hydrograph separation
We present the isotopic composition of meltwater samples from four seasonal snowpacks: a warm, maritime snowpack in California; a temperate continental snowpack in Vermont; a cold continental snowpack in Colorado; and an Arctic snowpack in Alaska. Despite the very different climate conditions the υ...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.64.898 http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf |
id |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.64.898 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.64.898 2023-05-15T15:09:05+02:00 hydrograph separation Susan Taylor Xiahong Feng Mark Williams James Mcnamara The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.64.898 http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.64.898 http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf text ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T15:54:55Z We present the isotopic composition of meltwater samples from four seasonal snowpacks: a warm, maritime snowpack in California; a temperate continental snowpack in Vermont; a cold continental snowpack in Colorado; and an Arctic snowpack in Alaska. Despite the very different climate conditions the υ 18 O of meltwater from all four snowpacks increased as melting progressed. This trend is consistent with theoretical results that model isotopic exchange between water and ice as meltwater percolates through a snowpack. We have estimated the systematic error in the hydrograph separation if the isotopic composition of a snow core were used in place of that of meltwater. Assuming no error in the old water or stream water values, the error in the new water fraction depends on: (1) the isotopic difference between the snow core and the old water; (2) the isotopic difference between the snow core and the meltwater; and (3) the new water fraction contributing to the stream flow during a spring melt event. The error is large when snowmelt contributes a dominant fraction of the stream flow, which may be expected where infiltration of snowmelt is limited (e.g. permafrost, urban areas). A particular challenge will be how to incorporate the changes in isotopic composition of meltwater measured at a point into hydrograph separation models conducted at the watershed scale. Published in 2002 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. KEY WORDS snowmelt; 18 O; new water component; hydrograph separation; error analysis Text Arctic Ice permafrost Alaska Unknown Arctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
ftciteseerx |
language |
English |
description |
We present the isotopic composition of meltwater samples from four seasonal snowpacks: a warm, maritime snowpack in California; a temperate continental snowpack in Vermont; a cold continental snowpack in Colorado; and an Arctic snowpack in Alaska. Despite the very different climate conditions the υ 18 O of meltwater from all four snowpacks increased as melting progressed. This trend is consistent with theoretical results that model isotopic exchange between water and ice as meltwater percolates through a snowpack. We have estimated the systematic error in the hydrograph separation if the isotopic composition of a snow core were used in place of that of meltwater. Assuming no error in the old water or stream water values, the error in the new water fraction depends on: (1) the isotopic difference between the snow core and the old water; (2) the isotopic difference between the snow core and the meltwater; and (3) the new water fraction contributing to the stream flow during a spring melt event. The error is large when snowmelt contributes a dominant fraction of the stream flow, which may be expected where infiltration of snowmelt is limited (e.g. permafrost, urban areas). A particular challenge will be how to incorporate the changes in isotopic composition of meltwater measured at a point into hydrograph separation models conducted at the watershed scale. Published in 2002 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. KEY WORDS snowmelt; 18 O; new water component; hydrograph separation; error analysis |
author2 |
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives |
format |
Text |
author |
Susan Taylor Xiahong Feng Mark Williams James Mcnamara |
spellingShingle |
Susan Taylor Xiahong Feng Mark Williams James Mcnamara hydrograph separation |
author_facet |
Susan Taylor Xiahong Feng Mark Williams James Mcnamara |
author_sort |
Susan Taylor |
title |
hydrograph separation |
title_short |
hydrograph separation |
title_full |
hydrograph separation |
title_fullStr |
hydrograph separation |
title_full_unstemmed |
hydrograph separation |
title_sort |
hydrograph separation |
url |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.64.898 http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic Ice permafrost Alaska |
genre_facet |
Arctic Ice permafrost Alaska |
op_source |
http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf |
op_relation |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.64.898 http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf |
op_rights |
Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. |
_version_ |
1766340310070198272 |