Effects of aquaculture on wild fish populations: a synthesis of data

The potential adverse environmental effects of aquaculture have been the subject of considerable attention in both the media and the scientific literature. We undertook a synthesis of the published scientific literature, primarily concerning Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), to assess the current data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental Reviews
Main Authors: Weir, Laura K., Grant, James W.A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: NRC Research Press 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/7541/
https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/7541/1/Grant_EnvironmentalReviews2005.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1139/a05-012
id ftconcordiauniv:oai:https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca:7541
record_format openpolar
spelling ftconcordiauniv:oai:https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca:7541 2023-05-15T15:31:19+02:00 Effects of aquaculture on wild fish populations: a synthesis of data Weir, Laura K. Grant, James W.A. 2005 text https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/7541/ https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/7541/1/Grant_EnvironmentalReviews2005.pdf https://doi.org/10.1139/a05-012 en eng NRC Research Press https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/7541/1/Grant_EnvironmentalReviews2005.pdf Weir, Laura K. and Grant, James W.A. (2005) Effects of aquaculture on wild fish populations: a synthesis of data. Environmental Reviews, 13 (4). pp. 145-168. ISSN 1181-8700 doi:10.1139/a05-012 Article PeerReviewed 2005 ftconcordiauniv https://doi.org/10.1139/a05-012 2022-05-28T18:57:33Z The potential adverse environmental effects of aquaculture have been the subject of considerable attention in both the media and the scientific literature. We undertook a synthesis of the published scientific literature, primarily concerning Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), to assess the current data available regarding these potential effects. No data are available to test for the direct effects of aquaculture organisms on the demographics of wild fish populations. However, seven studies show that escaped salmon in the wild have lower fitness, as measured by survival and reproductive success, than native salmon. Thirteen other studies, encompassing 91 different traits, provide strong evidence of phenotypic differences between farmed and wild salmon, presumably because of artificial selection in the aquaculture environment. An additional 10 studies have documented significant genetic differences between farmed salmon and the wild fish with which they will interact, or potentially interact. Given the paucity of data regarding actual population consequences of escaped farmed fish on wild populations, and the documented differences between the two types of fish, it seems prudent to treat farmed fish as exotic species with potentially negative consequences for wild populations, particularly when the latter are of conservation concern.Key words: aquaculture, Atlantic salmon, artificial selection, fitness, introgression. Article in Journal/Newspaper Atlantic salmon Salmo salar Spectrum: Concordia University Research Repository (Montreal) Environmental Reviews 13 4 145 168
institution Open Polar
collection Spectrum: Concordia University Research Repository (Montreal)
op_collection_id ftconcordiauniv
language English
description The potential adverse environmental effects of aquaculture have been the subject of considerable attention in both the media and the scientific literature. We undertook a synthesis of the published scientific literature, primarily concerning Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), to assess the current data available regarding these potential effects. No data are available to test for the direct effects of aquaculture organisms on the demographics of wild fish populations. However, seven studies show that escaped salmon in the wild have lower fitness, as measured by survival and reproductive success, than native salmon. Thirteen other studies, encompassing 91 different traits, provide strong evidence of phenotypic differences between farmed and wild salmon, presumably because of artificial selection in the aquaculture environment. An additional 10 studies have documented significant genetic differences between farmed salmon and the wild fish with which they will interact, or potentially interact. Given the paucity of data regarding actual population consequences of escaped farmed fish on wild populations, and the documented differences between the two types of fish, it seems prudent to treat farmed fish as exotic species with potentially negative consequences for wild populations, particularly when the latter are of conservation concern.Key words: aquaculture, Atlantic salmon, artificial selection, fitness, introgression.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Weir, Laura K.
Grant, James W.A.
spellingShingle Weir, Laura K.
Grant, James W.A.
Effects of aquaculture on wild fish populations: a synthesis of data
author_facet Weir, Laura K.
Grant, James W.A.
author_sort Weir, Laura K.
title Effects of aquaculture on wild fish populations: a synthesis of data
title_short Effects of aquaculture on wild fish populations: a synthesis of data
title_full Effects of aquaculture on wild fish populations: a synthesis of data
title_fullStr Effects of aquaculture on wild fish populations: a synthesis of data
title_full_unstemmed Effects of aquaculture on wild fish populations: a synthesis of data
title_sort effects of aquaculture on wild fish populations: a synthesis of data
publisher NRC Research Press
publishDate 2005
url https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/7541/
https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/7541/1/Grant_EnvironmentalReviews2005.pdf
https://doi.org/10.1139/a05-012
genre Atlantic salmon
Salmo salar
genre_facet Atlantic salmon
Salmo salar
op_relation https://spectrum.library.concordia.ca/id/eprint/7541/1/Grant_EnvironmentalReviews2005.pdf
Weir, Laura K. and Grant, James W.A. (2005) Effects of aquaculture on wild fish populations: a synthesis of data. Environmental Reviews, 13 (4). pp. 145-168. ISSN 1181-8700
doi:10.1139/a05-012
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1139/a05-012
container_title Environmental Reviews
container_volume 13
container_issue 4
container_start_page 145
op_container_end_page 168
_version_ 1766361812722253824