1I would like to thank the members of my dissertation committee, namely Joel Slemrod

• Main Authors: Jim Hines, John Laitner, Yan Chen, Charlie Brown, Clemens Sialm, Dan Silverman
• Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
• Format: Text
• Language: English
• Published: 2003
• Subjects: Iceland
• Online Access: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.598.5012

Michigan and the University of Iceland for comments on an earlier draft of this paper. This paper analyzes the effect of personal income taxation on the sensitivity of executive compensation to company performance and the use of stock option and restricted stock grants underlying this sensitivity. The theoretical model predicts that, if a single tax rate applies to the entire compensation package, an increase in the tax rate weakly diminishes the equilibrium level of managerial effort and the after-tax pay-to-performance sensitivity, with the effect on the pre-tax pay-to-performance sensitivity being ambiguous. When salary and option gains are taxed at a higher rate than stock gains, tax changes also induce shifting among the individual compensation instruments. Interestingly, this differential taxation leads to a positive amount of stocks in the compensation contract even in the absence of any desire to incentivize the manager. In addition, an increase in the tax rate applied to salary and option gains may increase the level of managerial effort in equilibrium. On the other hand, an increase in the tax rate applied to stock gains weakly decreases the