INTENSITY OF CHORUS EMISSIONS AND AMPLIFIED WHISTLER-MODE SIGNALS FROM VLF GROUND TRANSMITTERS

Magnetospheric whistler mode waves in the magnetosphere, both natural and man-made (such as those transmitted from Siple Station), play a key role in wave induced particle precipitation (WIPP). The critical parameter is the saturation intensity Bs of these waves, which modify radiation belt dynamics...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Robert A. Helliwell
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.609.1514
http://www.ursi.org/Proceedings/ProcGA02/papers/p0165.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.609.1514
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.609.1514 2023-05-15T13:50:28+02:00 INTENSITY OF CHORUS EMISSIONS AND AMPLIFIED WHISTLER-MODE SIGNALS FROM VLF GROUND TRANSMITTERS Robert A. Helliwell The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.609.1514 http://www.ursi.org/Proceedings/ProcGA02/papers/p0165.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.609.1514 http://www.ursi.org/Proceedings/ProcGA02/papers/p0165.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.ursi.org/Proceedings/ProcGA02/papers/p0165.pdf text ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T14:24:40Z Magnetospheric whistler mode waves in the magnetosphere, both natural and man-made (such as those transmitted from Siple Station), play a key role in wave induced particle precipitation (WIPP). The critical parameter is the saturation intensity Bs of these waves, which modify radiation belt dynamics. The value of Bs also differentiates between the weak-field [1], and strong-field models [2][3], that attempt to explain wave growth and emission triggering. The peak intensities predicted by these two models may differ by an order of magnitude or more. The fundamental difference between them is the assumption of the input field Bin, which in the strong field model is required to be ≥ the trapping value, whereas the weak field model requires no assumption of Bin value and indeed it shows the same saturation value for any value of Bin, assuming no interfering signals along with Bin. Since the growth rate of the Siple pulse is a well-measured parameter, these two models can be tested by finding either the input or the output intensity of these waves at the interaction region (IR) near the magnetic equator for typical duct locations near L=4. To obtain the input Bin to the IR, we can use the signal from the Siple Station transmitter as measured in the F-region above Siple Station, Antarctica by a sounding rocket [4]. A model of the duct [5] is used to calculate the fraction of this incident wave that is captured by the duct. Analysis using the slowly-varying (WKB) approximation shows that the ducted wave falls off in strength versus altitude at about the same rate as for non-ducted waves. This finding allows satellite measurements of non-ducted Siple signals to be used as proxies for the ducted Text Antarc* Antarctica Unknown Siple ENVELOPE(-83.917,-83.917,-75.917,-75.917)
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description Magnetospheric whistler mode waves in the magnetosphere, both natural and man-made (such as those transmitted from Siple Station), play a key role in wave induced particle precipitation (WIPP). The critical parameter is the saturation intensity Bs of these waves, which modify radiation belt dynamics. The value of Bs also differentiates between the weak-field [1], and strong-field models [2][3], that attempt to explain wave growth and emission triggering. The peak intensities predicted by these two models may differ by an order of magnitude or more. The fundamental difference between them is the assumption of the input field Bin, which in the strong field model is required to be ≥ the trapping value, whereas the weak field model requires no assumption of Bin value and indeed it shows the same saturation value for any value of Bin, assuming no interfering signals along with Bin. Since the growth rate of the Siple pulse is a well-measured parameter, these two models can be tested by finding either the input or the output intensity of these waves at the interaction region (IR) near the magnetic equator for typical duct locations near L=4. To obtain the input Bin to the IR, we can use the signal from the Siple Station transmitter as measured in the F-region above Siple Station, Antarctica by a sounding rocket [4]. A model of the duct [5] is used to calculate the fraction of this incident wave that is captured by the duct. Analysis using the slowly-varying (WKB) approximation shows that the ducted wave falls off in strength versus altitude at about the same rate as for non-ducted waves. This finding allows satellite measurements of non-ducted Siple signals to be used as proxies for the ducted
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Robert A. Helliwell
spellingShingle Robert A. Helliwell
INTENSITY OF CHORUS EMISSIONS AND AMPLIFIED WHISTLER-MODE SIGNALS FROM VLF GROUND TRANSMITTERS
author_facet Robert A. Helliwell
author_sort Robert A. Helliwell
title INTENSITY OF CHORUS EMISSIONS AND AMPLIFIED WHISTLER-MODE SIGNALS FROM VLF GROUND TRANSMITTERS
title_short INTENSITY OF CHORUS EMISSIONS AND AMPLIFIED WHISTLER-MODE SIGNALS FROM VLF GROUND TRANSMITTERS
title_full INTENSITY OF CHORUS EMISSIONS AND AMPLIFIED WHISTLER-MODE SIGNALS FROM VLF GROUND TRANSMITTERS
title_fullStr INTENSITY OF CHORUS EMISSIONS AND AMPLIFIED WHISTLER-MODE SIGNALS FROM VLF GROUND TRANSMITTERS
title_full_unstemmed INTENSITY OF CHORUS EMISSIONS AND AMPLIFIED WHISTLER-MODE SIGNALS FROM VLF GROUND TRANSMITTERS
title_sort intensity of chorus emissions and amplified whistler-mode signals from vlf ground transmitters
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.609.1514
http://www.ursi.org/Proceedings/ProcGA02/papers/p0165.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-83.917,-83.917,-75.917,-75.917)
geographic Siple
geographic_facet Siple
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source http://www.ursi.org/Proceedings/ProcGA02/papers/p0165.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.609.1514
http://www.ursi.org/Proceedings/ProcGA02/papers/p0165.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766253518130249728