Stratosphere–Troposphere Coupling in a Relatively Simple AGCM: The Importance of Stratospheric Variability

The impact of stratospheric variability on the dynamical coupling between the stratosphere and the troposphere is explored in a relatively simple atmospheric general circulation model. Variability of the model’s stratospheric polar vortex, or polar night jet, is induced by topographically forced sta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerber, Edwin P., Polvani, Lorenzo M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.7916/D8D79NK2
id ftcolumbiauniv:oai:academiccommons.columbia.edu:10.7916/D8D79NK2
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcolumbiauniv:oai:academiccommons.columbia.edu:10.7916/D8D79NK2 2023-05-15T18:02:16+02:00 Stratosphere–Troposphere Coupling in a Relatively Simple AGCM: The Importance of Stratospheric Variability Gerber, Edwin P. Polvani, Lorenzo M. 2009 https://doi.org/10.7916/D8D79NK2 English eng https://doi.org/10.7916/D8D79NK2 Atmosphere Meteorology Upper Articles 2009 ftcolumbiauniv https://doi.org/10.7916/D8D79NK2 2019-04-04T08:10:15Z The impact of stratospheric variability on the dynamical coupling between the stratosphere and the troposphere is explored in a relatively simple atmospheric general circulation model. Variability of the model’s stratospheric polar vortex, or polar night jet, is induced by topographically forced stationary waves. A robust relationship is found between the strength of the stratospheric polar vortex and the latitude of the tropospheric jet, confirming and extending earlier results in the absence of stationary waves. In both the climatological mean and on intraseasonal time scales, a weaker vortex is associated with an equatorward shift in the tropospheric jet and vice versa. It is found that the mean structure and variability of the vortex in the model is very sensitive to the amplitude of the topography and that Northern Hemisphere–like variability, with a realistic frequency of stratospheric sudden warming events, occurs only for a relatively narrow range of topographic heights. When the model captures sudden warming events with fidelity, however, the exchange of information both upward and downward between the troposphere and stratosphere closely resembles that in observations. The influence of stratospheric variability on variability in the troposphere is demonstrated by comparing integrations with and without an active stratosphere. A realistic, time-dependent stratospheric circulation increases the persistence of the tropospheric annular modes, and the dynamical coupling is most apparent prior to and following stratospheric sudden warming events. Article in Journal/Newspaper polar night Columbia University: Academic Commons
institution Open Polar
collection Columbia University: Academic Commons
op_collection_id ftcolumbiauniv
language English
topic Atmosphere
Meteorology
Upper
spellingShingle Atmosphere
Meteorology
Upper
Gerber, Edwin P.
Polvani, Lorenzo M.
Stratosphere–Troposphere Coupling in a Relatively Simple AGCM: The Importance of Stratospheric Variability
topic_facet Atmosphere
Meteorology
Upper
description The impact of stratospheric variability on the dynamical coupling between the stratosphere and the troposphere is explored in a relatively simple atmospheric general circulation model. Variability of the model’s stratospheric polar vortex, or polar night jet, is induced by topographically forced stationary waves. A robust relationship is found between the strength of the stratospheric polar vortex and the latitude of the tropospheric jet, confirming and extending earlier results in the absence of stationary waves. In both the climatological mean and on intraseasonal time scales, a weaker vortex is associated with an equatorward shift in the tropospheric jet and vice versa. It is found that the mean structure and variability of the vortex in the model is very sensitive to the amplitude of the topography and that Northern Hemisphere–like variability, with a realistic frequency of stratospheric sudden warming events, occurs only for a relatively narrow range of topographic heights. When the model captures sudden warming events with fidelity, however, the exchange of information both upward and downward between the troposphere and stratosphere closely resembles that in observations. The influence of stratospheric variability on variability in the troposphere is demonstrated by comparing integrations with and without an active stratosphere. A realistic, time-dependent stratospheric circulation increases the persistence of the tropospheric annular modes, and the dynamical coupling is most apparent prior to and following stratospheric sudden warming events.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Gerber, Edwin P.
Polvani, Lorenzo M.
author_facet Gerber, Edwin P.
Polvani, Lorenzo M.
author_sort Gerber, Edwin P.
title Stratosphere–Troposphere Coupling in a Relatively Simple AGCM: The Importance of Stratospheric Variability
title_short Stratosphere–Troposphere Coupling in a Relatively Simple AGCM: The Importance of Stratospheric Variability
title_full Stratosphere–Troposphere Coupling in a Relatively Simple AGCM: The Importance of Stratospheric Variability
title_fullStr Stratosphere–Troposphere Coupling in a Relatively Simple AGCM: The Importance of Stratospheric Variability
title_full_unstemmed Stratosphere–Troposphere Coupling in a Relatively Simple AGCM: The Importance of Stratospheric Variability
title_sort stratosphere–troposphere coupling in a relatively simple agcm: the importance of stratospheric variability
publishDate 2009
url https://doi.org/10.7916/D8D79NK2
genre polar night
genre_facet polar night
op_relation https://doi.org/10.7916/D8D79NK2
op_doi https://doi.org/10.7916/D8D79NK2
_version_ 1766172066200944640