Update of Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Loss: Exponential?

Shepherd et al. (2012) provide an update of the mass loss by the Greenland ice sheet (and the Antarctic ice sheet). They compare several analysis methods, achieving a reasonably welldefined consensus. The data is 2-3 years more current than data we employed recently (Hansen and Sato, 2012), so a new...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: James Hansen, Makiko Sato
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.397.3177
http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2012/20121226_GreenlandIceSheetUpdate.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.397.3177
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.397.3177 2023-05-15T13:48:05+02:00 Update of Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Loss: Exponential? James Hansen Makiko Sato The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2012 application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.397.3177 http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2012/20121226_GreenlandIceSheetUpdate.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.397.3177 http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2012/20121226_GreenlandIceSheetUpdate.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2012/20121226_GreenlandIceSheetUpdate.pdf text 2012 ftciteseerx 2016-09-25T00:07:09Z Shepherd et al. (2012) provide an update of the mass loss by the Greenland ice sheet (and the Antarctic ice sheet). They compare several analysis methods, achieving a reasonably welldefined consensus. The data is 2-3 years more current than data we employed recently (Hansen and Sato, 2012), so a new look at the data seems warranted. A crucial question is how rapidly the Greenland (or Antarctic) ice sheet can disintegrate in response to global warming. Earth's history makes it clear that burning all fossil fuels would cause eventual sea level rise of tens of meters, thus practically wiping out thousands of cities located on global coast lines. However, there seems to be little political or public interest in what happens next century and beyond, so reports of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) focus on sea level change by 2100, i.e., during the next 87 years. IPCC (2007) suggested a most likely sea level rise of a few tens of centimeters by 2100. Several subsequent papers suggest that sea level rise of ~1 meter is likely by 2100. However, those studies, one way or another, include linearity assumptions, so 1 meter can certainly not be taken as an upper limit on sea level rise (see discussion and references in the appendix below, excerpted from our recent paper). Sea level rise in the past century was nearly linear with global Text Antarc* Antarctic Greenland Ice Sheet Unknown Antarctic Greenland The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description Shepherd et al. (2012) provide an update of the mass loss by the Greenland ice sheet (and the Antarctic ice sheet). They compare several analysis methods, achieving a reasonably welldefined consensus. The data is 2-3 years more current than data we employed recently (Hansen and Sato, 2012), so a new look at the data seems warranted. A crucial question is how rapidly the Greenland (or Antarctic) ice sheet can disintegrate in response to global warming. Earth's history makes it clear that burning all fossil fuels would cause eventual sea level rise of tens of meters, thus practically wiping out thousands of cities located on global coast lines. However, there seems to be little political or public interest in what happens next century and beyond, so reports of the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) focus on sea level change by 2100, i.e., during the next 87 years. IPCC (2007) suggested a most likely sea level rise of a few tens of centimeters by 2100. Several subsequent papers suggest that sea level rise of ~1 meter is likely by 2100. However, those studies, one way or another, include linearity assumptions, so 1 meter can certainly not be taken as an upper limit on sea level rise (see discussion and references in the appendix below, excerpted from our recent paper). Sea level rise in the past century was nearly linear with global
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author James Hansen
Makiko Sato
spellingShingle James Hansen
Makiko Sato
Update of Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Loss: Exponential?
author_facet James Hansen
Makiko Sato
author_sort James Hansen
title Update of Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Loss: Exponential?
title_short Update of Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Loss: Exponential?
title_full Update of Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Loss: Exponential?
title_fullStr Update of Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Loss: Exponential?
title_full_unstemmed Update of Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Loss: Exponential?
title_sort update of greenland ice sheet mass loss: exponential?
publishDate 2012
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.397.3177
http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2012/20121226_GreenlandIceSheetUpdate.pdf
geographic Antarctic
Greenland
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Greenland
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Greenland
Ice Sheet
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Greenland
Ice Sheet
op_source http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2012/20121226_GreenlandIceSheetUpdate.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.397.3177
http://www.columbia.edu/~jeh1/mailings/2012/20121226_GreenlandIceSheetUpdate.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766248567647764480