SAR Surface Ice Cover Discrimination Using Distribution Matching

Discrimination between open water and sea ice in SAR imagery can still pose a problem to the ice analysts during manual interpretation. To help them in this task, new algorithm have been tested which is based on the user first manually identifying a particular surface type in a SAR image (e.g., open...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rashpal S. Gill
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.142.3608
http://earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2003/papers/55_gill.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.142.3608
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.142.3608 2023-05-15T18:17:43+02:00 SAR Surface Ice Cover Discrimination Using Distribution Matching Rashpal S. Gill The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.142.3608 http://earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2003/papers/55_gill.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.142.3608 http://earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2003/papers/55_gill.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2003/papers/55_gill.pdf text ftciteseerx 2016-01-07T14:59:52Z Discrimination between open water and sea ice in SAR imagery can still pose a problem to the ice analysts during manual interpretation. To help them in this task, new algorithm have been tested which is based on the user first manually identifying a particular surface type in a SAR image (e.g., open water area or sea ice of particular concentration or ice type) then the program will automatically determine similar regions in the remainder of an image. The algorithm is based on matching the statistics of the known and unknown regions using either (a) Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS), or (b) Chi-Square (CS) distribution matching test. The main advantage in using these distribution matching tests is that the knowledge of the probability distribution functions (pdf) of the regions are not needed. Both KS and CS tests determine whether the two data sets belong to the same or different, yet undetermined, distributions. The main difference between KS and CS tests is that they are valid for un-binned and binned data respectively. The KS and CS were tested on the amplitude SAR image and the image products: (a) Power-to-Mean Ratio (PMR), and (b) Gamma-pdf which are computed from it. Both PMR and Gamma-pdf are useful tools for discriminating between open water and sea ice type in SAR images. The results presented in this article shows that the KS test is efficient (both reliable and computationally fast) at identifying similar surface types. It performed best with the amplitude data and Gamma-pdf while results using the PMR images were more prone to ambiguities. CS test did not perform as well as the Text Sea ice Unknown
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description Discrimination between open water and sea ice in SAR imagery can still pose a problem to the ice analysts during manual interpretation. To help them in this task, new algorithm have been tested which is based on the user first manually identifying a particular surface type in a SAR image (e.g., open water area or sea ice of particular concentration or ice type) then the program will automatically determine similar regions in the remainder of an image. The algorithm is based on matching the statistics of the known and unknown regions using either (a) Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS), or (b) Chi-Square (CS) distribution matching test. The main advantage in using these distribution matching tests is that the knowledge of the probability distribution functions (pdf) of the regions are not needed. Both KS and CS tests determine whether the two data sets belong to the same or different, yet undetermined, distributions. The main difference between KS and CS tests is that they are valid for un-binned and binned data respectively. The KS and CS were tested on the amplitude SAR image and the image products: (a) Power-to-Mean Ratio (PMR), and (b) Gamma-pdf which are computed from it. Both PMR and Gamma-pdf are useful tools for discriminating between open water and sea ice type in SAR images. The results presented in this article shows that the KS test is efficient (both reliable and computationally fast) at identifying similar surface types. It performed best with the amplitude data and Gamma-pdf while results using the PMR images were more prone to ambiguities. CS test did not perform as well as the
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Rashpal S. Gill
spellingShingle Rashpal S. Gill
SAR Surface Ice Cover Discrimination Using Distribution Matching
author_facet Rashpal S. Gill
author_sort Rashpal S. Gill
title SAR Surface Ice Cover Discrimination Using Distribution Matching
title_short SAR Surface Ice Cover Discrimination Using Distribution Matching
title_full SAR Surface Ice Cover Discrimination Using Distribution Matching
title_fullStr SAR Surface Ice Cover Discrimination Using Distribution Matching
title_full_unstemmed SAR Surface Ice Cover Discrimination Using Distribution Matching
title_sort sar surface ice cover discrimination using distribution matching
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.142.3608
http://earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2003/papers/55_gill.pdf
genre Sea ice
genre_facet Sea ice
op_source http://earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2003/papers/55_gill.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.142.3608
http://earth.esa.int/workshops/polinsar2003/papers/55_gill.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766192743776780288