The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north

ABSTRACT. This article examines how US policy makers relate to the European Arctic as an oil and gas region, and more specifically to Norway’s efforts to promote the region through its high north policy. The ‘high north ’ is defined as the Norwegian and Russian sectors of the Barents Sea. The Norweg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kristine Offerdal
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.572.5674
http://www.fni.no/doc%26pdf/kro-pr-2009.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.572.5674
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.572.5674 2023-05-15T14:59:21+02:00 The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north Kristine Offerdal The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2008 application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.572.5674 http://www.fni.no/doc%26pdf/kro-pr-2009.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.572.5674 http://www.fni.no/doc%26pdf/kro-pr-2009.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.fni.no/doc%26pdf/kro-pr-2009.pdf text 2008 ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T12:35:56Z ABSTRACT. This article examines how US policy makers relate to the European Arctic as an oil and gas region, and more specifically to Norway’s efforts to promote the region through its high north policy. The ‘high north ’ is defined as the Norwegian and Russian sectors of the Barents Sea. The Norwegian assumption that northern oil and gas is of interest to the international community is tested by analysing and explaining the character of the US approach, with an assessment of whether Norway has succeeded in influencing how the USA views the high north as an energy region. Norway has managed to raise the awareness of the high north as an energy region in Washington, but the interest in the topic has been moderate. Moreover, Norwegian policy makers in the first phase of the high north initiative have misinterpreted US officials ’ definition of the situation in which Washington’s foreign energy policy is developed. Ironically, Norway’s ‘exemplary ’ energy policy has led to less response than was initially expected, whereas Russia seems to be of significantly greater interest for the USA. With its relatively small resource potential, straightforward investment climate and unclear high north strategy, Norway and its high north do not stand out as very interesting to the USA, which tends to direct more attention to cases in which its oil and gas companies work under more uncertain investment framework conditions in regions with huge energy resources. Contents Text Arctic Barents Sea Unknown Arctic Barents Sea Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description ABSTRACT. This article examines how US policy makers relate to the European Arctic as an oil and gas region, and more specifically to Norway’s efforts to promote the region through its high north policy. The ‘high north ’ is defined as the Norwegian and Russian sectors of the Barents Sea. The Norwegian assumption that northern oil and gas is of interest to the international community is tested by analysing and explaining the character of the US approach, with an assessment of whether Norway has succeeded in influencing how the USA views the high north as an energy region. Norway has managed to raise the awareness of the high north as an energy region in Washington, but the interest in the topic has been moderate. Moreover, Norwegian policy makers in the first phase of the high north initiative have misinterpreted US officials ’ definition of the situation in which Washington’s foreign energy policy is developed. Ironically, Norway’s ‘exemplary ’ energy policy has led to less response than was initially expected, whereas Russia seems to be of significantly greater interest for the USA. With its relatively small resource potential, straightforward investment climate and unclear high north strategy, Norway and its high north do not stand out as very interesting to the USA, which tends to direct more attention to cases in which its oil and gas companies work under more uncertain investment framework conditions in regions with huge energy resources. Contents
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Kristine Offerdal
spellingShingle Kristine Offerdal
The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north
author_facet Kristine Offerdal
author_sort Kristine Offerdal
title The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north
title_short The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north
title_full The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north
title_fullStr The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north
title_full_unstemmed The European Arctic in US foreign energy policy: the case of the Norwegian high north
title_sort european arctic in us foreign energy policy: the case of the norwegian high north
publishDate 2008
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.572.5674
http://www.fni.no/doc%26pdf/kro-pr-2009.pdf
geographic Arctic
Barents Sea
Norway
geographic_facet Arctic
Barents Sea
Norway
genre Arctic
Barents Sea
genre_facet Arctic
Barents Sea
op_source http://www.fni.no/doc%26pdf/kro-pr-2009.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.572.5674
http://www.fni.no/doc%26pdf/kro-pr-2009.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766331462608486400