Native American Subsistence Issues in US Law

The interplay of treaty rights with the right to culture has produced a variety of results for Native American subsistence hunting and fishing rights in the United States. Where allocation and conservation measures fail to account for cultural considerations, conflict ensues. This paper discusses th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jennifer Sepez-aradanas
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.554.7543
http://faculty.washington.edu/stevehar/Sepez.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.554.7543
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.554.7543 2023-05-15T16:55:06+02:00 Native American Subsistence Issues in US Law Jennifer Sepez-aradanas The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.554.7543 http://faculty.washington.edu/stevehar/Sepez.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.554.7543 http://faculty.washington.edu/stevehar/Sepez.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://faculty.washington.edu/stevehar/Sepez.pdf text ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T11:43:37Z The interplay of treaty rights with the right to culture has produced a variety of results for Native American subsistence hunting and fishing rights in the United States. Where allocation and conservation measures fail to account for cultural considerations, conflict ensues. This paper discusses three examples: waterfowl hunting in Alaska, Northwest salmon fishing, and Inuit and Makah whaling. Each demonstrates that treaty rights are a more powerful force than cultural rights in the law, but that both play important roles in actual policy outcomes. A more detailed examination of whaling indicates how the insertion of needs-based criteria into a framework of cultural rights shifts the benefit of presumption away from indigenous groups. The cultural revival issues and conflicting paradigms involved in Makah whaling policy debates indicate how notions of tradition, authenticity, and self-determination complicate the process of producing resource policies that recognize cultural diversity. Key Words cultural revival hunting Inuit Makah whaling Hunting and fishing rights have been a major source of conflict for indigen-ous groups seeking to maintain or regain access to natural resources. The right to culture is one of the bases for asserting these rights, but frequently it has been insufficient to protect them from encroachment by state and national governments. This paper compares the controversy over whaling by the Makah Indian tribe with similar conflicts to elucidate some of the common difficulties Native American resource users face in enacting the right to culture, and the treatment these issues have received under US law. It also examines some issues specific to Makah whaling that reveal how cultural revival is an important aspect of the right to culture which presents special challenges. Treaty rights emerge as a powerful legal force in shaping subsistence rights for tribes in the United States, with strong influences on and interplay with the concept of cultural rights. Text inuit Alaska Unknown Indian
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description The interplay of treaty rights with the right to culture has produced a variety of results for Native American subsistence hunting and fishing rights in the United States. Where allocation and conservation measures fail to account for cultural considerations, conflict ensues. This paper discusses three examples: waterfowl hunting in Alaska, Northwest salmon fishing, and Inuit and Makah whaling. Each demonstrates that treaty rights are a more powerful force than cultural rights in the law, but that both play important roles in actual policy outcomes. A more detailed examination of whaling indicates how the insertion of needs-based criteria into a framework of cultural rights shifts the benefit of presumption away from indigenous groups. The cultural revival issues and conflicting paradigms involved in Makah whaling policy debates indicate how notions of tradition, authenticity, and self-determination complicate the process of producing resource policies that recognize cultural diversity. Key Words cultural revival hunting Inuit Makah whaling Hunting and fishing rights have been a major source of conflict for indigen-ous groups seeking to maintain or regain access to natural resources. The right to culture is one of the bases for asserting these rights, but frequently it has been insufficient to protect them from encroachment by state and national governments. This paper compares the controversy over whaling by the Makah Indian tribe with similar conflicts to elucidate some of the common difficulties Native American resource users face in enacting the right to culture, and the treatment these issues have received under US law. It also examines some issues specific to Makah whaling that reveal how cultural revival is an important aspect of the right to culture which presents special challenges. Treaty rights emerge as a powerful legal force in shaping subsistence rights for tribes in the United States, with strong influences on and interplay with the concept of cultural rights.
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Jennifer Sepez-aradanas
spellingShingle Jennifer Sepez-aradanas
Native American Subsistence Issues in US Law
author_facet Jennifer Sepez-aradanas
author_sort Jennifer Sepez-aradanas
title Native American Subsistence Issues in US Law
title_short Native American Subsistence Issues in US Law
title_full Native American Subsistence Issues in US Law
title_fullStr Native American Subsistence Issues in US Law
title_full_unstemmed Native American Subsistence Issues in US Law
title_sort native american subsistence issues in us law
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.554.7543
http://faculty.washington.edu/stevehar/Sepez.pdf
geographic Indian
geographic_facet Indian
genre inuit
Alaska
genre_facet inuit
Alaska
op_source http://faculty.washington.edu/stevehar/Sepez.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.554.7543
http://faculty.washington.edu/stevehar/Sepez.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766046097537499136