ENHANCED DESIGN CHECKING INVOLVING CONSTRAINTS, COLLABORATION AND ASSUMPTIONS -- Ontology-supported Rationale for Collaborative Argumentation
The design process involves selecting between design alternatives based on the requirements and constraints defining the system being developed. The design alternatives and the reasons for selecting one over another form the Design Rationale (DR) for the system. This information represents the desig...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.304.3061 http://www.springerlink.com/content/n06gw87k457484w6/fulltext.pdf |
id |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.304.3061 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.304.3061 2023-05-15T17:53:37+02:00 ENHANCED DESIGN CHECKING INVOLVING CONSTRAINTS, COLLABORATION AND ASSUMPTIONS -- Ontology-supported Rationale for Collaborative Argumentation Janet Burge Valerie Cross James Kiper Perdito MAYNARD-ZHANG Stephan Cornford The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2006 application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.304.3061 http://www.springerlink.com/content/n06gw87k457484w6/fulltext.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.304.3061 http://www.springerlink.com/content/n06gw87k457484w6/fulltext.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.springerlink.com/content/n06gw87k457484w6/fulltext.pdf text 2006 ftciteseerx 2021-05-30T00:20:29Z The design process involves selecting between design alternatives based on the requirements and constraints defining the system being developed. The design alternatives and the reasons for selecting one over another form the Design Rationale (DR) for the system. This information represents the designers’ intent and can be used to evaluate the design alternatives and determine the impact on the design if requirements and constraints change. Here we introduce the Ontology-supported Rationale for Collaborative Argumentation (ORCA) system which uses DR to capture and evaluate alternatives for Engineering Design. Moreover, we motivate and demonstrate our system using a NASA spacecraft design study. Text Orca Unknown |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
ftciteseerx |
language |
English |
description |
The design process involves selecting between design alternatives based on the requirements and constraints defining the system being developed. The design alternatives and the reasons for selecting one over another form the Design Rationale (DR) for the system. This information represents the designers’ intent and can be used to evaluate the design alternatives and determine the impact on the design if requirements and constraints change. Here we introduce the Ontology-supported Rationale for Collaborative Argumentation (ORCA) system which uses DR to capture and evaluate alternatives for Engineering Design. Moreover, we motivate and demonstrate our system using a NASA spacecraft design study. |
author2 |
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives |
format |
Text |
author |
Janet Burge Valerie Cross James Kiper Perdito MAYNARD-ZHANG Stephan Cornford |
spellingShingle |
Janet Burge Valerie Cross James Kiper Perdito MAYNARD-ZHANG Stephan Cornford ENHANCED DESIGN CHECKING INVOLVING CONSTRAINTS, COLLABORATION AND ASSUMPTIONS -- Ontology-supported Rationale for Collaborative Argumentation |
author_facet |
Janet Burge Valerie Cross James Kiper Perdito MAYNARD-ZHANG Stephan Cornford |
author_sort |
Janet Burge |
title |
ENHANCED DESIGN CHECKING INVOLVING CONSTRAINTS, COLLABORATION AND ASSUMPTIONS -- Ontology-supported Rationale for Collaborative Argumentation |
title_short |
ENHANCED DESIGN CHECKING INVOLVING CONSTRAINTS, COLLABORATION AND ASSUMPTIONS -- Ontology-supported Rationale for Collaborative Argumentation |
title_full |
ENHANCED DESIGN CHECKING INVOLVING CONSTRAINTS, COLLABORATION AND ASSUMPTIONS -- Ontology-supported Rationale for Collaborative Argumentation |
title_fullStr |
ENHANCED DESIGN CHECKING INVOLVING CONSTRAINTS, COLLABORATION AND ASSUMPTIONS -- Ontology-supported Rationale for Collaborative Argumentation |
title_full_unstemmed |
ENHANCED DESIGN CHECKING INVOLVING CONSTRAINTS, COLLABORATION AND ASSUMPTIONS -- Ontology-supported Rationale for Collaborative Argumentation |
title_sort |
enhanced design checking involving constraints, collaboration and assumptions -- ontology-supported rationale for collaborative argumentation |
publishDate |
2006 |
url |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.304.3061 http://www.springerlink.com/content/n06gw87k457484w6/fulltext.pdf |
genre |
Orca |
genre_facet |
Orca |
op_source |
http://www.springerlink.com/content/n06gw87k457484w6/fulltext.pdf |
op_relation |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.304.3061 http://www.springerlink.com/content/n06gw87k457484w6/fulltext.pdf |
op_rights |
Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. |
_version_ |
1766161328826744832 |