in Greenland ice core ” by N.J.G. Pearce et al.

Pearce et al. [2004] compared tephra that was retrieved from Greenlandic ice (by Hammer et al. [2003]) with tephra from Aniakchak, Alaska. Largely on the basis of statistical analyses of the geochemical data, Pearce et al. claimed that the Greenlandic tephra matches with Aniakchak. Herein, those sta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Douglas J. Keenan
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.488.308
http://www.informath.org/G%5E304aS.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.488.308
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.488.308 2023-05-15T16:29:45+02:00 in Greenland ice core ” by N.J.G. Pearce et al. Douglas J. Keenan The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2004 application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.488.308 http://www.informath.org/G%5E304aS.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.488.308 http://www.informath.org/G%5E304aS.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.informath.org/G%5E304aS.pdf text 2004 ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T08:19:05Z Pearce et al. [2004] compared tephra that was retrieved from Greenlandic ice (by Hammer et al. [2003]) with tephra from Aniakchak, Alaska. Largely on the basis of statistical analyses of the geochemical data, Pearce et al. claimed that the Greenlandic tephra matches with Aniakchak. Herein, those statistical analyses are examined. Pearce et al. [2004] devote a section of their paper to discussing the “statistical distance ” between two sets of tephrochronological data. The formula for statistical distance involves standard deviations. The term “standard deviation”, though, can mean different things in different contexts: either the potential error of a measurement (i.e. precision) or the inter-particle dispersion (i.e. indicating variation among different particles). Pearce et al. [2004, table 2, caption] note this distinction when presenting their data. In applying the formula for statistical distance, however, they confuse the two meanings: the formula requires measurement precision, but they use inter-particle dispersion instead. This confusion makes the statistical-distance calculations of Pearce et al. [2004, sect. 6] erroneous. (There is no immediate way of fixing the calculations, because when the correct meaning of “standard deviation ” is used, the D2 statistic of Pearce et al. no longer has a chi-squared distribution.) A second statistical problem with the work of Pearce et al. [2004] is in the use of “relative differences”. The problem is easily seen via a hypothetical example: consider two tephras, both measured by two laboratories, with the following results for SiO2 (on bulk samples, with measurement standard deviations indicated). Text Greenland Greenland ice core greenlandic ice core Alaska Unknown Greenland
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description Pearce et al. [2004] compared tephra that was retrieved from Greenlandic ice (by Hammer et al. [2003]) with tephra from Aniakchak, Alaska. Largely on the basis of statistical analyses of the geochemical data, Pearce et al. claimed that the Greenlandic tephra matches with Aniakchak. Herein, those statistical analyses are examined. Pearce et al. [2004] devote a section of their paper to discussing the “statistical distance ” between two sets of tephrochronological data. The formula for statistical distance involves standard deviations. The term “standard deviation”, though, can mean different things in different contexts: either the potential error of a measurement (i.e. precision) or the inter-particle dispersion (i.e. indicating variation among different particles). Pearce et al. [2004, table 2, caption] note this distinction when presenting their data. In applying the formula for statistical distance, however, they confuse the two meanings: the formula requires measurement precision, but they use inter-particle dispersion instead. This confusion makes the statistical-distance calculations of Pearce et al. [2004, sect. 6] erroneous. (There is no immediate way of fixing the calculations, because when the correct meaning of “standard deviation ” is used, the D2 statistic of Pearce et al. no longer has a chi-squared distribution.) A second statistical problem with the work of Pearce et al. [2004] is in the use of “relative differences”. The problem is easily seen via a hypothetical example: consider two tephras, both measured by two laboratories, with the following results for SiO2 (on bulk samples, with measurement standard deviations indicated).
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Douglas J. Keenan
spellingShingle Douglas J. Keenan
in Greenland ice core ” by N.J.G. Pearce et al.
author_facet Douglas J. Keenan
author_sort Douglas J. Keenan
title in Greenland ice core ” by N.J.G. Pearce et al.
title_short in Greenland ice core ” by N.J.G. Pearce et al.
title_full in Greenland ice core ” by N.J.G. Pearce et al.
title_fullStr in Greenland ice core ” by N.J.G. Pearce et al.
title_full_unstemmed in Greenland ice core ” by N.J.G. Pearce et al.
title_sort in greenland ice core ” by n.j.g. pearce et al.
publishDate 2004
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.488.308
http://www.informath.org/G%5E304aS.pdf
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
Greenland ice core
greenlandic
ice core
Alaska
genre_facet Greenland
Greenland ice core
greenlandic
ice core
Alaska
op_source http://www.informath.org/G%5E304aS.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.488.308
http://www.informath.org/G%5E304aS.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766019456302055424