Evaluation of human vs. teleoperated robotic performance in field geology tasks at a Mars analog site
Exploration mission designers and planners have costing models used to assess the affordability of given missions – but very little data exists on the relative science return produced by different 1 ways of exploring a given region. Performing cost-benefit analyses for future missions requires a way...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ann
2003
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.154.6762 http://www.ic.arc.nasa.gov/m/pub/497h/0497%20(Glass).pdf |
id |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.154.6762 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.154.6762 2023-05-15T15:04:23+02:00 Evaluation of human vs. teleoperated robotic performance in field geology tasks at a Mars analog site B. Glass G. Briggs J. Jasper K. Snook The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives 2003 application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.154.6762 http://www.ic.arc.nasa.gov/m/pub/497h/0497%20(Glass).pdf en eng Ann http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.154.6762 http://www.ic.arc.nasa.gov/m/pub/497h/0497%20(Glass).pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.ic.arc.nasa.gov/m/pub/497h/0497%20(Glass).pdf Planetary exploration rovers field tests human exploration robotics science return space text 2003 ftciteseerx 2016-01-07T15:28:14Z Exploration mission designers and planners have costing models used to assess the affordability of given missions – but very little data exists on the relative science return produced by different 1 ways of exploring a given region. Performing cost-benefit analyses for future missions requires a way to compare the relative field science productivity of spacesuited humans vs. a virtual presence/ teleoperated robot or rover from a nearby habitat or orbital station, vs. traditional terrestrial-controlled rover operations. The goal of this study was to define science-return metrics for comparing human and robotic fieldwork, and then obtain quantifiable science-return performance comparisons between teleoperated rovers and spacesuited humans. Test runs with a simulated 2015-class rover and with spacesuited geologists were conducted at Haughton Crater in the Canadian Arctic in July 2002. Early results imply that humans will be 1-2 orders of magnitude more productive per unit time in exploration than future terrestrially-controlled robots. Text Arctic Unknown Arctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Unknown |
op_collection_id |
ftciteseerx |
language |
English |
topic |
Planetary exploration rovers field tests human exploration robotics science return space |
spellingShingle |
Planetary exploration rovers field tests human exploration robotics science return space B. Glass G. Briggs J. Jasper K. Snook Evaluation of human vs. teleoperated robotic performance in field geology tasks at a Mars analog site |
topic_facet |
Planetary exploration rovers field tests human exploration robotics science return space |
description |
Exploration mission designers and planners have costing models used to assess the affordability of given missions – but very little data exists on the relative science return produced by different 1 ways of exploring a given region. Performing cost-benefit analyses for future missions requires a way to compare the relative field science productivity of spacesuited humans vs. a virtual presence/ teleoperated robot or rover from a nearby habitat or orbital station, vs. traditional terrestrial-controlled rover operations. The goal of this study was to define science-return metrics for comparing human and robotic fieldwork, and then obtain quantifiable science-return performance comparisons between teleoperated rovers and spacesuited humans. Test runs with a simulated 2015-class rover and with spacesuited geologists were conducted at Haughton Crater in the Canadian Arctic in July 2002. Early results imply that humans will be 1-2 orders of magnitude more productive per unit time in exploration than future terrestrially-controlled robots. |
author2 |
The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives |
format |
Text |
author |
B. Glass G. Briggs J. Jasper K. Snook |
author_facet |
B. Glass G. Briggs J. Jasper K. Snook |
author_sort |
B. Glass |
title |
Evaluation of human vs. teleoperated robotic performance in field geology tasks at a Mars analog site |
title_short |
Evaluation of human vs. teleoperated robotic performance in field geology tasks at a Mars analog site |
title_full |
Evaluation of human vs. teleoperated robotic performance in field geology tasks at a Mars analog site |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of human vs. teleoperated robotic performance in field geology tasks at a Mars analog site |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of human vs. teleoperated robotic performance in field geology tasks at a Mars analog site |
title_sort |
evaluation of human vs. teleoperated robotic performance in field geology tasks at a mars analog site |
publisher |
Ann |
publishDate |
2003 |
url |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.154.6762 http://www.ic.arc.nasa.gov/m/pub/497h/0497%20(Glass).pdf |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic |
genre_facet |
Arctic |
op_source |
http://www.ic.arc.nasa.gov/m/pub/497h/0497%20(Glass).pdf |
op_relation |
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.154.6762 http://www.ic.arc.nasa.gov/m/pub/497h/0497%20(Glass).pdf |
op_rights |
Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. |
_version_ |
1766336165657444352 |