Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. Arctic 58(1

ABSTRACT. In Canada’s Northwest Territories, governments, industrial corporations, and other organizations have tried many strategies to promote the meaningful consideration of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making, acknowledging that such consideration can foster more socially egal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stephen C. Ellis
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.542.4606
http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic58-1-66.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.542.4606
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.542.4606 2023-05-15T14:19:50+02:00 Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. Arctic 58(1 Stephen C. Ellis The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.542.4606 http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic58-1-66.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.542.4606 http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic58-1-66.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic58-1-66.pdf text ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T11:07:55Z ABSTRACT. In Canada’s Northwest Territories, governments, industrial corporations, and other organizations have tried many strategies to promote the meaningful consideration of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making, acknowledging that such consideration can foster more socially egalitarian and environmentally sustainable relationships between human societies and Nature. These initiatives have taken the form of both “top-down ” strategies (preparing environmental governance authorities to receive traditional knowledge) and “bottom-up ” strategies (fostering the capacity of aboriginal people to bring traditional knowledge to bear in environmental decision making). Unfortunately, most of these strategies have had only marginally beneficial effects, primarily because they failed to overcome certain significant barriers. These include communication barriers, arising from the different languages and styles of expression used by traditional knowledge holders; conceptual barriers, stemming from the organizations ’ difficulties in comprehending the values, practices, and context underlying traditional knowledge; and political barriers, resulting from an unwillingness to acknowledge traditional-knowledge messages that may conflict with the agendas of government or industry. Still other barriers emanate from the co-opting of traditional knowledge by non-aboriginal researchers and their institutions. These barriers help maintain a power imbalance between the practitioners of science and European-style environmental governance and the aboriginal people and their traditional knowledge. This imbalance fosters the rejection of traditional knowledge or its transformation and assimilation into Euro-Canadian ways of knowing and doing. Key words: traditional knowledge, environment, aboriginal, governance, power, Northwest Territories, policy, management Text Arctic Arctic Northwest Territories Unknown Arctic Northwest Territories
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description ABSTRACT. In Canada’s Northwest Territories, governments, industrial corporations, and other organizations have tried many strategies to promote the meaningful consideration of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making, acknowledging that such consideration can foster more socially egalitarian and environmentally sustainable relationships between human societies and Nature. These initiatives have taken the form of both “top-down ” strategies (preparing environmental governance authorities to receive traditional knowledge) and “bottom-up ” strategies (fostering the capacity of aboriginal people to bring traditional knowledge to bear in environmental decision making). Unfortunately, most of these strategies have had only marginally beneficial effects, primarily because they failed to overcome certain significant barriers. These include communication barriers, arising from the different languages and styles of expression used by traditional knowledge holders; conceptual barriers, stemming from the organizations ’ difficulties in comprehending the values, practices, and context underlying traditional knowledge; and political barriers, resulting from an unwillingness to acknowledge traditional-knowledge messages that may conflict with the agendas of government or industry. Still other barriers emanate from the co-opting of traditional knowledge by non-aboriginal researchers and their institutions. These barriers help maintain a power imbalance between the practitioners of science and European-style environmental governance and the aboriginal people and their traditional knowledge. This imbalance fosters the rejection of traditional knowledge or its transformation and assimilation into Euro-Canadian ways of knowing and doing. Key words: traditional knowledge, environment, aboriginal, governance, power, Northwest Territories, policy, management
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Stephen C. Ellis
spellingShingle Stephen C. Ellis
Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. Arctic 58(1
author_facet Stephen C. Ellis
author_sort Stephen C. Ellis
title Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. Arctic 58(1
title_short Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. Arctic 58(1
title_full Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. Arctic 58(1
title_fullStr Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. Arctic 58(1
title_full_unstemmed Meaningful consideration? A review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. Arctic 58(1
title_sort meaningful consideration? a review of traditional knowledge in environmental decision making. arctic 58(1
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.542.4606
http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic58-1-66.pdf
geographic Arctic
Northwest Territories
geographic_facet Arctic
Northwest Territories
genre Arctic
Arctic
Northwest Territories
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Northwest Territories
op_source http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic58-1-66.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.542.4606
http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic58-1-66.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766291550517592064