ABSTRACT. The first presumptive evidence of Brucella infection in marine mammals of Arctic Canada is reported. Blood samples were collected from 248 ringed seals (Phoca hispida) and 59 Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) from eight locations in the Canadian Arctic between 1987 and 1994. A c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 1996
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.520.8060
http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic49-4-383.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.520.8060
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.520.8060 2023-05-15T13:19:51+02:00 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 1996 application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.520.8060 http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic49-4-383.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.520.8060 http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic49-4-383.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic49-4-383.pdf text 1996 ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T10:07:25Z ABSTRACT. The first presumptive evidence of Brucella infection in marine mammals of Arctic Canada is reported. Blood samples were collected from 248 ringed seals (Phoca hispida) and 59 Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) from eight locations in the Canadian Arctic between 1987 and 1994. A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA), using a specific monoclonal antibody to Brucella spp. cell wall components, was used to detect anti-Brucella spp. antibodies in the samples. Sera from ten seals and seven walruses exceeded the C-ELISA threshold that indicates that cattle have been exposed to Brucella spp. Five of the positive walrus sera were suitable for the tube agglutination test. All five were confirmed positive using this test. Although the bacterium has not yet been identified, it appears that a Brucella sp. or a Brucella-like bacterium may be enzootic in these species in the Canadian Arctic. It is also possible that the very low prevalence of antibodies in ringed seals and the seemingly random distribution of seropositive animals may indicate a sporadic infection from another enzootically infected phocid or predator (e.g., Arctic fox Alopex lagopus). Or perhaps, limited epizootics may have occurred in the areas where seropositive seals were found. A similar situation could also exist in the walrus of Foxe Basin. Key words: walrus, Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus, ringed seal, Phoca hispida, Brucella, brucellosis, competitive ELISA, tube agglutination test. RÉSUMÉ. On rapporte la première preuve par inférence d’une infection des mammifères marins de l’Arctique canadien par le Text Alopex lagopus Arctic Arctic Fox Arctic Foxe Basin Odobenus rosmarus Phoca hispida ringed seal walrus* Unknown Arctic Canada Foxe Basin ENVELOPE(-77.918,-77.918,65.931,65.931)
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description ABSTRACT. The first presumptive evidence of Brucella infection in marine mammals of Arctic Canada is reported. Blood samples were collected from 248 ringed seals (Phoca hispida) and 59 Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) from eight locations in the Canadian Arctic between 1987 and 1994. A competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (C-ELISA), using a specific monoclonal antibody to Brucella spp. cell wall components, was used to detect anti-Brucella spp. antibodies in the samples. Sera from ten seals and seven walruses exceeded the C-ELISA threshold that indicates that cattle have been exposed to Brucella spp. Five of the positive walrus sera were suitable for the tube agglutination test. All five were confirmed positive using this test. Although the bacterium has not yet been identified, it appears that a Brucella sp. or a Brucella-like bacterium may be enzootic in these species in the Canadian Arctic. It is also possible that the very low prevalence of antibodies in ringed seals and the seemingly random distribution of seropositive animals may indicate a sporadic infection from another enzootically infected phocid or predator (e.g., Arctic fox Alopex lagopus). Or perhaps, limited epizootics may have occurred in the areas where seropositive seals were found. A similar situation could also exist in the walrus of Foxe Basin. Key words: walrus, Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus, ringed seal, Phoca hispida, Brucella, brucellosis, competitive ELISA, tube agglutination test. RÉSUMÉ. On rapporte la première preuve par inférence d’une infection des mammifères marins de l’Arctique canadien par le
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
publishDate 1996
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.520.8060
http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic49-4-383.pdf
long_lat ENVELOPE(-77.918,-77.918,65.931,65.931)
geographic Arctic
Canada
Foxe Basin
geographic_facet Arctic
Canada
Foxe Basin
genre Alopex lagopus
Arctic
Arctic Fox
Arctic
Foxe Basin
Odobenus rosmarus
Phoca hispida
ringed seal
walrus*
genre_facet Alopex lagopus
Arctic
Arctic Fox
Arctic
Foxe Basin
Odobenus rosmarus
Phoca hispida
ringed seal
walrus*
op_source http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic49-4-383.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.520.8060
http://pubs.aina.ucalgary.ca/arctic/arctic49-4-383.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766349934531969024