SLOWING THE BUILDUP OF FOSSIL CO2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE BY IRON FERTILIZATION: A COMMENT

Can the buildup of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere be reduced significantly by fertilizing the surface southern ocean waters with iron? There are many issues that need to be addressed in answering this question. Is iron scarcity indeed the dominant process limiting biological uptake of carbon, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: J. L. Sarmiento
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.357.9933
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.357.9933
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.357.9933 2023-05-15T18:25:05+02:00 SLOWING THE BUILDUP OF FOSSIL CO2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE BY IRON FERTILIZATION: A COMMENT J. L. Sarmiento The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.357.9933 en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.357.9933 Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. text ftciteseerx 2016-01-08T00:39:47Z Can the buildup of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere be reduced significantly by fertilizing the surface southern ocean waters with iron? There are many issues that need to be addressed in answering this question. Is iron scarcity indeed the dominant process limiting biological uptake of carbon, as has been suggested by Martin [e.g., Martin et al., 1990]? What is the role of zooplankton grazing and light supply? What would be the impact on southern ocean ecology of iron fertilization and its accompanying reduction of subsurface ocean oxygen levels? How does the environmental and economic cost of a fertilization effort compare with the cost of other mitigation strategies focussing, for example, on anthropogenic emissions? Addressing these highly complex issues will require a substantial investment ofresearch resources. It is important that we convince ourselves each step of the way that such expenditures are justified. An important contribution to the debate on this issue has recently been made by Broecker, who has concluded from a series of model studies that even if iron fertilization worked perfectly, the reduction in CO2 of the order of 50+_25 ppm that would result after 100 years of fertilization would not be significant [Broecker, 1990; Peng and Broecker, 1991]. This is for an atmospheric CO2 that would otherwise increase to 500 ppm over that time span, and represents a reduction of 34 % in the increase that would occur Text Southern Ocean Unknown Southern Ocean
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description Can the buildup of anthropogenic CO2 in the atmosphere be reduced significantly by fertilizing the surface southern ocean waters with iron? There are many issues that need to be addressed in answering this question. Is iron scarcity indeed the dominant process limiting biological uptake of carbon, as has been suggested by Martin [e.g., Martin et al., 1990]? What is the role of zooplankton grazing and light supply? What would be the impact on southern ocean ecology of iron fertilization and its accompanying reduction of subsurface ocean oxygen levels? How does the environmental and economic cost of a fertilization effort compare with the cost of other mitigation strategies focussing, for example, on anthropogenic emissions? Addressing these highly complex issues will require a substantial investment ofresearch resources. It is important that we convince ourselves each step of the way that such expenditures are justified. An important contribution to the debate on this issue has recently been made by Broecker, who has concluded from a series of model studies that even if iron fertilization worked perfectly, the reduction in CO2 of the order of 50+_25 ppm that would result after 100 years of fertilization would not be significant [Broecker, 1990; Peng and Broecker, 1991]. This is for an atmospheric CO2 that would otherwise increase to 500 ppm over that time span, and represents a reduction of 34 % in the increase that would occur
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author J. L. Sarmiento
spellingShingle J. L. Sarmiento
SLOWING THE BUILDUP OF FOSSIL CO2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE BY IRON FERTILIZATION: A COMMENT
author_facet J. L. Sarmiento
author_sort J. L. Sarmiento
title SLOWING THE BUILDUP OF FOSSIL CO2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE BY IRON FERTILIZATION: A COMMENT
title_short SLOWING THE BUILDUP OF FOSSIL CO2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE BY IRON FERTILIZATION: A COMMENT
title_full SLOWING THE BUILDUP OF FOSSIL CO2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE BY IRON FERTILIZATION: A COMMENT
title_fullStr SLOWING THE BUILDUP OF FOSSIL CO2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE BY IRON FERTILIZATION: A COMMENT
title_full_unstemmed SLOWING THE BUILDUP OF FOSSIL CO2 IN THE ATMOSPHERE BY IRON FERTILIZATION: A COMMENT
title_sort slowing the buildup of fossil co2 in the atmosphere by iron fertilization: a comment
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.357.9933
geographic Southern Ocean
geographic_facet Southern Ocean
genre Southern Ocean
genre_facet Southern Ocean
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.357.9933
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766206253831290880