simulating tropospheric O 3 and its precursor species. The MMM underestimates Arctic surface O 3 by 5 % to 15 % depending on the location. The vertical distribution of tropospheric O 3 is studied from recent ozonesonde measurements and the models. The models are highly variable, simulating free-tropospheric O 3 within a range of ±50 % depending on the model and the altitude. The MMM performs best, within ±8 % for most locations and seasons. However, nearly all models overestimate O 3 near the tropopause ( ∼300 hPa or ∼8 km), likely due to ongoing issues with underestimating the altitude of the tropopause and excessive downward transport of stratospheric O 3 at high latitudes. For example, the MMM is biased high by about 20 % at Eureka. Observed and simulated O 3 precursors (CO, NO x , and reservoir PAN) are evaluated throughout the troposphere. Models underestimate wintertime CO everywhere, likely due to a combination of ...
format Text
author Whaley, Cynthia H.
Law, Kathy S.
Hjorth, Jens Liengaard
Skov, Henrik
Arnold, Stephen R.
Langner, Joakim
Pernov, Jakob Boyd
Bergeron, Garance
Bourgeois, Ilann
Christensen, Jesper H.
Chien, Rong-You
Deushi, Makoto
Dong, Xinyi
Effertz, Peter
Faluvegi, Gregory
Flanner, Mark
Fu, Joshua S.
Gauss, Michael
Huey, Greg
Im, Ulas
Kivi, Rigel
Marelle, Louis
Onishi, Tatsuo
Oshima, Naga
Petropavlovskikh, Irina
Peischl, Jeff
Plummer, David A.
Pozzoli, Luca
Raut, Jean-Christophe
Ryerson, Tom
Skeie, Ragnhild
Solberg, Sverre
Thomas, Manu A.
Thompson, Chelsea
Tsigaridis, Kostas
Tsyro, Svetlana
Turnock, Steven T.
Salzen, Knut
Tarasick, David W.
spellingShingle Whaley, Cynthia H.
Law, Kathy S.
Hjorth, Jens Liengaard
Skov, Henrik
Arnold, Stephen R.
Langner, Joakim
Pernov, Jakob Boyd
Bergeron, Garance
Bourgeois, Ilann
Christensen, Jesper H.
Chien, Rong-You
Deushi, Makoto
Dong, Xinyi
Effertz, Peter
Faluvegi, Gregory
Flanner, Mark
Fu, Joshua S.
Gauss, Michael
Huey, Greg
Im, Ulas
Kivi, Rigel
Marelle, Louis
Onishi, Tatsuo
Oshima, Naga
Petropavlovskikh, Irina
Peischl, Jeff
Plummer, David A.
Pozzoli, Luca
Raut, Jean-Christophe
Ryerson, Tom
Skeie, Ragnhild
Solberg, Sverre
Thomas, Manu A.
Thompson, Chelsea
Tsigaridis, Kostas
Tsyro, Svetlana
Turnock, Steven T.
Salzen, Knut
Tarasick, David W.
Arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance
author_facet Whaley, Cynthia H.
Law, Kathy S.
Hjorth, Jens Liengaard
Skov, Henrik
Arnold, Stephen R.
Langner, Joakim
Pernov, Jakob Boyd
Bergeron, Garance
Bourgeois, Ilann
Christensen, Jesper H.
Chien, Rong-You
Deushi, Makoto
Dong, Xinyi
Effertz, Peter
Faluvegi, Gregory
Flanner, Mark
Fu, Joshua S.
Gauss, Michael
Huey, Greg
Im, Ulas
Kivi, Rigel
Marelle, Louis
Onishi, Tatsuo
Oshima, Naga
Petropavlovskikh, Irina
Peischl, Jeff
Plummer, David A.
Pozzoli, Luca
Raut, Jean-Christophe
Ryerson, Tom
Skeie, Ragnhild
Solberg, Sverre
Thomas, Manu A.
Thompson, Chelsea
Tsigaridis, Kostas
Tsyro, Svetlana
Turnock, Steven T.
Salzen, Knut
Tarasick, David W.
author_sort Whaley, Cynthia H.
title Arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance
title_short Arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance
title_full Arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance
title_fullStr Arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance
title_full_unstemmed Arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance
title_sort arctic tropospheric ozone: assessment of current knowledge and model performance
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-637-2023
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/637/2023/
long_lat ENVELOPE(-85.940,-85.940,79.990,79.990)
geographic Arctic
Eureka
geographic_facet Arctic
Eureka
genre Arctic
Human health
genre_facet Arctic
Human health
op_source eISSN: 1680-7324
op_relation doi:10.5194/acp-23-637-2023
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/23/637/2023/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-637-2023
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 23
container_issue 1
container_start_page 637
op_container_end_page 661
_version_ 1766309828913790976