California Winter Precipitation Predictability: Insights From the Anomalous 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 Seasons

The unexpected dry 2015–2016 El Niño winter and extremely wet 2016–2017 La Niña winter in California challenged current seasonal prediction systems. Using the Met Office GloSea5 forecast ensemble, we study the precipitation and circulation differences between these seasons and identify processes rel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Singh, Deepti, Ting, Mingfang, Scaife, Adam A., Martin, Nicola
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7916/D8K08N7B
id ftcolumbiauniv:oai:academiccommons.columbia.edu:10.7916/D8K08N7B
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcolumbiauniv:oai:academiccommons.columbia.edu:10.7916/D8K08N7B 2023-05-15T14:50:54+02:00 California Winter Precipitation Predictability: Insights From the Anomalous 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 Seasons Singh, Deepti Ting, Mingfang Scaife, Adam A. Martin, Nicola 2018 https://doi.org/10.7916/D8K08N7B English eng https://doi.org/10.7916/D8K08N7B Climatic changes Precipitation variability Precipitation forecasting Climatic changes--Models Arctic oscillation Articles 2018 ftcolumbiauniv https://doi.org/10.7916/D8K08N7B 2019-04-04T08:17:57Z The unexpected dry 2015–2016 El Niño winter and extremely wet 2016–2017 La Niña winter in California challenged current seasonal prediction systems. Using the Met Office GloSea5 forecast ensemble, we study the precipitation and circulation differences between these seasons and identify processes relevant to California precipitation predictions. The ensemble mean accurately predicts the midlatitude atmospheric circulation differences between these years, indicating that these differences were predictable responses to the strong oceanic forcing differences. The substantial California precipitation differences were poorly predicted with large uncertainty. Notable differences in high-latitude circulation anomalies associated with internal variability distinguish the ensemble members that successfully simulate precipitation from those that do not. Specifically, accurate representation of the Arctic Oscillation phase differences improves the accuracy of simulated precipitation differences but these differences were not well predicted in the ensemble mean for these seasons. Improved representation of high-latitude processes such as the Arctic Oscillation and polar-midlatitude teleconnections could therefore improve California seasonal predictions. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Columbia University: Academic Commons Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Columbia University: Academic Commons
op_collection_id ftcolumbiauniv
language English
topic Climatic changes
Precipitation variability
Precipitation forecasting
Climatic changes--Models
Arctic oscillation
spellingShingle Climatic changes
Precipitation variability
Precipitation forecasting
Climatic changes--Models
Arctic oscillation
Singh, Deepti
Ting, Mingfang
Scaife, Adam A.
Martin, Nicola
California Winter Precipitation Predictability: Insights From the Anomalous 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 Seasons
topic_facet Climatic changes
Precipitation variability
Precipitation forecasting
Climatic changes--Models
Arctic oscillation
description The unexpected dry 2015–2016 El Niño winter and extremely wet 2016–2017 La Niña winter in California challenged current seasonal prediction systems. Using the Met Office GloSea5 forecast ensemble, we study the precipitation and circulation differences between these seasons and identify processes relevant to California precipitation predictions. The ensemble mean accurately predicts the midlatitude atmospheric circulation differences between these years, indicating that these differences were predictable responses to the strong oceanic forcing differences. The substantial California precipitation differences were poorly predicted with large uncertainty. Notable differences in high-latitude circulation anomalies associated with internal variability distinguish the ensemble members that successfully simulate precipitation from those that do not. Specifically, accurate representation of the Arctic Oscillation phase differences improves the accuracy of simulated precipitation differences but these differences were not well predicted in the ensemble mean for these seasons. Improved representation of high-latitude processes such as the Arctic Oscillation and polar-midlatitude teleconnections could therefore improve California seasonal predictions.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Singh, Deepti
Ting, Mingfang
Scaife, Adam A.
Martin, Nicola
author_facet Singh, Deepti
Ting, Mingfang
Scaife, Adam A.
Martin, Nicola
author_sort Singh, Deepti
title California Winter Precipitation Predictability: Insights From the Anomalous 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 Seasons
title_short California Winter Precipitation Predictability: Insights From the Anomalous 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 Seasons
title_full California Winter Precipitation Predictability: Insights From the Anomalous 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 Seasons
title_fullStr California Winter Precipitation Predictability: Insights From the Anomalous 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 Seasons
title_full_unstemmed California Winter Precipitation Predictability: Insights From the Anomalous 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 Seasons
title_sort california winter precipitation predictability: insights from the anomalous 2015–2016 and 2016–2017 seasons
publishDate 2018
url https://doi.org/10.7916/D8K08N7B
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation https://doi.org/10.7916/D8K08N7B
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7916/D8K08N7B
_version_ 1766321955262169088