Quantification and assessment of methane emissions from offshore oil and gas facilities on the Norwegian continental shelf

International audience Abstract. The oil and gas (O&G) sector is a significant source of methane (CH4) emissions. Quantifying these emissions remains challenging, with many studies highlighting discrepancies between measurements and inventory-based estimates. In this study, we present CH4 emissi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
Main Authors: Foulds, Amy, Allen, Grant, Shaw, Jacob, Bateson, Prudence, Barker, Patrick, Huang, Langwen, Pitt, Joseph, Lee, James, Wilde, Shona, Dominutti, Pamela, Purvis, Ruth, Lowry, David, France, James, Fisher, Rebecca, Fiehn, Alina, Pühl, Magdalena, Bauguitte, Stéphane, Conley, Stephen, Smith, Mackenzie, Lachlan-Cope, Tom, Pisso, Ignacio, Schwietzke, Stefan
Other Authors: Laboratoire de Météorologie Physique (LaMP), Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA), Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories (WACL), University of York York, UK
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: HAL CCSD 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473
https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473/document
https://hal.uca.fr/hal-03641473/file/acp-22-4303-2022.pdf
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4303-2022
Description
Summary:International audience Abstract. The oil and gas (O&G) sector is a significant source of methane (CH4) emissions. Quantifying these emissions remains challenging, with many studies highlighting discrepancies between measurements and inventory-based estimates. In this study, we present CH4 emission fluxes from 21 offshore O&G facilities collected in 10 O&G fields over two regions of the Norwegian continental shelf in 2019. Emissions of CH4 derived from measurements during 13 aircraft surveys were found to range from 2.6 to 1200 t yr−1 (with a mean of 211 t yr−1 across all 21 facilities). Comparing this with aggregated operator-reported facility emissions for 2019, we found excellent agreement (within 1σ uncertainty), with mean aircraft-measured fluxes only 16 % lower than those reported by operators. We also compared aircraft-derived fluxes with facility fluxes extracted from a global gridded fossil fuel CH4 emission inventory compiled for 2016. We found that the measured emissions were 42 % larger than the inventory for the area covered by this study, for the 21 facilities surveyed (in aggregate). We interpret this large discrepancy not to reflect a systematic error in the operator-reported emissions, which agree with measurements, but rather the representativity of the global inventory due to the methodology used to construct it and the fact that the inventory was compiled for 2016 (and thus not representative of emissions in 2019). This highlights the need for timely and up-to-date inventories for use in research and policy. The variable nature of CH4 emissions from individual facilities requires knowledge of facility operational status during measurements for data to be useful in prioritising targeted emission mitigation solutions. Future surveys of individual facilities would benefit from knowledge of facility operational status over time. Field-specific aggregated emissions (and uncertainty statistics), as presented here for the Norwegian Sea, can be meaningfully estimated from intensive ...