UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities

We introduce here a new method for computing differences between microbial communities based on phylogenetic information. This method, UniFrac, measures the phylogenetic distance between sets of taxa in a phylogenetic tree as the fraction of the branch length of the tree that leads to descendants fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Catherine Lozupone, Rob Knight
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: 2005
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.323.210
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.323.210
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.323.210 2023-05-15T13:38:14+02:00 UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities Catherine Lozupone Rob Knight The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2005 application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.323.210 en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.323.210 Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. https://dsgweb.wustl.edu/SGMF/unifrac.pdf text 2005 ftciteseerx 2016-09-04T00:23:57Z We introduce here a new method for computing differences between microbial communities based on phylogenetic information. This method, UniFrac, measures the phylogenetic distance between sets of taxa in a phylogenetic tree as the fraction of the branch length of the tree that leads to descendants from either one environment or the other, but not both. UniFrac can be used to determine whether communities are significantly different, to compare many communities simultaneously using clustering and ordination techniques, and to measure the relative contributions of different factors, such as chemistry and geography, to similarities between samples. We demonstrate the utility of UniFrac by applying it to published 16S rRNA gene libraries from cultured isolates and environmental clones of bacteria in marine sediment, water, and ice. Our results reveal that (i) cultured isolates from ice, water, and sediment resemble each other and environmental clone sequences from sea ice, but not environmental clone sequences from sediment and water; (ii) the geographical location does not correlate strongly with bacterial community differences in ice and sediment from the Arctic and Antarctic; and (iii) bacterial communities differ between terrestrially impacted seawater (whether polar or temperate) and warm oligotrophic seawater, whereas those in individual seawater samples are not more similar to each other than to those in sediment or ice samples. These results illustrate that UniFrac provides a new way of characterizing microbial communities, using the wealth of environmental rRNA sequences, and Text Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Sea ice Unknown Antarctic Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description We introduce here a new method for computing differences between microbial communities based on phylogenetic information. This method, UniFrac, measures the phylogenetic distance between sets of taxa in a phylogenetic tree as the fraction of the branch length of the tree that leads to descendants from either one environment or the other, but not both. UniFrac can be used to determine whether communities are significantly different, to compare many communities simultaneously using clustering and ordination techniques, and to measure the relative contributions of different factors, such as chemistry and geography, to similarities between samples. We demonstrate the utility of UniFrac by applying it to published 16S rRNA gene libraries from cultured isolates and environmental clones of bacteria in marine sediment, water, and ice. Our results reveal that (i) cultured isolates from ice, water, and sediment resemble each other and environmental clone sequences from sea ice, but not environmental clone sequences from sediment and water; (ii) the geographical location does not correlate strongly with bacterial community differences in ice and sediment from the Arctic and Antarctic; and (iii) bacterial communities differ between terrestrially impacted seawater (whether polar or temperate) and warm oligotrophic seawater, whereas those in individual seawater samples are not more similar to each other than to those in sediment or ice samples. These results illustrate that UniFrac provides a new way of characterizing microbial communities, using the wealth of environmental rRNA sequences, and
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Catherine Lozupone
Rob Knight
spellingShingle Catherine Lozupone
Rob Knight
UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities
author_facet Catherine Lozupone
Rob Knight
author_sort Catherine Lozupone
title UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities
title_short UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities
title_full UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities
title_fullStr UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities
title_full_unstemmed UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities
title_sort unifrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities
publishDate 2005
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.323.210
geographic Antarctic
Arctic
geographic_facet Antarctic
Arctic
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Arctic
Sea ice
op_source https://dsgweb.wustl.edu/SGMF/unifrac.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.323.210
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766103128067801088