ARCTIC PLANTS NOT YET FOUND IN BRITAIN By NIcHoLAs POLUNIN
In the rightly appreciative reviews that have so far been published of the welcome new Flora of the British Isles (Clapham, Tutin and Warburg, 1952), there does not appear to be any mention of the omission, even as addenda, of the two most important additions to the known British flora that have bee...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.669.4816 http://archive.bsbi.org.uk/Wats3p34.pdf |
id |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.669.4816 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.669.4816 2023-05-15T15:07:30+02:00 ARCTIC PLANTS NOT YET FOUND IN BRITAIN By NIcHoLAs POLUNIN Gray Herbarium The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.669.4816 http://archive.bsbi.org.uk/Wats3p34.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.669.4816 http://archive.bsbi.org.uk/Wats3p34.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://archive.bsbi.org.uk/Wats3p34.pdf text ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T17:15:24Z In the rightly appreciative reviews that have so far been published of the welcome new Flora of the British Isles (Clapham, Tutin and Warburg, 1952), there does not appear to be any mention of the omission, even as addenda, of the two most important additions to the known British flora that have been made in recent years. These were Koenigia islandica L., a genus new to Britain, and Diapensia lapponica L., a family new to Britain; both are now considered "undoubtedly native on remote hills in Scotland " (Lousley, 1952). Both discoveries stirred public interest far beyond the British scientific press; that of Koenigia was announced in 1950 from material collected in 1934 (Burtt, 1950) and that of Diapensia was made in 1951 (Blakelock, 1952). More detailed accounts of the Koenigia (Raven, 1952) and of the Diapensia (Roger, 1952) in Scotland have now been published, as have reports in The Times and elsewhere; the former plant has since been refound also in neighbouring localities (Raven, 1952) and the latter is abundantly confirmed (Roger, 1952). It has also been reported (Lousley, 1951; Ribbons, 1952) that Homogyne alpina (L.) Cass. has been confirmed as occurring in the British Isles, although the elder George Don's "reputed discovery " (cf. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh, 3, 112-3 Text Arctic Unknown Arctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
ftciteseerx |
language |
English |
description |
In the rightly appreciative reviews that have so far been published of the welcome new Flora of the British Isles (Clapham, Tutin and Warburg, 1952), there does not appear to be any mention of the omission, even as addenda, of the two most important additions to the known British flora that have been made in recent years. These were Koenigia islandica L., a genus new to Britain, and Diapensia lapponica L., a family new to Britain; both are now considered "undoubtedly native on remote hills in Scotland " (Lousley, 1952). Both discoveries stirred public interest far beyond the British scientific press; that of Koenigia was announced in 1950 from material collected in 1934 (Burtt, 1950) and that of Diapensia was made in 1951 (Blakelock, 1952). More detailed accounts of the Koenigia (Raven, 1952) and of the Diapensia (Roger, 1952) in Scotland have now been published, as have reports in The Times and elsewhere; the former plant has since been refound also in neighbouring localities (Raven, 1952) and the latter is abundantly confirmed (Roger, 1952). It has also been reported (Lousley, 1951; Ribbons, 1952) that Homogyne alpina (L.) Cass. has been confirmed as occurring in the British Isles, although the elder George Don's "reputed discovery " (cf. Notes Roy. Bot. Gard. Edinburgh, 3, 112-3 |
author2 |
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives |
format |
Text |
author |
Gray Herbarium |
spellingShingle |
Gray Herbarium ARCTIC PLANTS NOT YET FOUND IN BRITAIN By NIcHoLAs POLUNIN |
author_facet |
Gray Herbarium |
author_sort |
Gray Herbarium |
title |
ARCTIC PLANTS NOT YET FOUND IN BRITAIN By NIcHoLAs POLUNIN |
title_short |
ARCTIC PLANTS NOT YET FOUND IN BRITAIN By NIcHoLAs POLUNIN |
title_full |
ARCTIC PLANTS NOT YET FOUND IN BRITAIN By NIcHoLAs POLUNIN |
title_fullStr |
ARCTIC PLANTS NOT YET FOUND IN BRITAIN By NIcHoLAs POLUNIN |
title_full_unstemmed |
ARCTIC PLANTS NOT YET FOUND IN BRITAIN By NIcHoLAs POLUNIN |
title_sort |
arctic plants not yet found in britain by nicholas polunin |
url |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.669.4816 http://archive.bsbi.org.uk/Wats3p34.pdf |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_source |
http://archive.bsbi.org.uk/Wats3p34.pdf |
op_relation |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.669.4816 http://archive.bsbi.org.uk/Wats3p34.pdf |
op_rights |
Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. |
_version_ |
1766338991517335552 |