eight reviewers increased the upper estimates of thermal expansion for a given level of atmospheric forcing by about 15 percent. Of the remaining reviewers, the Balling and Wigley & Raper assumptions both implied substantially lower 1%-high estimates. All of Balling’s estimates had low sensitivi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.391.6035
http://papers.risingsea.net/federal_reports/probability-chapter_3b.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.391.6035
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.391.6035 2023-05-15T13:48:10+02:00 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.391.6035 http://papers.risingsea.net/federal_reports/probability-chapter_3b.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.391.6035 http://papers.risingsea.net/federal_reports/probability-chapter_3b.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://papers.risingsea.net/federal_reports/probability-chapter_3b.pdf Table 3-7 and Figure 3-13 summarize the cumulative text ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T02:16:54Z eight reviewers increased the upper estimates of thermal expansion for a given level of atmospheric forcing by about 15 percent. Of the remaining reviewers, the Balling and Wigley & Raper assumptions both implied substantially lower 1%-high estimates. All of Balling’s estimates had low sensitivities, and because of their narrower range for ∆T 2X Wigley & Raper also had a downward impact. But these moderating assumptions had a small impact on the high end of the range for the overall assessment, for two reasons. First, these comments removed only about 10 percent of the high-temperature simulations. Second, the mathematics of, for example, a normal distribution are such that even if half of the reviewers eliminated all of their high-scenario estimates, the overall 1%-high estimates would rise if the other half of the reviewers increased σ by 15 percent. Perhaps most important, the reviewers expanded the high end of the uncertainty range regarding the polar temperature estimates that the Greenland and Antarctic models use in Chapters 4 and 5. Three of the reviewers substantially increased the high estimates of Greenland temperature sensitivity, outweighing any downward impact on the high end from the revisions suggested by Manabe and MacCracken; the low end of the range was also broadened. Similarly, half of the reviewers suggested that eventually, the Antarctic circumpolar ocean is likely to warm as much as the Earth’s average temperature warms, with three of the reviewers suggesting that the polar water could warm twice as much. Even assuming a lag on the order of one hundred years, such a sensitivity suggests that the Antarctic ocean could warm by 6 to 8˚C in the next two centuries. By comparison, studies of the potential sensitivity of Antarctica have assumed only a 1˚C circumpolar ocean warming (see Chapter 6). If, as the reviewers suggest, there is a significant risk that circumpolar ocean temperatures could warm 4 to 8˚C, recent assessments of the vulnerability of Antarctica may have overlooked the ... Text Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Ocean Antarctica Greenland Unknown Antarctic Antarctic Ocean Greenland The Antarctic
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
topic Table 3-7 and Figure 3-13 summarize the cumulative
spellingShingle Table 3-7 and Figure 3-13 summarize the cumulative
topic_facet Table 3-7 and Figure 3-13 summarize the cumulative
description eight reviewers increased the upper estimates of thermal expansion for a given level of atmospheric forcing by about 15 percent. Of the remaining reviewers, the Balling and Wigley & Raper assumptions both implied substantially lower 1%-high estimates. All of Balling’s estimates had low sensitivities, and because of their narrower range for ∆T 2X Wigley & Raper also had a downward impact. But these moderating assumptions had a small impact on the high end of the range for the overall assessment, for two reasons. First, these comments removed only about 10 percent of the high-temperature simulations. Second, the mathematics of, for example, a normal distribution are such that even if half of the reviewers eliminated all of their high-scenario estimates, the overall 1%-high estimates would rise if the other half of the reviewers increased σ by 15 percent. Perhaps most important, the reviewers expanded the high end of the uncertainty range regarding the polar temperature estimates that the Greenland and Antarctic models use in Chapters 4 and 5. Three of the reviewers substantially increased the high estimates of Greenland temperature sensitivity, outweighing any downward impact on the high end from the revisions suggested by Manabe and MacCracken; the low end of the range was also broadened. Similarly, half of the reviewers suggested that eventually, the Antarctic circumpolar ocean is likely to warm as much as the Earth’s average temperature warms, with three of the reviewers suggesting that the polar water could warm twice as much. Even assuming a lag on the order of one hundred years, such a sensitivity suggests that the Antarctic ocean could warm by 6 to 8˚C in the next two centuries. By comparison, studies of the potential sensitivity of Antarctica have assumed only a 1˚C circumpolar ocean warming (see Chapter 6). If, as the reviewers suggest, there is a significant risk that circumpolar ocean temperatures could warm 4 to 8˚C, recent assessments of the vulnerability of Antarctica may have overlooked the ...
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.391.6035
http://papers.risingsea.net/federal_reports/probability-chapter_3b.pdf
geographic Antarctic
Antarctic Ocean
Greenland
The Antarctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Antarctic Ocean
Greenland
The Antarctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Ocean
Antarctica
Greenland
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Ocean
Antarctica
Greenland
op_source http://papers.risingsea.net/federal_reports/probability-chapter_3b.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.391.6035
http://papers.risingsea.net/federal_reports/probability-chapter_3b.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766248819053297664