Reciprocity and constructions of informed consent: Research with indigenous populations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 5(4), 1–9. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/index First Ojibway Network
Abstract: In this article, the authors present a discussion of institutional re-view boards and potential challenges qualitative researchers may face when presenting human subjects research proposals to these boards for approval. In particular, they focus on issues of consent and reciprocity with In...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2006
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.496.8546 http://www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/5_4/pdf/ellis.pdf |
| Summary: | Abstract: In this article, the authors present a discussion of institutional re-view boards and potential challenges qualitative researchers may face when presenting human subjects research proposals to these boards for approval. In particular, they focus on issues of consent and reciprocity with Indigenous populations, whose culture and traditions might be quite different from those review boards typically see. After presenting these issues, the authors close with a framework that can be used as a guide for ethical considerations in re-search with Indigenous peoples. |
|---|