A “Medieval” Myth for a “Modern” Empire Britain under the Shadow of Arthur (1461–1612)
This dissertation studies the use of the Arthurian myth from the fifteenth through early seventeenth centuries, as a narrative that connected a set of political principles for the unification of Britain and its imperial expansion. Joining other competing political myths in the British archipelago, t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
CUNY Academic Works
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4643 https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5727&context=gc_etds |
id |
ftcityunivny:oai:academicworks.cuny.edu:gc_etds-5727 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftcityunivny:oai:academicworks.cuny.edu:gc_etds-5727 2023-05-15T17:36:23+02:00 A “Medieval” Myth for a “Modern” Empire Britain under the Shadow of Arthur (1461–1612) Gonzalez de Leon Heiblum, Julian 2022-02-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4643 https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5727&context=gc_etds English eng CUNY Academic Works https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4643 https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5727&context=gc_etds Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects British Isles British Empire Arthurian Myth Structuralism Colonialism Transatlantic Expansion Celtic Studies Comparative Methodologies and Theories Intellectual History Legal Medieval Studies Renaissance Studies Social and Cultural Anthropology dissertation 2022 ftcityunivny 2022-01-08T23:17:26Z This dissertation studies the use of the Arthurian myth from the fifteenth through early seventeenth centuries, as a narrative that connected a set of political principles for the unification of Britain and its imperial expansion. Joining other competing political myths in the British archipelago, the political significance of the Arthurian myth has nevertheless been overlooked. On the one hand, the myth informed the transformations of kingship in England and Wales from the crowning of Edward IV to the early years of James’ English reign. It did so specifically within the process of institutionalizing a British crown which was intertwined with the claim of imperium. On the other hand, the myth also reinforced the assertion of possession over other peoples’ lands, including the whole of Britain, Ireland, and even different spaces in the north Atlantic. The Arthurian myth intertwined these two claims—of imperium and of possession—through two different competing narratives which connected the Crown of England with the history of ancient Britain. Furthermore, Arthurian literature and historiography represented an internal liminality within the British archipelago which Britain then projected to the North American shores. Transatlantic colonization not only was legitimized by supposed ancient conquests, including Arthur’s, but the American spaces and inhabitants, like the Irish before them, were codified in connection to an imagined British past, which began to be alienated from the present, or modern times. Working against traditional approaches to intellectual history of political thought and utilizing various perspectives that include literary analysis and neo-structuralism, this dissertation thus argues that the Arthurian myth was an important contributor to the emergence of an Anglocentric British imperial constitution by intertwining its legal, political, historical, philosophical, and poetical foundations. Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis North Atlantic City University of New York: CUNY Academic Works |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
City University of New York: CUNY Academic Works |
op_collection_id |
ftcityunivny |
language |
English |
topic |
British Isles British Empire Arthurian Myth Structuralism Colonialism Transatlantic Expansion Celtic Studies Comparative Methodologies and Theories Intellectual History Legal Medieval Studies Renaissance Studies Social and Cultural Anthropology |
spellingShingle |
British Isles British Empire Arthurian Myth Structuralism Colonialism Transatlantic Expansion Celtic Studies Comparative Methodologies and Theories Intellectual History Legal Medieval Studies Renaissance Studies Social and Cultural Anthropology Gonzalez de Leon Heiblum, Julian A “Medieval” Myth for a “Modern” Empire Britain under the Shadow of Arthur (1461–1612) |
topic_facet |
British Isles British Empire Arthurian Myth Structuralism Colonialism Transatlantic Expansion Celtic Studies Comparative Methodologies and Theories Intellectual History Legal Medieval Studies Renaissance Studies Social and Cultural Anthropology |
description |
This dissertation studies the use of the Arthurian myth from the fifteenth through early seventeenth centuries, as a narrative that connected a set of political principles for the unification of Britain and its imperial expansion. Joining other competing political myths in the British archipelago, the political significance of the Arthurian myth has nevertheless been overlooked. On the one hand, the myth informed the transformations of kingship in England and Wales from the crowning of Edward IV to the early years of James’ English reign. It did so specifically within the process of institutionalizing a British crown which was intertwined with the claim of imperium. On the other hand, the myth also reinforced the assertion of possession over other peoples’ lands, including the whole of Britain, Ireland, and even different spaces in the north Atlantic. The Arthurian myth intertwined these two claims—of imperium and of possession—through two different competing narratives which connected the Crown of England with the history of ancient Britain. Furthermore, Arthurian literature and historiography represented an internal liminality within the British archipelago which Britain then projected to the North American shores. Transatlantic colonization not only was legitimized by supposed ancient conquests, including Arthur’s, but the American spaces and inhabitants, like the Irish before them, were codified in connection to an imagined British past, which began to be alienated from the present, or modern times. Working against traditional approaches to intellectual history of political thought and utilizing various perspectives that include literary analysis and neo-structuralism, this dissertation thus argues that the Arthurian myth was an important contributor to the emergence of an Anglocentric British imperial constitution by intertwining its legal, political, historical, philosophical, and poetical foundations. |
format |
Doctoral or Postdoctoral Thesis |
author |
Gonzalez de Leon Heiblum, Julian |
author_facet |
Gonzalez de Leon Heiblum, Julian |
author_sort |
Gonzalez de Leon Heiblum, Julian |
title |
A “Medieval” Myth for a “Modern” Empire Britain under the Shadow of Arthur (1461–1612) |
title_short |
A “Medieval” Myth for a “Modern” Empire Britain under the Shadow of Arthur (1461–1612) |
title_full |
A “Medieval” Myth for a “Modern” Empire Britain under the Shadow of Arthur (1461–1612) |
title_fullStr |
A “Medieval” Myth for a “Modern” Empire Britain under the Shadow of Arthur (1461–1612) |
title_full_unstemmed |
A “Medieval” Myth for a “Modern” Empire Britain under the Shadow of Arthur (1461–1612) |
title_sort |
“medieval” myth for a “modern” empire britain under the shadow of arthur (1461–1612) |
publisher |
CUNY Academic Works |
publishDate |
2022 |
url |
https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4643 https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5727&context=gc_etds |
genre |
North Atlantic |
genre_facet |
North Atlantic |
op_source |
Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects |
op_relation |
https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/4643 https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5727&context=gc_etds |
_version_ |
1766135860241104896 |