Pacific Fishery Management Council
submission of proposed electronic monitoring experimental fishing permit (EFP) applications. We have the following comments for your consideration. 1. For all of the proposals, any provision involving retention of halibut by non-hook gear requires permission from the IPHC. Authority to define legal...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.642.1687 http://www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/F5b_SUP_IPHC_Rpt_Ltr_to_PFMC_JUNE2014BB.pdf |
id |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.642.1687 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.642.1687 2023-05-15T15:43:46+02:00 Pacific Fishery Management Council Ms. Dorothy M. Lowman The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2014 application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.642.1687 http://www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/F5b_SUP_IPHC_Rpt_Ltr_to_PFMC_JUNE2014BB.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.642.1687 http://www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/F5b_SUP_IPHC_Rpt_Ltr_to_PFMC_JUNE2014BB.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/F5b_SUP_IPHC_Rpt_Ltr_to_PFMC_JUNE2014BB.pdf text 2014 ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T16:00:41Z submission of proposed electronic monitoring experimental fishing permit (EFP) applications. We have the following comments for your consideration. 1. For all of the proposals, any provision involving retention of halibut by non-hook gear requires permission from the IPHC. Authority to define legal gear for halibut retention rests solely with the Halibut Convention between Canada and the United States. As you know, the Commission has previously granted this permission as part of the EFP for the hake fishery, largely because of the small quantities involved. 2. The staff welcomes the initiative to integrate multiple tools (EM, observers, historical data) to estimate halibut mortality rates. We note that multiple methods to determine those rates are presented in the proposals, some with more detail and potential applicability than others. There is precedent for using assumed discard mortality rates (DMR), in some Alaskan fisheries. These DMRs are calculated annually from observer data and a three-year average used in bycatch management (see attached paper). However, the data are continually updated via annual observer coverage at 100 % for most fisheries in the Bering Sea. This continuous and comprehensive data collection is a fundamental difference between the proposed EFP (to Text Bering Sea Unknown Bering Sea Canada Hake ENVELOPE(15.612,15.612,66.797,66.797) Pacific |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
ftciteseerx |
language |
English |
description |
submission of proposed electronic monitoring experimental fishing permit (EFP) applications. We have the following comments for your consideration. 1. For all of the proposals, any provision involving retention of halibut by non-hook gear requires permission from the IPHC. Authority to define legal gear for halibut retention rests solely with the Halibut Convention between Canada and the United States. As you know, the Commission has previously granted this permission as part of the EFP for the hake fishery, largely because of the small quantities involved. 2. The staff welcomes the initiative to integrate multiple tools (EM, observers, historical data) to estimate halibut mortality rates. We note that multiple methods to determine those rates are presented in the proposals, some with more detail and potential applicability than others. There is precedent for using assumed discard mortality rates (DMR), in some Alaskan fisheries. These DMRs are calculated annually from observer data and a three-year average used in bycatch management (see attached paper). However, the data are continually updated via annual observer coverage at 100 % for most fisheries in the Bering Sea. This continuous and comprehensive data collection is a fundamental difference between the proposed EFP (to |
author2 |
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives |
format |
Text |
author |
Ms. Dorothy M. Lowman |
spellingShingle |
Ms. Dorothy M. Lowman Pacific Fishery Management Council |
author_facet |
Ms. Dorothy M. Lowman |
author_sort |
Ms. Dorothy |
title |
Pacific Fishery Management Council |
title_short |
Pacific Fishery Management Council |
title_full |
Pacific Fishery Management Council |
title_fullStr |
Pacific Fishery Management Council |
title_full_unstemmed |
Pacific Fishery Management Council |
title_sort |
pacific fishery management council |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.642.1687 http://www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/F5b_SUP_IPHC_Rpt_Ltr_to_PFMC_JUNE2014BB.pdf |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(15.612,15.612,66.797,66.797) |
geographic |
Bering Sea Canada Hake Pacific |
geographic_facet |
Bering Sea Canada Hake Pacific |
genre |
Bering Sea |
genre_facet |
Bering Sea |
op_source |
http://www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/F5b_SUP_IPHC_Rpt_Ltr_to_PFMC_JUNE2014BB.pdf |
op_relation |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.642.1687 http://www.pcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/F5b_SUP_IPHC_Rpt_Ltr_to_PFMC_JUNE2014BB.pdf |
op_rights |
Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. |
_version_ |
1766377972847083520 |