Sea-ice deformation rates from satellite measurements and in a model
ABSTRACT The deformation of sea ice is an important element of the Arctic climate system because of its influ-ence on the ice-thickness distribution and on the rates of ice production and melt. New data obtained from the Radarsat Geophysical Processor System (RGPS) using satellite synthetic aperture...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2003
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.645.3236 http://psc.apl.washington.edu/zhang/Pubs/Lindsay_etal2003.pdf |
| Summary: | ABSTRACT The deformation of sea ice is an important element of the Arctic climate system because of its influ-ence on the ice-thickness distribution and on the rates of ice production and melt. New data obtained from the Radarsat Geophysical Processor System (RGPS) using satellite synthetic aperture radar images of the ice offers an opportunity to compare observations of the ice deformation to estimates obtained from models. The RGPS tracks tens of thousands of points, spaced roughly at 10-km intervals, for an entire season in a Lagrangian fash-ion. The deformation is computed from cells formed by the tracked points, typically at 3-day intervals. We used a coupled ice/ocean model with ice-thickness and enthalpy distributions that covers the entire Arctic Ocean with a 40-km grid. Model-only and model-with-data-assimilation runs were analysed. The data assimilation runs were analysed in order to determine the validity of the comparison techniques and to find the comparisons under the best of circumstances, when many buoy measurements are available for assimilation. This step is necessary because the RGPS and model data differ in spatial and temporal sampling characteristics. The assimilated data included buoy motion and Special Sensor Microwave/Imager (SSM/I)-derived ice motion. The Pacific half of the Arctic Basin was analysed for a 10-month period in 1997 and 1998. Comparisons of ice velocity observations to the modelled velocities showed excellent agreement from the model-with-data-assimilation run but poorer agree-ment for the model-only run. At a scale of 320 km, the deformation from the data assimilation run was in modest |
|---|