hydrograph separation

We present the isotopic composition of meltwater samples from four seasonal snowpacks: a warm, maritime snowpack in California; a temperate continental snowpack in Vermont; a cold continental snowpack in Colorado; and an Arctic snowpack in Alaska. Despite the very different climate conditions the υ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susan Taylor, Xiahong Feng, Mark Williams, James Mcnamara
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Ice
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.64.898
http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.64.898
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.64.898 2023-05-15T15:09:05+02:00 hydrograph separation Susan Taylor Xiahong Feng Mark Williams James Mcnamara The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.64.898 http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.64.898 http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf text ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T15:54:55Z We present the isotopic composition of meltwater samples from four seasonal snowpacks: a warm, maritime snowpack in California; a temperate continental snowpack in Vermont; a cold continental snowpack in Colorado; and an Arctic snowpack in Alaska. Despite the very different climate conditions the υ 18 O of meltwater from all four snowpacks increased as melting progressed. This trend is consistent with theoretical results that model isotopic exchange between water and ice as meltwater percolates through a snowpack. We have estimated the systematic error in the hydrograph separation if the isotopic composition of a snow core were used in place of that of meltwater. Assuming no error in the old water or stream water values, the error in the new water fraction depends on: (1) the isotopic difference between the snow core and the old water; (2) the isotopic difference between the snow core and the meltwater; and (3) the new water fraction contributing to the stream flow during a spring melt event. The error is large when snowmelt contributes a dominant fraction of the stream flow, which may be expected where infiltration of snowmelt is limited (e.g. permafrost, urban areas). A particular challenge will be how to incorporate the changes in isotopic composition of meltwater measured at a point into hydrograph separation models conducted at the watershed scale. Published in 2002 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. KEY WORDS snowmelt; 18 O; new water component; hydrograph separation; error analysis Text Arctic Ice permafrost Alaska Unknown Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description We present the isotopic composition of meltwater samples from four seasonal snowpacks: a warm, maritime snowpack in California; a temperate continental snowpack in Vermont; a cold continental snowpack in Colorado; and an Arctic snowpack in Alaska. Despite the very different climate conditions the υ 18 O of meltwater from all four snowpacks increased as melting progressed. This trend is consistent with theoretical results that model isotopic exchange between water and ice as meltwater percolates through a snowpack. We have estimated the systematic error in the hydrograph separation if the isotopic composition of a snow core were used in place of that of meltwater. Assuming no error in the old water or stream water values, the error in the new water fraction depends on: (1) the isotopic difference between the snow core and the old water; (2) the isotopic difference between the snow core and the meltwater; and (3) the new water fraction contributing to the stream flow during a spring melt event. The error is large when snowmelt contributes a dominant fraction of the stream flow, which may be expected where infiltration of snowmelt is limited (e.g. permafrost, urban areas). A particular challenge will be how to incorporate the changes in isotopic composition of meltwater measured at a point into hydrograph separation models conducted at the watershed scale. Published in 2002 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. KEY WORDS snowmelt; 18 O; new water component; hydrograph separation; error analysis
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Susan Taylor
Xiahong Feng
Mark Williams
James Mcnamara
spellingShingle Susan Taylor
Xiahong Feng
Mark Williams
James Mcnamara
hydrograph separation
author_facet Susan Taylor
Xiahong Feng
Mark Williams
James Mcnamara
author_sort Susan Taylor
title hydrograph separation
title_short hydrograph separation
title_full hydrograph separation
title_fullStr hydrograph separation
title_full_unstemmed hydrograph separation
title_sort hydrograph separation
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.64.898
http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Ice
permafrost
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
Ice
permafrost
Alaska
op_source http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.64.898
http://snobear.colorado.edu/Markw/Research/taylor.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766340310070198272