When Truth Commission Models Travel: Explaining the Norwegian Case

This article explores ‘late justice’ in the context of settler democracies with a history of racism, using Norway as a case study. It examines the background for the Norwegian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), established by the Norwegian Parliament in 2018 to investigate the consequences o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Transitional Justice
Main Authors: Skaar, Elin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3050845
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijac027
_version_ 1821698424786911232
author Skaar
Elin
author_facet Skaar
Elin
author_sort Skaar
collection CMI Open Research Archive (Chr. Michelsens Institutt)
container_title International Journal of Transitional Justice
description This article explores ‘late justice’ in the context of settler democracies with a history of racism, using Norway as a case study. It examines the background for the Norwegian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), established by the Norwegian Parliament in 2018 to investigate the consequences of historical and ongoing assimilation of the indigenous Sami people and two national minorities. I argue that although the Norwegian TRC was established in direct response to an initiative from the Sami Parliament, its successful creation was a result of political negotiations involving a series of actors, including Sami activists, mainstream politicians and various interest organizations. The protagonists pushing for a truth commission were in turn encouraged and inspired by a global focus on transitional justice, truth commissions and indigenous rights. Based on a desk study, interviews and media reports, and applying a theoretical framework emphasizing agency and norm diffusion, I argue that while the Norwegian TRC has explicitly used truth commissions elsewhere in the world – particularly the Canadian TRC – as models, it is quite unique in terms of mandate and design.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
genre sami
genre_facet sami
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
id ftcmi:oai:open.cmi.no:11250/3050845
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftcmi
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijac027
op_relation International Journal of Transitional Justice
2 February 2023
International Journal of Transitional Justice vol. 00 no. 2 February 2023
https://www.cmi.no/publications/8696-when-truth-commission-models-travel-explaining-the-norwegian-case
oai:www.cmi.no:8696
in International Journal of Transitional Justice vol. 00 no. 2 February 2023 pp. 1-18
https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3050845
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijac027
publishDate 2023
record_format openpolar
spelling ftcmi:oai:open.cmi.no:11250/3050845 2025-01-17T00:35:11+00:00 When Truth Commission Models Travel: Explaining the Norwegian Case Skaar Elin 2023-01-01 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3050845 https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijac027 eng eng International Journal of Transitional Justice 2 February 2023 International Journal of Transitional Justice vol. 00 no. 2 February 2023 https://www.cmi.no/publications/8696-when-truth-commission-models-travel-explaining-the-norwegian-case oai:www.cmi.no:8696 in International Journal of Transitional Justice vol. 00 no. 2 February 2023 pp. 1-18 https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3050845 https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijac027 Truth Commission Reconciliation Sami Kven Assimilation Norway Journal article Peer reviewed 2023 ftcmi https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijac027 2023-02-15T23:41:49Z This article explores ‘late justice’ in the context of settler democracies with a history of racism, using Norway as a case study. It examines the background for the Norwegian Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), established by the Norwegian Parliament in 2018 to investigate the consequences of historical and ongoing assimilation of the indigenous Sami people and two national minorities. I argue that although the Norwegian TRC was established in direct response to an initiative from the Sami Parliament, its successful creation was a result of political negotiations involving a series of actors, including Sami activists, mainstream politicians and various interest organizations. The protagonists pushing for a truth commission were in turn encouraged and inspired by a global focus on transitional justice, truth commissions and indigenous rights. Based on a desk study, interviews and media reports, and applying a theoretical framework emphasizing agency and norm diffusion, I argue that while the Norwegian TRC has explicitly used truth commissions elsewhere in the world – particularly the Canadian TRC – as models, it is quite unique in terms of mandate and design. Article in Journal/Newspaper sami CMI Open Research Archive (Chr. Michelsens Institutt) Norway International Journal of Transitional Justice
spellingShingle Truth Commission
Reconciliation
Sami
Kven
Assimilation
Norway
Skaar
Elin
When Truth Commission Models Travel: Explaining the Norwegian Case
title When Truth Commission Models Travel: Explaining the Norwegian Case
title_full When Truth Commission Models Travel: Explaining the Norwegian Case
title_fullStr When Truth Commission Models Travel: Explaining the Norwegian Case
title_full_unstemmed When Truth Commission Models Travel: Explaining the Norwegian Case
title_short When Truth Commission Models Travel: Explaining the Norwegian Case
title_sort when truth commission models travel: explaining the norwegian case
topic Truth Commission
Reconciliation
Sami
Kven
Assimilation
Norway
topic_facet Truth Commission
Reconciliation
Sami
Kven
Assimilation
Norway
url https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3050845
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijac027