Seamless integration: standardisation across multiple settings

Abstract. The pressure towards tighter or ‘‘seamless’ ’ integration of health information systems is a recurring issue with both practical and analytical relevance. It taps into a discourse in the IS literature in general and organisation and management science in particular. Unfortunately, the prev...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gunnar Ellingsen, Eric Monteiro
Other Authors: The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
Format: Text
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.128.1726
http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~ericm/seamless.cscw.preprint.pdf
id ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.128.1726
record_format openpolar
spelling ftciteseerx:oai:CiteSeerX.psu:10.1.1.128.1726 2023-05-15T17:43:30+02:00 Seamless integration: standardisation across multiple settings Gunnar Ellingsen Eric Monteiro The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives application/pdf http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.128.1726 http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~ericm/seamless.cscw.preprint.pdf en eng http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.128.1726 http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~ericm/seamless.cscw.preprint.pdf Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it. http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~ericm/seamless.cscw.preprint.pdf text ftciteseerx 2016-01-07T14:23:29Z Abstract. The pressure towards tighter or ‘‘seamless’ ’ integration of health information systems is a recurring issue with both practical and analytical relevance. It taps into a discourse in the IS literature in general and organisation and management science in particular. Unfortunately, the prevailing perception of integration in the IS literature is as a predominantly technical issue. The CSCW literature, however, is attentive to the socio-technical aspects of integration. Building on this – but supplemented with recent elaborations in science studies – we aim at exploring the unintended consequences of information systems integration. A user-led perspective implies emphasising the tailoring to local needs based on in-depth studies of the micro practices. We argue, however, that the condition for such an approach is radically undermined by politically motivated, regional changes towards integration with implicated standardisation. Enforcing order in the form of standards across multiple local settings, seemingly a prerequisite for tight integration, simultaneously produces disorder or additional work in other locations for other users. Empirically, our study is based on a large, ongoing integration effort at the University hospital of Northern Norway, specifically studying work practices and perceptions across multiple laboratories. Key words: integration, standardisation, unintended consequences, work practices 1. Text Northern Norway Unknown Norway
institution Open Polar
collection Unknown
op_collection_id ftciteseerx
language English
description Abstract. The pressure towards tighter or ‘‘seamless’ ’ integration of health information systems is a recurring issue with both practical and analytical relevance. It taps into a discourse in the IS literature in general and organisation and management science in particular. Unfortunately, the prevailing perception of integration in the IS literature is as a predominantly technical issue. The CSCW literature, however, is attentive to the socio-technical aspects of integration. Building on this – but supplemented with recent elaborations in science studies – we aim at exploring the unintended consequences of information systems integration. A user-led perspective implies emphasising the tailoring to local needs based on in-depth studies of the micro practices. We argue, however, that the condition for such an approach is radically undermined by politically motivated, regional changes towards integration with implicated standardisation. Enforcing order in the form of standards across multiple local settings, seemingly a prerequisite for tight integration, simultaneously produces disorder or additional work in other locations for other users. Empirically, our study is based on a large, ongoing integration effort at the University hospital of Northern Norway, specifically studying work practices and perceptions across multiple laboratories. Key words: integration, standardisation, unintended consequences, work practices 1.
author2 The Pennsylvania State University CiteSeerX Archives
format Text
author Gunnar Ellingsen
Eric Monteiro
spellingShingle Gunnar Ellingsen
Eric Monteiro
Seamless integration: standardisation across multiple settings
author_facet Gunnar Ellingsen
Eric Monteiro
author_sort Gunnar Ellingsen
title Seamless integration: standardisation across multiple settings
title_short Seamless integration: standardisation across multiple settings
title_full Seamless integration: standardisation across multiple settings
title_fullStr Seamless integration: standardisation across multiple settings
title_full_unstemmed Seamless integration: standardisation across multiple settings
title_sort seamless integration: standardisation across multiple settings
url http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.128.1726
http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~ericm/seamless.cscw.preprint.pdf
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Northern Norway
genre_facet Northern Norway
op_source http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~ericm/seamless.cscw.preprint.pdf
op_relation http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.128.1726
http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~ericm/seamless.cscw.preprint.pdf
op_rights Metadata may be used without restrictions as long as the oai identifier remains attached to it.
_version_ 1766145583994634240