Party Positions on Differentiated European Integration in the Nordic Countries: Growing Together, Growing Apart?

The Nordic countries constitute an interesting laboratory for the study of differentiated European Integration. Even though Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden share some historical, cultural, socio-economic and political characteristics, all those countries have ultimately opted for a dif...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Politics and Governance
Main Authors: Leruth, Benjamin, Trondal, Jarle, Gänzle, Stefan
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3353
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3353
id ftcogitatiopress:oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3353
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcogitatiopress:oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/3353 2023-06-11T04:13:07+02:00 Party Positions on Differentiated European Integration in the Nordic Countries: Growing Together, Growing Apart? Leruth, Benjamin Trondal, Jarle Gänzle, Stefan 2020-11-03 application/pdf https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3353 https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3353 eng eng Cogitatio https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3353/3353 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3353 doi:10.17645/pag.v8i4.3353 Copyright (c) 2020 Benjamin Leruth, Jarle Trondal, Stefan Gänzle http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): Rediscovering Nordic Cooperation; 89-99 2183-2463 democratic values differentiation European Union Nordic cooperation party politics info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2020 ftcogitatiopress https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3353 2023-04-23T16:33:12Z The Nordic countries constitute an interesting laboratory for the study of differentiated European Integration. Even though Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden share some historical, cultural, socio-economic and political characteristics, all those countries have ultimately opted for a different kind of relationship with the EU. Whereas Finland, a member of the Eurozone since its inception in 1999, has been considered to be part of the Union’s ‘inner core’ for quite some time, Iceland and Norway, in contrast, have opted to remain outside the EU albeit closely associated via the European Economic Area Agreement. The variation of relationships has also been reflected in Nordic parties’ positioning vis-à-vis European integration in general and differentiation of European integration in particular. Broadly speaking, party families can be distinguished along traditional (e.g., agrarian, Christian democratic, conservative, and social democratic) and modern (e.g., socialist left, green, and populist radical right) ideological orientations. Although political parties belonging to both the traditional and modern Nordic party families have adopted different stances on European differentiated integration, we would assume—against the backdrop of Nordic cooperation—higher levels of transnational cooperation in European matters. Consequently, this article examines the similarities and differences between parties belonging to the same ideological family, and the extent of transnational party cooperation in the Nordic countries. Drawing on a series of interviews conducted with party representatives as well as on official party documents, this article shows that although institutionalized party cooperation mostly reflects divisions between party families, such institutionalization does not include a common vision for European integration. We conclude that the low level of partisan Nordic integration is primarily caused by domestic-level factors, such as intra-party divisions, government participation and public opinion. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Cogitatio Press (E-Journals) Norway Politics and Governance 8 4 89 99
institution Open Polar
collection Cogitatio Press (E-Journals)
op_collection_id ftcogitatiopress
language English
topic democratic values
differentiation
European Union
Nordic cooperation
party politics
spellingShingle democratic values
differentiation
European Union
Nordic cooperation
party politics
Leruth, Benjamin
Trondal, Jarle
Gänzle, Stefan
Party Positions on Differentiated European Integration in the Nordic Countries: Growing Together, Growing Apart?
topic_facet democratic values
differentiation
European Union
Nordic cooperation
party politics
description The Nordic countries constitute an interesting laboratory for the study of differentiated European Integration. Even though Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden share some historical, cultural, socio-economic and political characteristics, all those countries have ultimately opted for a different kind of relationship with the EU. Whereas Finland, a member of the Eurozone since its inception in 1999, has been considered to be part of the Union’s ‘inner core’ for quite some time, Iceland and Norway, in contrast, have opted to remain outside the EU albeit closely associated via the European Economic Area Agreement. The variation of relationships has also been reflected in Nordic parties’ positioning vis-à-vis European integration in general and differentiation of European integration in particular. Broadly speaking, party families can be distinguished along traditional (e.g., agrarian, Christian democratic, conservative, and social democratic) and modern (e.g., socialist left, green, and populist radical right) ideological orientations. Although political parties belonging to both the traditional and modern Nordic party families have adopted different stances on European differentiated integration, we would assume—against the backdrop of Nordic cooperation—higher levels of transnational cooperation in European matters. Consequently, this article examines the similarities and differences between parties belonging to the same ideological family, and the extent of transnational party cooperation in the Nordic countries. Drawing on a series of interviews conducted with party representatives as well as on official party documents, this article shows that although institutionalized party cooperation mostly reflects divisions between party families, such institutionalization does not include a common vision for European integration. We conclude that the low level of partisan Nordic integration is primarily caused by domestic-level factors, such as intra-party divisions, government participation and public opinion.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Leruth, Benjamin
Trondal, Jarle
Gänzle, Stefan
author_facet Leruth, Benjamin
Trondal, Jarle
Gänzle, Stefan
author_sort Leruth, Benjamin
title Party Positions on Differentiated European Integration in the Nordic Countries: Growing Together, Growing Apart?
title_short Party Positions on Differentiated European Integration in the Nordic Countries: Growing Together, Growing Apart?
title_full Party Positions on Differentiated European Integration in the Nordic Countries: Growing Together, Growing Apart?
title_fullStr Party Positions on Differentiated European Integration in the Nordic Countries: Growing Together, Growing Apart?
title_full_unstemmed Party Positions on Differentiated European Integration in the Nordic Countries: Growing Together, Growing Apart?
title_sort party positions on differentiated european integration in the nordic countries: growing together, growing apart?
publisher Cogitatio
publishDate 2020
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3353
https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3353
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source Politics and Governance; Vol 8, No 4 (2020): Rediscovering Nordic Cooperation; 89-99
2183-2463
op_relation https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3353/3353
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3353
doi:10.17645/pag.v8i4.3353
op_rights Copyright (c) 2020 Benjamin Leruth, Jarle Trondal, Stefan Gänzle
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i4.3353
container_title Politics and Governance
container_volume 8
container_issue 4
container_start_page 89
op_container_end_page 99
_version_ 1768389750077521920