Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf

International audience Abstract. The oil and gas (O&G) sector is a significant source of methane (CH4) emissions. Quantifying these emissions remains challenging, with many studies highlighting discrepancies between measurements and inventory-based estimates. In this study, we present CH4 emissi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Foulds, Amy, Allen, Grant, Shaw, Jacob, Bateson, Prudence, Barker, Patrick, Huang, Langwen, Pitt, Joseph, Lee, James, Wilde, Shona, Dominutti, Pamela, Purvis, Ruth, Lowry, David, France, James, Fisher, Rebecca, Fiehn, Alina, Pühl, Magdalena, Bauguitte, Stéphane, Conley, Stephen, Smith, Mackenzie, Lachlan-Cope, Tom, Pisso, Ignacio, Schwietzke, Stefan
Other Authors: Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique (LaMP), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA), Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories (WACL), University of York York, UK
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473
https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473/document
https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473/file/acp-22-4303-2022.pdf
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022
id ftclermontuniv:oai:HAL:hal-03641473v1
record_format openpolar
spelling ftclermontuniv:oai:HAL:hal-03641473v1 2023-06-11T04:15:27+02:00 Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf Foulds, Amy Allen, Grant Shaw, Jacob Bateson, Prudence Barker, Patrick Huang, Langwen Pitt, Joseph Lee, James Wilde, Shona Dominutti, Pamela Purvis, Ruth Lowry, David France, James Fisher, Rebecca Fiehn, Alina Pühl, Magdalena Bauguitte, Stéphane Conley, Stephen Smith, Mackenzie Lachlan-Cope, Tom Pisso, Ignacio Schwietzke, Stefan Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique (LaMP) Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA) Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories (WACL) University of York York, UK 2022 https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473 https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473/document https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473/file/acp-22-4303-2022.pdf https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022 en eng HAL CCSD European Geosciences Union info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022 hal-03641473 https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473 https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473/document https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473/file/acp-22-4303-2022.pdf doi:10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess ISSN: 1680-7316 EISSN: 1680-7324 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473 Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2022, 22 (7), pp.4303-4322. ⟨10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022⟩ [SDE.IE]Environmental Sciences/Environmental Engineering [SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes [SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society [CHIM.ANAL]Chemical Sciences/Analytical chemistry info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal articles 2022 ftclermontuniv https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022 2023-05-02T22:43:20Z International audience Abstract. The oil and gas (O&G) sector is a significant source of methane (CH4) emissions. Quantifying these emissions remains challenging, with many studies highlighting discrepancies between measurements and inventory-based estimates. In this study, we present CH4 emission fluxes from 21 offshore O&G facilities collected in 10 O&G fields over two regions of the Norwegian continental shelf in 2019. Emissions of CH4 derived from measurements during 13 aircraft surveys were found to range from 2.6 to 1200 t yr−1 (with a mean of 211 t yr−1 across all 21 facilities). Comparing this with aggregated operator-reported facility emissions for 2019, we found excellent agreement (within 1σ uncertainty), with mean aircraft-measured fluxes only 16 % lower than those reported by operators. We also compared aircraft-derived fluxes with facility fluxes extracted from a global gridded fossil fuel CH4 emission inventory compiled for 2016. We found that the measured emissions were 42 % larger than the inventory for the area covered by this study, for the 21 facilities surveyed (in aggregate). We interpret this large discrepancy not to reflect a systematic error in the operator-reported emissions, which agree with measurements, but rather the representativity of the global inventory due to the methodology used to construct it and the fact that the inventory was compiled for 2016 (and thus not representative of emissions in 2019). This highlights the need for timely and up-to-date inventories for use in research and policy. The variable nature of CH4 emissions from individual facilities requires knowledge of facility operational status during measurements for data to be useful in prioritising targeted emission mitigation solutions. Future surveys of individual facilities would benefit from knowledge of facility operational status over time. Field-specific aggregated emissions (and uncertainty statistics), as presented here for the Norwegian Sea, can be meaningfully estimated from intensive ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Norwegian Sea HAL Clermont Auvergne (Université Blaise Pascal Clermont-Ferrand/Université d'Auvergne) Norwegian Sea Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 22 7 4303 4322
institution Open Polar
collection HAL Clermont Auvergne (Université Blaise Pascal Clermont-Ferrand/Université d'Auvergne)
op_collection_id ftclermontuniv
language English
topic [SDE.IE]Environmental Sciences/Environmental Engineering
[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes
[SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society
[CHIM.ANAL]Chemical Sciences/Analytical chemistry
spellingShingle [SDE.IE]Environmental Sciences/Environmental Engineering
[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes
[SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society
[CHIM.ANAL]Chemical Sciences/Analytical chemistry
Foulds, Amy
Allen, Grant
Shaw, Jacob
Bateson, Prudence
Barker, Patrick
Huang, Langwen
Pitt, Joseph
Lee, James
Wilde, Shona
Dominutti, Pamela
Purvis, Ruth
Lowry, David
France, James
Fisher, Rebecca
Fiehn, Alina
Pühl, Magdalena
Bauguitte, Stéphane
Conley, Stephen
Smith, Mackenzie
Lachlan-Cope, Tom
Pisso, Ignacio
Schwietzke, Stefan
Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf
topic_facet [SDE.IE]Environmental Sciences/Environmental Engineering
[SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes
[SDE.ES]Environmental Sciences/Environmental and Society
[CHIM.ANAL]Chemical Sciences/Analytical chemistry
description International audience Abstract. The oil and gas (O&G) sector is a significant source of methane (CH4) emissions. Quantifying these emissions remains challenging, with many studies highlighting discrepancies between measurements and inventory-based estimates. In this study, we present CH4 emission fluxes from 21 offshore O&G facilities collected in 10 O&G fields over two regions of the Norwegian continental shelf in 2019. Emissions of CH4 derived from measurements during 13 aircraft surveys were found to range from 2.6 to 1200 t yr−1 (with a mean of 211 t yr−1 across all 21 facilities). Comparing this with aggregated operator-reported facility emissions for 2019, we found excellent agreement (within 1σ uncertainty), with mean aircraft-measured fluxes only 16 % lower than those reported by operators. We also compared aircraft-derived fluxes with facility fluxes extracted from a global gridded fossil fuel CH4 emission inventory compiled for 2016. We found that the measured emissions were 42 % larger than the inventory for the area covered by this study, for the 21 facilities surveyed (in aggregate). We interpret this large discrepancy not to reflect a systematic error in the operator-reported emissions, which agree with measurements, but rather the representativity of the global inventory due to the methodology used to construct it and the fact that the inventory was compiled for 2016 (and thus not representative of emissions in 2019). This highlights the need for timely and up-to-date inventories for use in research and policy. The variable nature of CH4 emissions from individual facilities requires knowledge of facility operational status during measurements for data to be useful in prioritising targeted emission mitigation solutions. Future surveys of individual facilities would benefit from knowledge of facility operational status over time. Field-specific aggregated emissions (and uncertainty statistics), as presented here for the Norwegian Sea, can be meaningfully estimated from intensive ...
author2 Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique (LaMP)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA)
Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories (WACL)
University of York York, UK
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Foulds, Amy
Allen, Grant
Shaw, Jacob
Bateson, Prudence
Barker, Patrick
Huang, Langwen
Pitt, Joseph
Lee, James
Wilde, Shona
Dominutti, Pamela
Purvis, Ruth
Lowry, David
France, James
Fisher, Rebecca
Fiehn, Alina
Pühl, Magdalena
Bauguitte, Stéphane
Conley, Stephen
Smith, Mackenzie
Lachlan-Cope, Tom
Pisso, Ignacio
Schwietzke, Stefan
author_facet Foulds, Amy
Allen, Grant
Shaw, Jacob
Bateson, Prudence
Barker, Patrick
Huang, Langwen
Pitt, Joseph
Lee, James
Wilde, Shona
Dominutti, Pamela
Purvis, Ruth
Lowry, David
France, James
Fisher, Rebecca
Fiehn, Alina
Pühl, Magdalena
Bauguitte, Stéphane
Conley, Stephen
Smith, Mackenzie
Lachlan-Cope, Tom
Pisso, Ignacio
Schwietzke, Stefan
author_sort Foulds, Amy
title Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf
title_short Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf
title_full Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf
title_fullStr Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf
title_full_unstemmed Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf
title_sort quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the norwegian continental shelf
publisher HAL CCSD
publishDate 2022
url https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473
https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473/document
https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473/file/acp-22-4303-2022.pdf
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022
geographic Norwegian Sea
geographic_facet Norwegian Sea
genre Norwegian Sea
genre_facet Norwegian Sea
op_source ISSN: 1680-7316
EISSN: 1680-7324
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2022, 22 (7), pp.4303-4322. ⟨10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022⟩
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022
hal-03641473
https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473
https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473/document
https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473/file/acp-22-4303-2022.pdf
doi:10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022
op_rights http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/
info:eu-repo/semantics/OpenAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022
container_title Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
container_volume 22
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4303
op_container_end_page 4322
_version_ 1768372292011687936