Standards dor Oral Tradition Evidence: Guidelines From First Nations Land Claims in Canada

Conventional land registration systems have served to underpin particular forms of land tenure since ancient Babylon and perhaps before that. However, there are a number of tenure forms which are ill served by the systems that have evolved from these early systems. For example, 1 billion people live...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael Barry
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.551.4679
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.551.4679
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.551.4679 2023-05-15T16:15:56+02:00 Standards dor Oral Tradition Evidence: Guidelines From First Nations Land Claims in Canada Michael Barry The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.551.4679 en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.551.4679 Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. https://www.fig.net/pub/vietnam/papers/ts02a/ts02a_barry_3644.pdf Standards dor Oral Tradition Evidence Guidelines From First Nations Land text ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T11:34:41Z Conventional land registration systems have served to underpin particular forms of land tenure since ancient Babylon and perhaps before that. However, there are a number of tenure forms which are ill served by the systems that have evolved from these early systems. For example, 1 billion people live in slums in urban areas where tenure systems often draw on both customary and western tenure practices and some 300 million First Peoples live in different countries around the world. Insecure tenure is a major issue for these communities and often result in conflicts and tensions when they try and defend their rights. Nowadays, we have the technology to capture oral tradition and oral history evidence. However, the courts in Canada have struggled to handle evidence which draws on stories that incorporate myth, legend and fact. The common law itself has had to evolve in order to adjudicate Aboriginal land claims fairly and so recognize the unique, sui generis, nature of these rights. A number of Canadian cases in the last twenty years have also developed guiding principles for how oral tradition and oral history evidence should be presented and examined. This in turn provides guidance on how this type of data should be stored and documented. The challenge is to include this data in a land information system in a manner which will be acceptable to the courts. Text First Nations Unknown Babylon ENVELOPE(12.539,12.539,66.081,66.081) Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
topic Standards dor Oral Tradition Evidence
Guidelines From First Nations Land
spellingShingle Standards dor Oral Tradition Evidence
Guidelines From First Nations Land
Michael Barry
Standards dor Oral Tradition Evidence: Guidelines From First Nations Land Claims in Canada
topic_facet Standards dor Oral Tradition Evidence
Guidelines From First Nations Land
description Conventional land registration systems have served to underpin particular forms of land tenure since ancient Babylon and perhaps before that. However, there are a number of tenure forms which are ill served by the systems that have evolved from these early systems. For example, 1 billion people live in slums in urban areas where tenure systems often draw on both customary and western tenure practices and some 300 million First Peoples live in different countries around the world. Insecure tenure is a major issue for these communities and often result in conflicts and tensions when they try and defend their rights. Nowadays, we have the technology to capture oral tradition and oral history evidence. However, the courts in Canada have struggled to handle evidence which draws on stories that incorporate myth, legend and fact. The common law itself has had to evolve in order to adjudicate Aboriginal land claims fairly and so recognize the unique, sui generis, nature of these rights. A number of Canadian cases in the last twenty years have also developed guiding principles for how oral tradition and oral history evidence should be presented and examined. This in turn provides guidance on how this type of data should be stored and documented. The challenge is to include this data in a land information system in a manner which will be acceptable to the courts.
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Michael Barry
author_facet Michael Barry
author_sort Michael Barry
title Standards dor Oral Tradition Evidence: Guidelines From First Nations Land Claims in Canada
title_short Standards dor Oral Tradition Evidence: Guidelines From First Nations Land Claims in Canada
title_full Standards dor Oral Tradition Evidence: Guidelines From First Nations Land Claims in Canada
title_fullStr Standards dor Oral Tradition Evidence: Guidelines From First Nations Land Claims in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Standards dor Oral Tradition Evidence: Guidelines From First Nations Land Claims in Canada
title_sort standards dor oral tradition evidence: guidelines from first nations land claims in canada
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.551.4679
long_lat ENVELOPE(12.539,12.539,66.081,66.081)
geographic Babylon
Canada
geographic_facet Babylon
Canada
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source https://www.fig.net/pub/vietnam/papers/ts02a/ts02a_barry_3644.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.551.4679
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766001797150801920