Predicting the location of northern goshawk nests: modeling the spatial dependency between nest locations and forest structure
Northern goshawks interact with each other and their environment in a spatially dependent manner. However, finding the location of active goshawk nests (e.g. where eggs are laid) in a given year is difficult due to the secretive nature of the hawks in their forest environment, their annually variabl...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Text |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2004
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.190.5793 http://www.rmrs.nau.edu/publications/reich_et_al_2004/reich_et_al_2004.pdf |
| Summary: | Northern goshawks interact with each other and their environment in a spatially dependent manner. However, finding the location of active goshawk nests (e.g. where eggs are laid) in a given year is difficult due to the secretive nature of the hawks in their forest environment, their annually variable attempts at nesting, and the extent of the area within a home range where they will nest. We used a Gibbsian pairwise potential model to describe the spatial dependency (1) among nest locations influenced by territoriality and (2) between nest locations and the environment for a large population of goshawks on the Kaibab National Forest’s (NNF) North Kaibab Ranger District (NKRD). Nest locations in a given year were regularly distributed at a minimum distance of 1.6 km between active nests; however, as the spatial scale increased (i.e. as distance between the nests increased), the degree of regularity decreased. Important forest predictors for nest locations included canopy closure, total basal area, proportion of basal area in ponderosa pine, spruce, fir, and aspen, maximum height of the understory vegetation, and presence/absence of seedlings and saplings. The probability of an occurrence of an active nest within a 10-m × 10-m area was modeled using logistic regression. Spatial analysis, using nest spacing and habitat variables, indicated that potential active nest locations were abundant and randomly distributed throughout the NKRD. This supports the supposition that the availability of locations with high potential for nests is not limiting the goshawk population on the study area. Instead, territoriality, and what appear to be non-compressible territories, sets the upper limit to the nesting population. Ultimate choice of nest location was probably constrained by the |
|---|