Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population

The spatial structure of relatedness between individuals in a population can be crucial for social selection and evolution. Here we analyze a female alternative reproductive tactic, conspecific brood parasitism, in relation to spatial relatedness among females in a Baltic Sea population of the commo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Waldeck, A Malte Andersson, A Mikael Kilpi
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.494.1811
http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/1/67.full.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.494.1811
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.494.1811 2023-05-15T15:55:57+02:00 Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population Peter Waldeck A Malte Andersson A Mikael Kilpi The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.494.1811 http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/1/67.full.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.494.1811 http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/1/67.full.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/1/67.full.pdf text ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T08:40:49Z The spatial structure of relatedness between individuals in a population can be crucial for social selection and evolution. Here we analyze a female alternative reproductive tactic, conspecific brood parasitism, in relation to spatial relatedness among females in a Baltic Sea population of the common eider Somateria mollissima. The role of relatedness in brood parasitism is debated: some models predict parasite avoidance of related hosts, others predict host–parasite relatedness. We estimate pairwise relatedness from protein fingerprinting of egg albumen in 156 nests, with pairwise nest distances ranging from 1 m to 6 km. Relatedness increases significantly from the longest distances to an average of r ’ 0.09 below 20 m. Brood parasitism is common, and average pairwise relatedness between host and parasite is estimated at 0.18–0.21. Parasites thus do not avoid relatives, and combined with the findings of a similar study in another eider population, the results show that mean host–parasite relatedness is higher than that among close neighbors. High host–parasite relatedness is therefore not an effect of natal philopatry alone; some other form of kin bias is also involved. Recognition and association between birth nest mates is a candidate mechanism for further study. Key words: joint nesting, kinship, local genetic structure, protein fingerprinting, spatial trend analysis. [Behav Ecol 19:67–73 (2008)] The spatial structure of relatedness among individuals ina population can have important consequences for com-petition, reproductive tactics, sociality, inbreeding, dispersal, and other aspects of population biology (Hamilton 1964; Text Common Eider Somateria mollissima Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description The spatial structure of relatedness between individuals in a population can be crucial for social selection and evolution. Here we analyze a female alternative reproductive tactic, conspecific brood parasitism, in relation to spatial relatedness among females in a Baltic Sea population of the common eider Somateria mollissima. The role of relatedness in brood parasitism is debated: some models predict parasite avoidance of related hosts, others predict host–parasite relatedness. We estimate pairwise relatedness from protein fingerprinting of egg albumen in 156 nests, with pairwise nest distances ranging from 1 m to 6 km. Relatedness increases significantly from the longest distances to an average of r ’ 0.09 below 20 m. Brood parasitism is common, and average pairwise relatedness between host and parasite is estimated at 0.18–0.21. Parasites thus do not avoid relatives, and combined with the findings of a similar study in another eider population, the results show that mean host–parasite relatedness is higher than that among close neighbors. High host–parasite relatedness is therefore not an effect of natal philopatry alone; some other form of kin bias is also involved. Recognition and association between birth nest mates is a candidate mechanism for further study. Key words: joint nesting, kinship, local genetic structure, protein fingerprinting, spatial trend analysis. [Behav Ecol 19:67–73 (2008)] The spatial structure of relatedness among individuals ina population can have important consequences for com-petition, reproductive tactics, sociality, inbreeding, dispersal, and other aspects of population biology (Hamilton 1964;
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Peter Waldeck
A Malte Andersson
A Mikael Kilpi
spellingShingle Peter Waldeck
A Malte Andersson
A Mikael Kilpi
Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
author_facet Peter Waldeck
A Malte Andersson
A Mikael Kilpi
author_sort Peter Waldeck
title Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
title_short Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
title_full Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
title_fullStr Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
title_full_unstemmed Spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
title_sort spatial relatedness and brood parasitism in a female-philopatric bird population
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.494.1811
http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/1/67.full.pdf
genre Common Eider
Somateria mollissima
genre_facet Common Eider
Somateria mollissima
op_source http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/1/67.full.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.494.1811
http://beheco.oxfordjournals.org/content/19/1/67.full.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766391435872960512