Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management

ABSTRACT. It is now a policy requirement that “traditional ecological knowledge ” (TEK) be incorporated into environmental assessment and resource management in the North. However, there is little common understanding about what TEK is, and no guidance on how to implement the policy in public arenas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peter J. Usher
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2000
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.474.5055
http://arctic.synergiesprairies.ca/arctic/index.php/arctic/article/viewFile/849/875/
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.474.5055
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.474.5055 2023-05-15T14:18:40+02:00 Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management Peter J. Usher The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2000 http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.474.5055 http://arctic.synergiesprairies.ca/arctic/index.php/arctic/article/viewFile/849/875/ en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.474.5055 http://arctic.synergiesprairies.ca/arctic/index.php/arctic/article/viewFile/849/875/ Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://arctic.synergiesprairies.ca/arctic/index.php/arctic/article/viewFile/849/875/ text 2000 ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T07:29:51Z ABSTRACT. It is now a policy requirement that “traditional ecological knowledge ” (TEK) be incorporated into environmental assessment and resource management in the North. However, there is little common understanding about what TEK is, and no guidance on how to implement the policy in public arenas where knowledge claims must be tested. The problems are inconsistent and unclear definitions of TEK, and insufficient attention to appropriate methods of organizing and presenting it for assessment and management purposes. TEK can be classified as knowledge about the environment, knowledge about the use of the environment, values about the environment, and the knowledge system itself. All categories are required for environmental assessment, but each must be presented and examined differently. TEK and “Western ” science provide partially different information, based on different sets of observations and procedures, and sometimes on different knowledge claims. It is important that TEK be comprehensible and testable as a knowledge claim in public reviews, and usable for ongoing public monitoring and co-management processes. To this end, certain procedures are recommended for recording, organizing, and presenting TEK, with particular emphasis on the need to differentiate between observation and inference or association. Documenting TEK as recommended usually requires trained intermediaries, but they in turn require the support and cooperation of those who have TEK. One consequence is that it is often both impractical and inappropriate to require development proponents to incorporate TEK into their environmental impact statements. However, the environmental assessment process must facilitate the use of TEK in the public review phase. Key words: traditional ecological knowledge, environmental assessment, co-management, research methods, public policy, Canada RÉSUMÉ. Les politiques publiques exigent maintenant que le «savoir écologique traditionnel » (SÉT) soit inclus dans les évaluations environnementales et la gestion ... Text Arctic Unknown Canada
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description ABSTRACT. It is now a policy requirement that “traditional ecological knowledge ” (TEK) be incorporated into environmental assessment and resource management in the North. However, there is little common understanding about what TEK is, and no guidance on how to implement the policy in public arenas where knowledge claims must be tested. The problems are inconsistent and unclear definitions of TEK, and insufficient attention to appropriate methods of organizing and presenting it for assessment and management purposes. TEK can be classified as knowledge about the environment, knowledge about the use of the environment, values about the environment, and the knowledge system itself. All categories are required for environmental assessment, but each must be presented and examined differently. TEK and “Western ” science provide partially different information, based on different sets of observations and procedures, and sometimes on different knowledge claims. It is important that TEK be comprehensible and testable as a knowledge claim in public reviews, and usable for ongoing public monitoring and co-management processes. To this end, certain procedures are recommended for recording, organizing, and presenting TEK, with particular emphasis on the need to differentiate between observation and inference or association. Documenting TEK as recommended usually requires trained intermediaries, but they in turn require the support and cooperation of those who have TEK. One consequence is that it is often both impractical and inappropriate to require development proponents to incorporate TEK into their environmental impact statements. However, the environmental assessment process must facilitate the use of TEK in the public review phase. Key words: traditional ecological knowledge, environmental assessment, co-management, research methods, public policy, Canada RÉSUMÉ. Les politiques publiques exigent maintenant que le «savoir écologique traditionnel » (SÉT) soit inclus dans les évaluations environnementales et la gestion ...
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Peter J. Usher
spellingShingle Peter J. Usher
Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management
author_facet Peter J. Usher
author_sort Peter J. Usher
title Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management
title_short Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management
title_full Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management
title_fullStr Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management
title_full_unstemmed Traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management
title_sort traditional ecological knowledge in environmental assessment and management
publishDate 2000
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.474.5055
http://arctic.synergiesprairies.ca/arctic/index.php/arctic/article/viewFile/849/875/
geographic Canada
geographic_facet Canada
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_source http://arctic.synergiesprairies.ca/arctic/index.php/arctic/article/viewFile/849/875/
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.474.5055
http://arctic.synergiesprairies.ca/arctic/index.php/arctic/article/viewFile/849/875/
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766290163116277760