Changes in primary productivity and chlorophyll a in response to iron fertilization

EisenEx—the second in situ iron enrichment experiment in the Southern Ocean—was performed in the Atlantic sector over 3 weeks in November 2000 with the overarching goal to test the hypothesis that primary productivity in the Southern Ocean is limited by iron availability in the austral spring. Under...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Frank Gervais, Ulf Riebesell, Maxim Y. Gorbunov
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2002
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.574.625
http://www.aslo.org/lo/toc/vol_47/issue_5/1324.pdf
Description
Summary:EisenEx—the second in situ iron enrichment experiment in the Southern Ocean—was performed in the Atlantic sector over 3 weeks in November 2000 with the overarching goal to test the hypothesis that primary productivity in the Southern Ocean is limited by iron availability in the austral spring. Underwater irradiance, chlorophyll a (Chl a), photochemical efficiency, and primary productivity were measured inside and outside of an iron-enriched patch in order to quantify the response of phytoplankton to iron fertilization. Chl a concentration and photosynthetic rate (14C uptake in simulated in situ incubations) were measured in pico-, nano-, and microphytoplankton. Photo-chemical efficiency was studied with fast repetition rate fluorometry and xenon–pulse amplitude modulated fluo-rometry. The high-nutrient low-chlorophyll waters outside the Fe-enriched patch were characterized by deep eu-photic zones (63–72 m), low Chl a (48–56 mg m22), low photosynthetic efficiency (Fv/Fm ø 0.3), and low daily primary productivity (130–220 mg C m22 d21). Between 70 and 90 % of Chl a was found in pico- and nanophy-toplankton. During the induced bloom, Fv/Fm increased up to;0.55, primary productivity and Chl a reached the maximum values of 790 mg C m22 d21 and 231 mg Chl a m22, respectively. As a consequence, the euphotic depth decreased to;41 m. Picophytoplankton biomass hardly changed. Nano- and microphytoplankton biomass increased. In the first 2 weeks of the experiment, when the depth of the upper mixed layer was mostly,40 m, primary