Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Haute Énergie
In this note we argue that the galactic model chosen by E.-J. Ahn, G. Medina-Tanco, P.L. Bierman and T. Stanev in their paper discussing the origin of the highest energy cosmic rays, is alone responsible for the focusing of positive particles towards the North galactic pole. We discuss the validity...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2000
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.257.9173 http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0001427v1.pdf |
id |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.257.9173 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.257.9173 2023-05-15T17:39:42+02:00 Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Haute Énergie Pierre Billoir Antoine Letessier-selvon A The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2000 application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.257.9173 http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0001427v1.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.257.9173 http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0001427v1.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0001427v1.pdf text 2000 ftciteseerx 2016-01-07T20:01:49Z In this note we argue that the galactic model chosen by E.-J. Ahn, G. Medina-Tanco, P.L. Bierman and T. Stanev in their paper discussing the origin of the highest energy cosmic rays, is alone responsible for the focusing of positive particles towards the North galactic pole. We discuss the validity of this model, in particular in terms of field reversals and radial extensions. We conclude that with such a model one cannot retreive any directional information from the observed direction of the cosmic rays. In particular one cannot identify point sources at least up to energies of about 200 EeV 1. Therefore the apparent clustering of the back-traced highest energy cosmic rays observed to date cannot be interpreted as an evidence for a point source nor for the identification of M87, which happens to be close to the North pole, as being such a source. It was recently claimed [1] that the Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECR) observed up to now, may originate from a common source located in the direction of the North pole of our Galaxy; the M87 cluster (Virgo) being the best candidate for such an emitting object. This conclusion was drawn from the result of the backtracing Text North Pole Unknown Medina ENVELOPE(-66.233,-66.233,-68.453,-68.453) North Pole |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
ftciteseerx |
language |
English |
description |
In this note we argue that the galactic model chosen by E.-J. Ahn, G. Medina-Tanco, P.L. Bierman and T. Stanev in their paper discussing the origin of the highest energy cosmic rays, is alone responsible for the focusing of positive particles towards the North galactic pole. We discuss the validity of this model, in particular in terms of field reversals and radial extensions. We conclude that with such a model one cannot retreive any directional information from the observed direction of the cosmic rays. In particular one cannot identify point sources at least up to energies of about 200 EeV 1. Therefore the apparent clustering of the back-traced highest energy cosmic rays observed to date cannot be interpreted as an evidence for a point source nor for the identification of M87, which happens to be close to the North pole, as being such a source. It was recently claimed [1] that the Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECR) observed up to now, may originate from a common source located in the direction of the North pole of our Galaxy; the M87 cluster (Virgo) being the best candidate for such an emitting object. This conclusion was drawn from the result of the backtracing |
author2 |
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives |
format |
Text |
author |
Pierre Billoir Antoine Letessier-selvon A |
spellingShingle |
Pierre Billoir Antoine Letessier-selvon A Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Haute Énergie |
author_facet |
Pierre Billoir Antoine Letessier-selvon A |
author_sort |
Pierre Billoir |
title |
Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Haute Énergie |
title_short |
Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Haute Énergie |
title_full |
Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Haute Énergie |
title_fullStr |
Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Haute Énergie |
title_full_unstemmed |
Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Haute Énergie |
title_sort |
laboratoire de physique nucléaire et de haute énergie |
publishDate |
2000 |
url |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.257.9173 http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0001427v1.pdf |
long_lat |
ENVELOPE(-66.233,-66.233,-68.453,-68.453) |
geographic |
Medina North Pole |
geographic_facet |
Medina North Pole |
genre |
North Pole |
genre_facet |
North Pole |
op_source |
http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0001427v1.pdf |
op_relation |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.257.9173 http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0001427v1.pdf |
op_rights |
Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. |
_version_ |
1766140485894668288 |