Subseasonal forecast of Arctic sea ice concentration via statistical approaches

Subseasonal forecast of Arctic sea ice has received less attention than the seasonal counterpart, as prediction skill of dynamical models generally exhibits a significant drop in the extended range (> 2 weeks). The predictability of pan-Arctic sea ice concentration is evaluated by statistical mod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wang, Lei, Yuan, Xiaojun, Li, Cuihua
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7916/cf3g-tt37
id ftcolumbiauniv:oai:academiccommons.columbia.edu:10.7916/cf3g-tt37
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcolumbiauniv:oai:academiccommons.columbia.edu:10.7916/cf3g-tt37 2023-05-15T14:43:55+02:00 Subseasonal forecast of Arctic sea ice concentration via statistical approaches Wang, Lei Yuan, Xiaojun Li, Cuihua 2019 https://doi.org/10.7916/cf3g-tt37 English eng https://doi.org/10.7916/cf3g-tt37 Sea ice Statistical weather forecasting Climatology Articles 2019 ftcolumbiauniv https://doi.org/10.7916/cf3g-tt37 2022-01-29T23:21:24Z Subseasonal forecast of Arctic sea ice has received less attention than the seasonal counterpart, as prediction skill of dynamical models generally exhibits a significant drop in the extended range (> 2 weeks). The predictability of pan-Arctic sea ice concentration is evaluated by statistical models using weekly time series for the first time. Two statistical models, the vector auto-regressive model and the vector Markov model, are evaluated for predicting the 1979–2014 weekly Arctic sea ice concentration (SIC) anomalies at the subseasonal time scale, using combined information from the sea ice, atmosphere and ocean. The vector auto-regressive model is slightly inferior to the vector Markov model for the subseasonal forecast of Arctic SIC, as the latter captures more effectively the subseasonal transition of the underlying dynamics. The cross-validated forecast skill of the vector Markov model is found to be superior to both the anomaly persistence and damped anomaly persistence at lead times > 3 weeks. Surface air and ocean temperatures can be included to further improve the forecast skill for lead times > 4 weeks. The long-term trends in SIC due to global warming and its polar amplification contribute significantly to the subseasonal sea ice predictability in summer and fall. The vector Markov model shows much higher skill than the NCEP CFSv2 model for lead times of 3–6 weeks, as evaluated for the period of 1999–2010. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Global warming Sea ice Columbia University: Academic Commons Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Columbia University: Academic Commons
op_collection_id ftcolumbiauniv
language English
topic Sea ice
Statistical weather forecasting
Climatology
spellingShingle Sea ice
Statistical weather forecasting
Climatology
Wang, Lei
Yuan, Xiaojun
Li, Cuihua
Subseasonal forecast of Arctic sea ice concentration via statistical approaches
topic_facet Sea ice
Statistical weather forecasting
Climatology
description Subseasonal forecast of Arctic sea ice has received less attention than the seasonal counterpart, as prediction skill of dynamical models generally exhibits a significant drop in the extended range (> 2 weeks). The predictability of pan-Arctic sea ice concentration is evaluated by statistical models using weekly time series for the first time. Two statistical models, the vector auto-regressive model and the vector Markov model, are evaluated for predicting the 1979–2014 weekly Arctic sea ice concentration (SIC) anomalies at the subseasonal time scale, using combined information from the sea ice, atmosphere and ocean. The vector auto-regressive model is slightly inferior to the vector Markov model for the subseasonal forecast of Arctic SIC, as the latter captures more effectively the subseasonal transition of the underlying dynamics. The cross-validated forecast skill of the vector Markov model is found to be superior to both the anomaly persistence and damped anomaly persistence at lead times > 3 weeks. Surface air and ocean temperatures can be included to further improve the forecast skill for lead times > 4 weeks. The long-term trends in SIC due to global warming and its polar amplification contribute significantly to the subseasonal sea ice predictability in summer and fall. The vector Markov model shows much higher skill than the NCEP CFSv2 model for lead times of 3–6 weeks, as evaluated for the period of 1999–2010.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Wang, Lei
Yuan, Xiaojun
Li, Cuihua
author_facet Wang, Lei
Yuan, Xiaojun
Li, Cuihua
author_sort Wang, Lei
title Subseasonal forecast of Arctic sea ice concentration via statistical approaches
title_short Subseasonal forecast of Arctic sea ice concentration via statistical approaches
title_full Subseasonal forecast of Arctic sea ice concentration via statistical approaches
title_fullStr Subseasonal forecast of Arctic sea ice concentration via statistical approaches
title_full_unstemmed Subseasonal forecast of Arctic sea ice concentration via statistical approaches
title_sort subseasonal forecast of arctic sea ice concentration via statistical approaches
publishDate 2019
url https://doi.org/10.7916/cf3g-tt37
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Global warming
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Global warming
Sea ice
op_relation https://doi.org/10.7916/cf3g-tt37
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7916/cf3g-tt37
_version_ 1766315488834486272