'How we use our nature.' Sustainability and indigineity in Greenlandic discourse.

In the network of signs and symbols that add meaning to the concept of sustainability, indigeneity entails a significant denominator. Indigenous peoples are expected to build their community on values derived from ‘indigenous knowledge’, different from Western standards. However, the debate about na...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Thisted, Kirsten
Other Authors: Gad, Ulrik Pram, Strandsbjerg, Jeppe
Format: Book Part
Language:Danish
Published: Routledge 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://curis.ku.dk/portal/da/publications/how-we-use-our-nature-sustainability-and-indigineity-in-greenlandic-discourse(9cc4bca5-6849-4fa5-a63d-432e91020a93).html
id ftcopenhagenunip:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/9cc4bca5-6849-4fa5-a63d-432e91020a93
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcopenhagenunip:oai:pure.atira.dk:publications/9cc4bca5-6849-4fa5-a63d-432e91020a93 2023-05-15T14:24:16+02:00 'How we use our nature.' Sustainability and indigineity in Greenlandic discourse. Thisted, Kirsten Gad, Ulrik Pram Strandsbjerg, Jeppe 2018-10-22 https://curis.ku.dk/portal/da/publications/how-we-use-our-nature-sustainability-and-indigineity-in-greenlandic-discourse(9cc4bca5-6849-4fa5-a63d-432e91020a93).html dan dan Routledge info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess Thisted , K 2018 , 'How we use our nature.' Sustainability and indigineity in Greenlandic discourse. i U P Gad & J Strandsbjerg (red) , The Politics of Sustainability in the Arctic: Reconfiguring Identity, Space, and Time . Routledge , s. 176-194 . bookPart 2018 ftcopenhagenunip 2021-09-23T18:15:48Z In the network of signs and symbols that add meaning to the concept of sustainability, indigeneity entails a significant denominator. Indigenous peoples are expected to build their community on values derived from ‘indigenous knowledge’, different from Western standards. However, the debate about nature preservation has a long history in Greenland, which has made the connection between indigeneity and sustainability a lot more complex and contested. The chapter looks into this history in order to better understand the complicated situation of today, where non-Western ontology plays a minor role in Greenlandic environmental politics. First, a section juxtaposes the difficulties of translating the concept of sustainability into the Greenlandic language with the efforts made to claim it as Greenlandic, and a section revisits the literature on the relation between man and nature in pre-colonial and colonial discourses. Then a section analyses the way knowledge and authority were negotiated in debates on progress and conservation as they unfolded in the Greenlandic press in the early twentieth century, a period crucially reconfiguring life and identities. Finally, a section explicates how local – rather than indigenous – knowledge is presented as that which makes colonialism unsustainable, and how local knowledge is later ‘nationalized’. In sum, a brief conclusion finds that the cultural heritage from the Inuit past is central to many Greenlanders’ self-identification, as well as to Greenland’s brand as a nation. However, the negotiated in debates on progress and conservation as they unfolded in the Greenlandic press in the early twentieth century, a period crucially reconfiguring life and identities. Finally, a section explicates how local – rather than indigenous – knowledge is presented as that which makes colonialism unsustainable, and how local knowledge is later ‘nationalized’. In sum, a brief conclusion finds that the cultural heritage from the Inuit past is central to many Greenlanders’ self-identification, as well as to Greenland’s brand as a nation. However, the approach guiding how the Self-Government works with the sustainability concept affirms modernity and nation, rather than tradition and indigeneity. Book Part Arctic Greenland greenlander* greenlandic inuit University of Copenhagen: Research Greenland
institution Open Polar
collection University of Copenhagen: Research
op_collection_id ftcopenhagenunip
language Danish
description In the network of signs and symbols that add meaning to the concept of sustainability, indigeneity entails a significant denominator. Indigenous peoples are expected to build their community on values derived from ‘indigenous knowledge’, different from Western standards. However, the debate about nature preservation has a long history in Greenland, which has made the connection between indigeneity and sustainability a lot more complex and contested. The chapter looks into this history in order to better understand the complicated situation of today, where non-Western ontology plays a minor role in Greenlandic environmental politics. First, a section juxtaposes the difficulties of translating the concept of sustainability into the Greenlandic language with the efforts made to claim it as Greenlandic, and a section revisits the literature on the relation between man and nature in pre-colonial and colonial discourses. Then a section analyses the way knowledge and authority were negotiated in debates on progress and conservation as they unfolded in the Greenlandic press in the early twentieth century, a period crucially reconfiguring life and identities. Finally, a section explicates how local – rather than indigenous – knowledge is presented as that which makes colonialism unsustainable, and how local knowledge is later ‘nationalized’. In sum, a brief conclusion finds that the cultural heritage from the Inuit past is central to many Greenlanders’ self-identification, as well as to Greenland’s brand as a nation. However, the negotiated in debates on progress and conservation as they unfolded in the Greenlandic press in the early twentieth century, a period crucially reconfiguring life and identities. Finally, a section explicates how local – rather than indigenous – knowledge is presented as that which makes colonialism unsustainable, and how local knowledge is later ‘nationalized’. In sum, a brief conclusion finds that the cultural heritage from the Inuit past is central to many Greenlanders’ self-identification, as well as to Greenland’s brand as a nation. However, the approach guiding how the Self-Government works with the sustainability concept affirms modernity and nation, rather than tradition and indigeneity.
author2 Gad, Ulrik Pram
Strandsbjerg, Jeppe
format Book Part
author Thisted, Kirsten
spellingShingle Thisted, Kirsten
'How we use our nature.' Sustainability and indigineity in Greenlandic discourse.
author_facet Thisted, Kirsten
author_sort Thisted, Kirsten
title 'How we use our nature.' Sustainability and indigineity in Greenlandic discourse.
title_short 'How we use our nature.' Sustainability and indigineity in Greenlandic discourse.
title_full 'How we use our nature.' Sustainability and indigineity in Greenlandic discourse.
title_fullStr 'How we use our nature.' Sustainability and indigineity in Greenlandic discourse.
title_full_unstemmed 'How we use our nature.' Sustainability and indigineity in Greenlandic discourse.
title_sort 'how we use our nature.' sustainability and indigineity in greenlandic discourse.
publisher Routledge
publishDate 2018
url https://curis.ku.dk/portal/da/publications/how-we-use-our-nature-sustainability-and-indigineity-in-greenlandic-discourse(9cc4bca5-6849-4fa5-a63d-432e91020a93).html
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Arctic
Greenland
greenlander*
greenlandic
inuit
genre_facet Arctic
Greenland
greenlander*
greenlandic
inuit
op_source Thisted , K 2018 , 'How we use our nature.' Sustainability and indigineity in Greenlandic discourse. i U P Gad & J Strandsbjerg (red) , The Politics of Sustainability in the Arctic: Reconfiguring Identity, Space, and Time . Routledge , s. 176-194 .
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
_version_ 1766296716405899264