Porous Kirkenes: Crumbling Mining Town or Dynamic Port Cityscape?
The great number of actors in port city regions, such as port authorities, municipalities, national governments, private companies, societal groups, and flora and fauna, need to develop shared visions. Collaborative approaches that focus on combined values can help achieve long-term resilience and e...
Published in: | Urban Planning |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio Press
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4105 https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i3.4105 |
_version_ | 1821841451277877248 |
---|---|
author | Höller, Lukas |
author_facet | Höller, Lukas |
author_sort | Höller, Lukas |
collection | Cogitatio Press |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 197 |
container_title | Urban Planning |
container_volume | 6 |
description | The great number of actors in port city regions, such as port authorities, municipalities, national governments, private companies, societal groups, and flora and fauna, need to develop shared visions. Collaborative approaches that focus on combined values can help achieve long-term resilience and enable a sustainable and just coexistence of port and city actors within the same territory. However, the sheer focus on economic profit generated by port activities overshadows and ignores equally essential cultural, societal, and environmental values and needs. The lack of pluralities in planning and decision-making processes creates challenges for the cohabitation of the many actors and their interests within port-city regions. On the one hand, contemporary spaces in port cities cannot be classified and defined by traditional dichotomies anymore. On the other hand, the perception of spatial and institutional boundaries between port and city leads to a positivistic-driven definition of a rigid and inflexible, line-like interface physically and mentally separating the port from the urban activities and stakeholders, neglecting the inseparable character of many parts of our society. By investigating and re-imagining the future port-development plans within the historic mining town of Kirkenes, located around 400 km above the Arctic Circle in Northern Norway, the aim of this article is to explore and combine the concepts of negative and positive porosity and liminality and arrive at a renewed perception of the port cityscape, which can function as dynamic thresholds inbetween the multiple dualities and realities of various port and city actors. The article bridges the theoretical/conceptual sphere of urban porosity and the practical approaches of liminal design. By using Design Fiction as a tool for creating new, innovative, and pluralistic port city narratives, the article contributes to contemporary research that aims for imaginary, value-based, and history-informed approaches to designing future-proof, resilient, ... |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Arctic Kirkenes Northern Norway |
genre_facet | Arctic Kirkenes Northern Norway |
geographic | Arctic Norway |
geographic_facet | Arctic Norway |
id | ftcogitatiopress:oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4105 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftcogitatiopress |
op_container_end_page | 209 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i3.410510.17645/up.i222 |
op_relation | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4105/2206 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4105 doi:10.17645/up.v6i3.4105 |
op_rights | Copyright (c) 2021 Lukas Höller http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
op_source | Urban Planning; Vol 6, No 3 (2021): Planning for Porosity: Exploring Port City Development through the Lens of Boundaries and Flows; 197-209 2183-7635 10.17645/up.i222 |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cogitatio Press |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftcogitatiopress:oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/4105 2025-01-16T20:46:32+00:00 Porous Kirkenes: Crumbling Mining Town or Dynamic Port Cityscape? Höller, Lukas 2021-07-27 application/pdf https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4105 https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i3.4105 eng eng Cogitatio Press https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4105/2206 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4105 doi:10.17645/up.v6i3.4105 Copyright (c) 2021 Lukas Höller http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Urban Planning; Vol 6, No 3 (2021): Planning for Porosity: Exploring Port City Development through the Lens of Boundaries and Flows; 197-209 2183-7635 10.17645/up.i222 borders boundaries Kirkenes liminality porosity port cityscape synergistic and adaptive ecosystems info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2021 ftcogitatiopress https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i3.410510.17645/up.i222 2024-08-22T03:17:32Z The great number of actors in port city regions, such as port authorities, municipalities, national governments, private companies, societal groups, and flora and fauna, need to develop shared visions. Collaborative approaches that focus on combined values can help achieve long-term resilience and enable a sustainable and just coexistence of port and city actors within the same territory. However, the sheer focus on economic profit generated by port activities overshadows and ignores equally essential cultural, societal, and environmental values and needs. The lack of pluralities in planning and decision-making processes creates challenges for the cohabitation of the many actors and their interests within port-city regions. On the one hand, contemporary spaces in port cities cannot be classified and defined by traditional dichotomies anymore. On the other hand, the perception of spatial and institutional boundaries between port and city leads to a positivistic-driven definition of a rigid and inflexible, line-like interface physically and mentally separating the port from the urban activities and stakeholders, neglecting the inseparable character of many parts of our society. By investigating and re-imagining the future port-development plans within the historic mining town of Kirkenes, located around 400 km above the Arctic Circle in Northern Norway, the aim of this article is to explore and combine the concepts of negative and positive porosity and liminality and arrive at a renewed perception of the port cityscape, which can function as dynamic thresholds inbetween the multiple dualities and realities of various port and city actors. The article bridges the theoretical/conceptual sphere of urban porosity and the practical approaches of liminal design. By using Design Fiction as a tool for creating new, innovative, and pluralistic port city narratives, the article contributes to contemporary research that aims for imaginary, value-based, and history-informed approaches to designing future-proof, resilient, ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Kirkenes Northern Norway Cogitatio Press Arctic Norway Urban Planning 6 3 197 209 |
spellingShingle | borders boundaries Kirkenes liminality porosity port cityscape synergistic and adaptive ecosystems Höller, Lukas Porous Kirkenes: Crumbling Mining Town or Dynamic Port Cityscape? |
title | Porous Kirkenes: Crumbling Mining Town or Dynamic Port Cityscape? |
title_full | Porous Kirkenes: Crumbling Mining Town or Dynamic Port Cityscape? |
title_fullStr | Porous Kirkenes: Crumbling Mining Town or Dynamic Port Cityscape? |
title_full_unstemmed | Porous Kirkenes: Crumbling Mining Town or Dynamic Port Cityscape? |
title_short | Porous Kirkenes: Crumbling Mining Town or Dynamic Port Cityscape? |
title_sort | porous kirkenes: crumbling mining town or dynamic port cityscape? |
topic | borders boundaries Kirkenes liminality porosity port cityscape synergistic and adaptive ecosystems |
topic_facet | borders boundaries Kirkenes liminality porosity port cityscape synergistic and adaptive ecosystems |
url | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4105 https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v6i3.4105 |