Reciprocity and constructions of informed consent: Research with indigenous populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5(4), 1–9. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/index First Ojibway Network

Abstract: In this article, the authors present a discussion of institutional re-view boards and potential challenges qualitative researchers may face when presenting human subjects research proposals to these boards for approval. In particular, they focus on issues of consent and reciprocity with In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jason Brent Ellis, Mark A. Earley
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.496.8546
http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_4/pdf/ellis.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.496.8546
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.496.8546 2023-05-15T16:16:01+02:00 Reciprocity and constructions of informed consent: Research with indigenous populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5(4), 1–9. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/index First Ojibway Network Jason Brent Ellis Mark A. Earley The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2006 application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.496.8546 http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_4/pdf/ellis.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.496.8546 http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_4/pdf/ellis.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_4/pdf/ellis.pdf Indigenous peoples First Nations institutional review boards text 2006 ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T08:49:27Z Abstract: In this article, the authors present a discussion of institutional re-view boards and potential challenges qualitative researchers may face when presenting human subjects research proposals to these boards for approval. In particular, they focus on issues of consent and reciprocity with Indigenous populations, whose culture and traditions might be quite different from those review boards typically see. After presenting these issues, the authors close with a framework that can be used as a guide for ethical considerations in re-search with Indigenous peoples. Text First Nations Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
topic Indigenous peoples
First Nations
institutional review boards
spellingShingle Indigenous peoples
First Nations
institutional review boards
Jason Brent Ellis
Mark A. Earley
Reciprocity and constructions of informed consent: Research with indigenous populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5(4), 1–9. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/index First Ojibway Network
topic_facet Indigenous peoples
First Nations
institutional review boards
description Abstract: In this article, the authors present a discussion of institutional re-view boards and potential challenges qualitative researchers may face when presenting human subjects research proposals to these boards for approval. In particular, they focus on issues of consent and reciprocity with Indigenous populations, whose culture and traditions might be quite different from those review boards typically see. After presenting these issues, the authors close with a framework that can be used as a guide for ethical considerations in re-search with Indigenous peoples.
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Jason Brent Ellis
Mark A. Earley
author_facet Jason Brent Ellis
Mark A. Earley
author_sort Jason Brent Ellis
title Reciprocity and constructions of informed consent: Research with indigenous populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5(4), 1–9. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/index First Ojibway Network
title_short Reciprocity and constructions of informed consent: Research with indigenous populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5(4), 1–9. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/index First Ojibway Network
title_full Reciprocity and constructions of informed consent: Research with indigenous populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5(4), 1–9. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/index First Ojibway Network
title_fullStr Reciprocity and constructions of informed consent: Research with indigenous populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5(4), 1–9. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/index First Ojibway Network
title_full_unstemmed Reciprocity and constructions of informed consent: Research with indigenous populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5(4), 1–9. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/index First Ojibway Network
title_sort reciprocity and constructions of informed consent: research with indigenous populations. international journal of qualitative methods. 5(4), 1–9. retrieved june 2, 2008, from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/ijqm/index first ojibway network
publishDate 2006
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.496.8546
http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_4/pdf/ellis.pdf
genre First Nations
genre_facet First Nations
op_source http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_4/pdf/ellis.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.496.8546
http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_4/pdf/ellis.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766001888706166784