2003a), ‘Clashing cosmologies: Contrasting knowledges in the Greenlandic fishery
Current worldwide discussions about management regimes for natural resources are increasingly focusing on forms of knowledge: for example on the discussion on scientific knowledge versus ‘other ’ forms of knowledge (Inglis 1993; Scott 1996; Kalland this issue), be it ‘local’, ‘indigenous’, aborigina...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Aarhus University Press
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.330.1128 http://www.pet.au.dk/~andreas/pages/Files/Clashing cosmologies.pdf |
id |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.330.1128 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.330.1128 2023-05-15T16:31:11+02:00 2003a), ‘Clashing cosmologies: Contrasting knowledges in the Greenlandic fishery Andreas Roepstorff The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.330.1128 http://www.pet.au.dk/~andreas/pages/Files/Clashing cosmologies.pdf en eng Aarhus University Press http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.330.1128 http://www.pet.au.dk/~andreas/pages/Files/Clashing cosmologies.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.pet.au.dk/~andreas/pages/Files/Clashing cosmologies.pdf text ftciteseerx 2016-09-04T00:39:29Z Current worldwide discussions about management regimes for natural resources are increasingly focusing on forms of knowledge: for example on the discussion on scientific knowledge versus ‘other ’ forms of knowledge (Inglis 1993; Scott 1996; Kalland this issue), be it ‘local’, ‘indigenous’, aboriginal, or users ’ knowledge. Many of these discussions have been highly politicised interactions between scientific specialists, administrators and locals. Knowledge has, in other words, become located at the ‘inter-face ’ between the different actors (‘faces’) in the discourse (Roepstorff 2000). When ‘knowledge ’ becomes more of a battleground than a field of mutual exchange, the pieces of knowledge exchanged may appear as politicised free-floating signifiers (see e.g.Agrawal 1995).This veils the fact that the pieces of knowledge discussed are normally derived from another interface: the interface between certain persons and groups and their environment, and therefore that there are important differences in what counts as knowledge and how this is constructed. I have previously suggested (Roepstorff 2000) that a study of the ‘who, what and how ’ of knowledge may be a first step in understanding how conflicts over knowledge Text greenlandic Unknown |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
ftciteseerx |
language |
English |
description |
Current worldwide discussions about management regimes for natural resources are increasingly focusing on forms of knowledge: for example on the discussion on scientific knowledge versus ‘other ’ forms of knowledge (Inglis 1993; Scott 1996; Kalland this issue), be it ‘local’, ‘indigenous’, aboriginal, or users ’ knowledge. Many of these discussions have been highly politicised interactions between scientific specialists, administrators and locals. Knowledge has, in other words, become located at the ‘inter-face ’ between the different actors (‘faces’) in the discourse (Roepstorff 2000). When ‘knowledge ’ becomes more of a battleground than a field of mutual exchange, the pieces of knowledge exchanged may appear as politicised free-floating signifiers (see e.g.Agrawal 1995).This veils the fact that the pieces of knowledge discussed are normally derived from another interface: the interface between certain persons and groups and their environment, and therefore that there are important differences in what counts as knowledge and how this is constructed. I have previously suggested (Roepstorff 2000) that a study of the ‘who, what and how ’ of knowledge may be a first step in understanding how conflicts over knowledge |
author2 |
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives |
format |
Text |
author |
Andreas Roepstorff |
spellingShingle |
Andreas Roepstorff 2003a), ‘Clashing cosmologies: Contrasting knowledges in the Greenlandic fishery |
author_facet |
Andreas Roepstorff |
author_sort |
Andreas Roepstorff |
title |
2003a), ‘Clashing cosmologies: Contrasting knowledges in the Greenlandic fishery |
title_short |
2003a), ‘Clashing cosmologies: Contrasting knowledges in the Greenlandic fishery |
title_full |
2003a), ‘Clashing cosmologies: Contrasting knowledges in the Greenlandic fishery |
title_fullStr |
2003a), ‘Clashing cosmologies: Contrasting knowledges in the Greenlandic fishery |
title_full_unstemmed |
2003a), ‘Clashing cosmologies: Contrasting knowledges in the Greenlandic fishery |
title_sort |
2003a), ‘clashing cosmologies: contrasting knowledges in the greenlandic fishery |
publisher |
Aarhus University Press |
url |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.330.1128 http://www.pet.au.dk/~andreas/pages/Files/Clashing cosmologies.pdf |
genre |
greenlandic |
genre_facet |
greenlandic |
op_source |
http://www.pet.au.dk/~andreas/pages/Files/Clashing cosmologies.pdf |
op_relation |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.330.1128 http://www.pet.au.dk/~andreas/pages/Files/Clashing cosmologies.pdf |
op_rights |
Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. |
_version_ |
1766020951034560512 |