Fig. 1. Arctophila fulva (Trin.) Anders. in a shallow pond. Fig. 2. A fragment of Dryas octopetala tundra. Photo: A. 1. Zubkov SOME REGULARITIES IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE VEGETATION IN THE ARCTIC TUNDRA*

T HE necessity for dividing the tundra area into subzones had been recog- nized in the nineteenth century, and during that century and at the beginning of the twentieth it was frequently mentioned by Baer, Ruprecht, Schrenk, Tanfiliev, and Pohle. Trautfetter (1851) showed on the map of European Russ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: V. D. Aleksandrovat
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.541.6509
http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic13-3-146.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.541.6509
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.541.6509 2023-05-15T14:19:32+02:00 Fig. 1. Arctophila fulva (Trin.) Anders. in a shallow pond. Fig. 2. A fragment of Dryas octopetala tundra. Photo: A. 1. Zubkov SOME REGULARITIES IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE VEGETATION IN THE ARCTIC TUNDRA* V. D. Aleksandrovat The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.541.6509 http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic13-3-146.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.541.6509 http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic13-3-146.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic13-3-146.pdf text ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T11:05:42Z T HE necessity for dividing the tundra area into subzones had been recog- nized in the nineteenth century, and during that century and at the beginning of the twentieth it was frequently mentioned by Baer, Ruprecht, Schrenk, Tanfiliev, and Pohle. Trautfetter (1851) showed on the map of European Russia a “tundra region ” and subdivided it into two districts: that of “alpine willow”, which approximately corresponds to the present “arctic tundra ” subzone, and that of “dwarf birch”, which approximately corresponds to the present “typical (or moss and lichen) tundra ” and “dwarf shrub tundra ” subzones (see Phytogeographical Map of the U.S.S.R., Scale 1: 4,000,000, Acad. of Science of the USSR Press, Leningrad, 1956). It was not until 1916 that Gorodkov in his classic “An attempt to divide the west Siberian lowland into phytogeographical districts ” (Gorodkov 1916) provided the first division of the large northern area between the Urals and the Yenisey River into well-defined phytogeographical districts. Among them he recognized and described the “arctic tundra ” subzone, which there includes the northern parts of the Yamal and Gydan peninsulas and borders in the south on the “typical tundra ” subzone. The term “arctic tundra subzone” was applied to the northernmost floristic subzones in the USSR also by Berg (1930), but he did not show their boundaries on account of lack of data. In the early 1930’s many workers tackled the problem (Andreev 1932 Text Arctic Arctic Arctophila fulva Dryas octopetala Dwarf birch Tundra yenisey river Unknown Arctic Trautfetter ENVELOPE(100.164,100.164,75.432,75.432) Yenisey ENVELOPE(82.680,82.680,71.828,71.828)
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description T HE necessity for dividing the tundra area into subzones had been recog- nized in the nineteenth century, and during that century and at the beginning of the twentieth it was frequently mentioned by Baer, Ruprecht, Schrenk, Tanfiliev, and Pohle. Trautfetter (1851) showed on the map of European Russia a “tundra region ” and subdivided it into two districts: that of “alpine willow”, which approximately corresponds to the present “arctic tundra ” subzone, and that of “dwarf birch”, which approximately corresponds to the present “typical (or moss and lichen) tundra ” and “dwarf shrub tundra ” subzones (see Phytogeographical Map of the U.S.S.R., Scale 1: 4,000,000, Acad. of Science of the USSR Press, Leningrad, 1956). It was not until 1916 that Gorodkov in his classic “An attempt to divide the west Siberian lowland into phytogeographical districts ” (Gorodkov 1916) provided the first division of the large northern area between the Urals and the Yenisey River into well-defined phytogeographical districts. Among them he recognized and described the “arctic tundra ” subzone, which there includes the northern parts of the Yamal and Gydan peninsulas and borders in the south on the “typical tundra ” subzone. The term “arctic tundra subzone” was applied to the northernmost floristic subzones in the USSR also by Berg (1930), but he did not show their boundaries on account of lack of data. In the early 1930’s many workers tackled the problem (Andreev 1932
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author V. D. Aleksandrovat
spellingShingle V. D. Aleksandrovat
Fig. 1. Arctophila fulva (Trin.) Anders. in a shallow pond. Fig. 2. A fragment of Dryas octopetala tundra. Photo: A. 1. Zubkov SOME REGULARITIES IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE VEGETATION IN THE ARCTIC TUNDRA*
author_facet V. D. Aleksandrovat
author_sort V. D. Aleksandrovat
title Fig. 1. Arctophila fulva (Trin.) Anders. in a shallow pond. Fig. 2. A fragment of Dryas octopetala tundra. Photo: A. 1. Zubkov SOME REGULARITIES IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE VEGETATION IN THE ARCTIC TUNDRA*
title_short Fig. 1. Arctophila fulva (Trin.) Anders. in a shallow pond. Fig. 2. A fragment of Dryas octopetala tundra. Photo: A. 1. Zubkov SOME REGULARITIES IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE VEGETATION IN THE ARCTIC TUNDRA*
title_full Fig. 1. Arctophila fulva (Trin.) Anders. in a shallow pond. Fig. 2. A fragment of Dryas octopetala tundra. Photo: A. 1. Zubkov SOME REGULARITIES IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE VEGETATION IN THE ARCTIC TUNDRA*
title_fullStr Fig. 1. Arctophila fulva (Trin.) Anders. in a shallow pond. Fig. 2. A fragment of Dryas octopetala tundra. Photo: A. 1. Zubkov SOME REGULARITIES IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE VEGETATION IN THE ARCTIC TUNDRA*
title_full_unstemmed Fig. 1. Arctophila fulva (Trin.) Anders. in a shallow pond. Fig. 2. A fragment of Dryas octopetala tundra. Photo: A. 1. Zubkov SOME REGULARITIES IN THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE VEGETATION IN THE ARCTIC TUNDRA*
title_sort fig. 1. arctophila fulva (trin.) anders. in a shallow pond. fig. 2. a fragment of dryas octopetala tundra. photo: a. 1. zubkov some regularities in the distribution of the vegetation in the arctic tundra*
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.541.6509
http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic13-3-146.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(100.164,100.164,75.432,75.432)
ENVELOPE(82.680,82.680,71.828,71.828)
geographic Arctic
Trautfetter
Yenisey
geographic_facet Arctic
Trautfetter
Yenisey
genre Arctic
Arctic
Arctophila fulva
Dryas octopetala
Dwarf birch
Tundra
yenisey river
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Arctophila fulva
Dryas octopetala
Dwarf birch
Tundra
yenisey river
op_source http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic13-3-146.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.541.6509
http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/Arctic13-3-146.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766291359534153728