Grizzly bears and forestry I. Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in

We examined if clearcuts were selected as habitats by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos L.) in west-central Alberta during three seasons: hypophagia, early hyperphagia, and late hyperphagia. Our objectives were to describe seasonal habitat selection of clearcuts using resource selection functions at two s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Scott E. Nielsena, Mark S. Boycea, Gordon B. Stenhouseb
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.562.339
http://www.cfr.washington.edu/classes.esrm.450/Nielsen_etal_2004.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.562.339
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.562.339 2023-05-15T18:42:10+02:00 Grizzly bears and forestry I. Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in Scott E. Nielsena Mark S. Boycea Gordon B. Stenhouseb The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2004 application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.562.339 http://www.cfr.washington.edu/classes.esrm.450/Nielsen_etal_2004.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.562.339 http://www.cfr.washington.edu/classes.esrm.450/Nielsen_etal_2004.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.cfr.washington.edu/classes.esrm.450/Nielsen_etal_2004.pdf text 2004 ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T12:06:03Z We examined if clearcuts were selected as habitats by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos L.) in west-central Alberta during three seasons: hypophagia, early hyperphagia, and late hyperphagia. Our objectives were to describe seasonal habitat selection of clearcuts using resource selection functions at two scales. At the first scale, we assessed patch or third-order selection by comparing use (radiotelemetry) with study area-wide random locations and a dummy variable identifying whether locations occurred within or outside of clear-cut boundaries. At the second scale, we assessed within-patch or fourth-order selection by comparing locations (use and random) found within clearcuts and environmental covariates of terrain, silviculture, and landscape metrics. Finally, we examined diurnal versus crepuscular/nocturnal use of clearcuts by comparing the two with an expected 50:50 ratio. At the third-order scale, grizzly bears used clearcuts with respect to their availability for hypophagia and late hyperphagia, while selecting clearcuts more than expected during early hyperphagia. Fourth-order habitat selection revealed that landscape metrics, silviculture, and terrain were important predictors of grizzly bear use during hypophagia and late hyperphagia, while terrain appeared to be the most important predictor during early hyperphagia. Overall, grizzly bears avoided clear-cut interiors and preferred clearcuts with higher perimeter-to-edge ratios. Clearcuts were significantly more likely to be used during crepuscular/nocturnal periods. Intermediate-aged (30 years old) clearcuts were selected during hypophagia, whereas recent and old clearcuts were selected during late hyperphagia. Bears tended to avoid clearcuts with Donaren mound preparation, while Text Ursus arctos Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description We examined if clearcuts were selected as habitats by grizzly bears (Ursus arctos L.) in west-central Alberta during three seasons: hypophagia, early hyperphagia, and late hyperphagia. Our objectives were to describe seasonal habitat selection of clearcuts using resource selection functions at two scales. At the first scale, we assessed patch or third-order selection by comparing use (radiotelemetry) with study area-wide random locations and a dummy variable identifying whether locations occurred within or outside of clear-cut boundaries. At the second scale, we assessed within-patch or fourth-order selection by comparing locations (use and random) found within clearcuts and environmental covariates of terrain, silviculture, and landscape metrics. Finally, we examined diurnal versus crepuscular/nocturnal use of clearcuts by comparing the two with an expected 50:50 ratio. At the third-order scale, grizzly bears used clearcuts with respect to their availability for hypophagia and late hyperphagia, while selecting clearcuts more than expected during early hyperphagia. Fourth-order habitat selection revealed that landscape metrics, silviculture, and terrain were important predictors of grizzly bear use during hypophagia and late hyperphagia, while terrain appeared to be the most important predictor during early hyperphagia. Overall, grizzly bears avoided clear-cut interiors and preferred clearcuts with higher perimeter-to-edge ratios. Clearcuts were significantly more likely to be used during crepuscular/nocturnal periods. Intermediate-aged (30 years old) clearcuts were selected during hypophagia, whereas recent and old clearcuts were selected during late hyperphagia. Bears tended to avoid clearcuts with Donaren mound preparation, while
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Scott E. Nielsena
Mark S. Boycea
Gordon B. Stenhouseb
spellingShingle Scott E. Nielsena
Mark S. Boycea
Gordon B. Stenhouseb
Grizzly bears and forestry I. Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in
author_facet Scott E. Nielsena
Mark S. Boycea
Gordon B. Stenhouseb
author_sort Scott E. Nielsena
title Grizzly bears and forestry I. Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in
title_short Grizzly bears and forestry I. Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in
title_full Grizzly bears and forestry I. Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in
title_fullStr Grizzly bears and forestry I. Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in
title_full_unstemmed Grizzly bears and forestry I. Selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in
title_sort grizzly bears and forestry i. selection of clearcuts by grizzly bears in
publishDate 2004
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.562.339
http://www.cfr.washington.edu/classes.esrm.450/Nielsen_etal_2004.pdf
genre Ursus arctos
genre_facet Ursus arctos
op_source http://www.cfr.washington.edu/classes.esrm.450/Nielsen_etal_2004.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.562.339
http://www.cfr.washington.edu/classes.esrm.450/Nielsen_etal_2004.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766231791543255040