How did the hydrologic cycle respond to the two-phase mystery interval?
Lake Estancia’s transition from a Big Dry episode during the first half of the Mystery Interval to a Big Wet episode during the second half has equivalents in records from across the planet. At the time of this transition, Chinese monsoons experienced pronounced weakening, closed-basin lakes in both...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.7916/D81V5QN2 |
id |
ftcolumbiauniv:oai:academiccommons.columbia.edu:10.7916/D81V5QN2 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftcolumbiauniv:oai:academiccommons.columbia.edu:10.7916/D81V5QN2 2023-05-15T13:50:01+02:00 How did the hydrologic cycle respond to the two-phase mystery interval? Broecker, Wallace S. Putnam, Aaron Ervin 2012 https://doi.org/10.7916/D81V5QN2 English eng https://doi.org/10.7916/D81V5QN2 Hydrologic cycle Geochemistry Articles 2012 ftcolumbiauniv https://doi.org/10.7916/D81V5QN2 2019-04-04T08:08:38Z Lake Estancia’s transition from a Big Dry episode during the first half of the Mystery Interval to a Big Wet episode during the second half has equivalents in records from across the planet. At the time of this transition, Chinese monsoons experienced pronounced weakening, closed-basin lakes in both the Great Basin of the western United States and in the southern Altiplano of South America underwent a major expansion, mountain glaciers in Southern Hemisphere middle latitudes had retreated, and the rates of increase of CO2 and of d18O in Antarctic ice underwent a decrease. Finally, the precipitous drop in dust rain over Antarctica and the Southern Ocean terminated as did a similar drop in the 13C to 12C ratio in atmospheric CO2. These changes are consistent with a southward shift of the thermal equator. The cause of such a shift is thought to be an expansion of sea ice caused by a shutdown in deep water production in the northern Atlantic. This creates a dilemma because a similar southward shift is an expected consequence of the Heinrich event #1 which initiated the Mystery Interval. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Sea ice Southern Ocean Columbia University: Academic Commons Antarctic Southern Ocean |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Columbia University: Academic Commons |
op_collection_id |
ftcolumbiauniv |
language |
English |
topic |
Hydrologic cycle Geochemistry |
spellingShingle |
Hydrologic cycle Geochemistry Broecker, Wallace S. Putnam, Aaron Ervin How did the hydrologic cycle respond to the two-phase mystery interval? |
topic_facet |
Hydrologic cycle Geochemistry |
description |
Lake Estancia’s transition from a Big Dry episode during the first half of the Mystery Interval to a Big Wet episode during the second half has equivalents in records from across the planet. At the time of this transition, Chinese monsoons experienced pronounced weakening, closed-basin lakes in both the Great Basin of the western United States and in the southern Altiplano of South America underwent a major expansion, mountain glaciers in Southern Hemisphere middle latitudes had retreated, and the rates of increase of CO2 and of d18O in Antarctic ice underwent a decrease. Finally, the precipitous drop in dust rain over Antarctica and the Southern Ocean terminated as did a similar drop in the 13C to 12C ratio in atmospheric CO2. These changes are consistent with a southward shift of the thermal equator. The cause of such a shift is thought to be an expansion of sea ice caused by a shutdown in deep water production in the northern Atlantic. This creates a dilemma because a similar southward shift is an expected consequence of the Heinrich event #1 which initiated the Mystery Interval. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Broecker, Wallace S. Putnam, Aaron Ervin |
author_facet |
Broecker, Wallace S. Putnam, Aaron Ervin |
author_sort |
Broecker, Wallace S. |
title |
How did the hydrologic cycle respond to the two-phase mystery interval? |
title_short |
How did the hydrologic cycle respond to the two-phase mystery interval? |
title_full |
How did the hydrologic cycle respond to the two-phase mystery interval? |
title_fullStr |
How did the hydrologic cycle respond to the two-phase mystery interval? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How did the hydrologic cycle respond to the two-phase mystery interval? |
title_sort |
how did the hydrologic cycle respond to the two-phase mystery interval? |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.7916/D81V5QN2 |
geographic |
Antarctic Southern Ocean |
geographic_facet |
Antarctic Southern Ocean |
genre |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Sea ice Southern Ocean |
genre_facet |
Antarc* Antarctic Antarctica Sea ice Southern Ocean |
op_relation |
https://doi.org/10.7916/D81V5QN2 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.7916/D81V5QN2 |
_version_ |
1766252752444325888 |